논항구조기반 수동구문 분석
An Analysis of Passive Constructions based on ARG-ST.
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to explain passive constructions based on ARG-ST(Argument Structure) in HPSG. Passive Lexical Rule that was set up to deal with passive constructions in Pollard & Sag(1994) was not sufficient to explain passive constructions. This paper accepted nested ARG-ST by Manning and Sag(1998) and the revised control theory suggested by Asudeh(1998). The analysis of passive constructions with ARG-ST made it possible to solve complicated sentences in which there came out passive constructions and control constructions simultaneously. However, There existed PRO in the derivational type that Manning and Sag(1998) gave as the "universal characterization" of passive. Therefore, we eventually adapted a slightly different ARG-ST that PRO could be replaced with the content object which was structure shared with a member of the non-embedded ARG-ST. This paper regarded by-phrase as an adjunct phrase. Also, in order to incorporate pseudo-passive construction, SLASH representing a gap was used to connect with the value of LOC(CAL) which could be understood as the object of preposition.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explain passive constructions based on ARG-ST(Argument Structure) in HPSG. Passive Lexical Rule that was set up to deal with passive constructions in Pollard & Sag(1994) was not sufficient to explain passive constructions. This paper accepted nested ARG-ST by Manning and Sag(1998) and the revised control theory suggested by Asudeh(1998). The analysis of passive constructions with ARG-ST made it possible to solve complicated sentences in which there came out passive constructions and control constructions simultaneously. However, There existed PRO in the derivational type that Manning and Sag(1998) gave as the "universal characterization" of passive. Therefore, we eventually adapted a slightly different ARG-ST that PRO could be replaced with the content object which was structure shared with a member of the non-embedded ARG-ST. This paper regarded by-phrase as an adjunct phrase. Also, in order to incorporate pseudo-passive construction, SLASH representing a gap was used to connect with the value of LOC(CAL) which could be understood as the object of preposition.
참고문헌 (18)
- 김상재, "영어 수동구문의 제약기반적 연구", 박사, 영어영문학, pp.1999
- 박효명, "핵어문법론 II" (2004), 전남대학교출판부
- 정재창, "핵어문법에 입각한 영어 통제구문 연구", 박사, 영어영문학, pp.2000
- Alsina, A., "The role of argument structure in grammar: Evidence from Romance" (1996), CSLI Publication
- Asudeh, A., "Anaphora and Argument Structure: Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Reflexives and Reciprocals", pp.1998
- Borsley, Robert D., "Phrase-Structure Grammar and the Barriers Conception of Clause Structure", Linguistics, 27, pp.843~863 (1989)
- atisfying constraints on extraction and adjunction, "Bouma, G.", Groningen University and Stanford University, ~ (1998)
- Davis, Tony, "Lexical Semantics and Linking in the Hierarchical Lexicon", 박사, pp.1996
- Grimshaw, J., "Argument Structure" (1990), MIT Press
- Haegeman, L., "Government and binding theory" (1994), publishing of blackwell Ltd
- Manning, C. D., "Valence versus Binding: On the Distinctness of Argument Structure", pp.1996
- Manning, C. D., "Sag Dissociations between Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations, In Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation", pp.63~78 (1998), CSLI Publications
- Manning, C. D., "Argument Structure, Valence and Binding", Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 21, pp.107~144 (1998)
- Pollard, Carl, "Sag Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar" (1994), The university of Chicago Press
- Sag, Ivan A., "Notes on the Lexicon. Teaching materials", pp.1996
- Sag, Ivan A., "English Relative Clause Constructions", Journal of linguistics, 33, pp.431~484 (1997)
- Kiparsky, P., "Morphology and Grammatical Relations", pp.1987
- Zwicky, A., "Slashes in the Passive", Linguistics, 25, pp.639~669 (1987)