中美口述历史话语的对比研究——以Korean War口述历史为例
Comparative Study of Oral Historical Discourse between China and America——Taking the oral history of the Korean War as an example
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Due to differences in social, cultural, historical, and political environments, there are naturally significant differences between the people of China and the United States in understanding and evaluating the Korean War. But what exactly is this difference, or where and how are the differences in the positions and evaluations of the peoples of China and the United States regarding the Korean War? This is a question that we need to study. Language is not only a reflection of a stable social structure, but also spreads various world views. Using the sentiment analysis method of natural language processing technology, the differences between the sentiments and positions of the veterans in the oral history texts of China and the United States regarding the war are discovered. This reduces the influence of the researcher's subjectivity on research in traditional discourse analysis. On this basis, with the help of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), it further reveals the social and cultural power and control relationship between China and the United States.
Abstract
Due to differences in social, cultural, historical, and political environments, there are naturally significant differences between the people of China and the United States in understanding and evaluating the Korean War. But what exactly is this difference, or where and how are the differences in the positions and evaluations of the peoples of China and the United States regarding the Korean War? This is a question that we need to study. Language is not only a reflection of a stable social structure, but also spreads various world views. Using the sentiment analysis method of natural language processing technology, the differences between the sentiments and positions of the veterans in the oral history texts of China and the United States regarding the war are discovered. This reduces the influence of the researcher's subjectivity on research in traditional discourse analysis. On this basis, with the help of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), it further reveals the social and cultural power and control relationship between China and the United States.
참고문헌 (15)
- 丁俊杰, "口述历史在中国" (2016), 广西师范大学出版社
- 汪晖, "二十世纪中国历史视野下的抗美援朝战争", 文化纵横, (06) (2013)
- 王泽霞, "费尔克劳话语三维模式解读和思考", 外语研究, (03) (2008)
- Norman Fairclough, "Language and Power" (1989), Longman
- Norman Fairclough, "Discourse and Social Change" (1992), Polity Press
- Jason Glynos, "Ideological fantasy at work", Journal of Political ldeologies (2008)
- Gilles Louis Rene Deleuze, "Difference and repetition" (1968), Presses universitaires de France
- Norman Fairclough, "Critical Discourse Analysis" (1995), Longman
- 胡壮麟, "系统功能语言学概论" (2017), 北京大学出版社
- Michael Alexander Kirkwood Halliday, "An Introduction to Functional Grammar" (1994), Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press
- 杨立公, "文本情感分析综述", 计算机应用, (06) (2013)
- 张辰麟, "基于情感分析的“真假美猴王”存疑研究", 中文信息学报, (02) (2019)
- Michael Meyer, "Between Theory, Method, and Politics Positioning of the Approaches to CDA" (2001), Sage Publications
- 保罗, "历史与真理" (2004), 上海译文出版社
- Norman Fairclough, "Discourse and Social Change" (1992), Polity Press
