본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

朝鮮後期 姓貫의 階層性에 대한 硏究 ― 大丘府 西上面과 丹城縣을 중심으로 ―

Study on class character of surname origin in late Joseon Dynasty ― Focus on Seosang-myeon, Daegu-bu and Danseong-hyeon

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

Every Korean has blood-based family name and surname origin, which is based on region and presenting family origin. However, in modern Korea, where the caste system has demolished, the strong tendency to understand the surname origin as in relationship with particular class is still remained. For example, the tendency of recognizing certain surname origin as the surname origin of the yangban class, and another particular surname origin as non-yangban class is still present. If so, were same surname origins meant the one unified class? Moreover, could identical surname origin in particular region seen as all are in blood relationship? This study is to revise the problem of the classification that Korean surname origin has. Furthermore, the study ponders the problem that all surname origins of particular regions have formed one unified blood relationship or a tribe. For the explanation of this problem, the study has focused on the classification of surname origin in late Joseon Dynasty, when the prototype of the surname origin system of modern Korean has formed. This study has compared and analyzed Seosang-myeon and Daegu-bu, where were the representative cities in late Joseon Dynasty and Danseong-hyeon, the typical rural region. As a result, the study could figure the fact that the identical surname origin of a particular region does not have one unified class and blood relationship. Different classes were present within the same surname origins, and surname origins, which could clearly find the blood relationship and has blood relationship that is relevantly difficult to find, were present. This tendency was strongly appeared in urban regions than rural regions. If people in a region with identical surname origin did not have one unified class and blood relationship, this could infer the conclusion that the surname origin of Joseon Dynasty does not mean the definite tribe.

Abstract

Every Korean has blood-based family name and surname origin, which is based on region and presenting family origin. However, in modern Korea, where the caste system has demolished, the strong tendency to understand the surname origin as in relationship with particular class is still remained. For example, the tendency of recognizing certain surname origin as the surname origin of the yangban class, and another particular surname origin as non-yangban class is still present. If so, were same surname origins meant the one unified class? Moreover, could identical surname origin in particular region seen as all are in blood relationship? This study is to revise the problem of the classification that Korean surname origin has. Furthermore, the study ponders the problem that all surname origins of particular regions have formed one unified blood relationship or a tribe. For the explanation of this problem, the study has focused on the classification of surname origin in late Joseon Dynasty, when the prototype of the surname origin system of modern Korean has formed. This study has compared and analyzed Seosang-myeon and Daegu-bu, where were the representative cities in late Joseon Dynasty and Danseong-hyeon, the typical rural region. As a result, the study could figure the fact that the identical surname origin of a particular region does not have one unified class and blood relationship. Different classes were present within the same surname origins, and surname origins, which could clearly find the blood relationship and has blood relationship that is relevantly difficult to find, were present. This tendency was strongly appeared in urban regions than rural regions. If people in a region with identical surname origin did not have one unified class and blood relationship, this could infer the conclusion that the surname origin of Joseon Dynasty does not mean the definite tribe.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. "慶尙道大丘府西上面戶籍大帳", ~
  2. "慶尙道丹城縣戶籍大帳", ~
  3. 권내현, "조선후기 호적과 족보를 통한 동성촌락의 복원", 대동문화연구, (47), pp.1~33 (2004), 대동문화연구원
  4. 김경란, "조선후기 도시 지역의 姓貫변동 ―大丘府西上面을 중심으로", 대동문화연구, (71), pp.67~94 (2010), 대동문화연구원
  5. 金京蘭, "조선후기 無姓層의 有姓化 과정에 대한 분석―단성지역을 중심으로", 대동문화연구, (62), pp.75~103 (2008), 대동문화연구원
  6. 김경란, "조선후기『단성현호적대장』의 여성파악실태 연구", 박사, pp.2003
  7. 김준형, "조선후기 단성지역 사회변화의 역사적 특성-사족층의 입지변화와 대응을 중심으로", 대동문화연구, 39 (2001)
  8. 李海濬, "朝鮮後期 長興 傍村의 村落文書-湖南地方 한 同族部落의 組織, In 邊太燮博士華甲紀念史學論叢" (1985)
  9. 鄭震英, "조선후기 동성마을의 형성과 사회적 기능-영남지역의 한 두 班村 을 중심으로", 韓國史論, 21 (1991), 국사편찬위원회
  10. 崔虎, "丹城鄕案에 대한 一考察, In 又仁金龍德博士停年紀念 史學論叢" (1988)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)