口供排除规则的易经原则解析
Analysis on Exclusionary Rules of Confession from the Principles of the I Ching
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
不论是因案制宜、因地制宜,甚至再进一步细化规则或者立法跟进,对口供排除规则的适用要从一种立法、判例的不确定之中去寻找确定性,易经的原则可以为我们提供一个把握非法口供排除规则文本流变趋势和司法实践样态的有效工具。正是因为对公正的永恒追求,口供排除规则从无到有地产生,从少到多地发展起来。而口供排除规则在不同的历史时期、地域、诉讼阶段以及具体对象上也有着不同的表现形式。非法自白可以被类型化为非任意性自白、违法取得的自白、有违公正原理的自白以及毒树果实和重复自白等形式,由此可能不严格地对应于绝对排除、相对排除和裁量排除等规则。其实,上述类型之间的界限仍然很模糊,而把握口供排除规则的任意性理论内核是“以不变应万变”之道。
Abstract
Whether it’s because of the case condition, adjustive measures to local conditions, or even further refinement rules or legislation followed suit, in pursuit of certainty for application of the exclusionary rules of oral confession from uncertainty of the legislation the precedent , the principles of the I ching can provide us the effective tool with a grasp of the change trend of the illegal confession exclusionary rules’ text and the model of judicial practice.It is because the eternal pursuit of justice, that exclusionary rules of oral confession have started from scratch, and developed from few to many in text and practice. Exclusionary rule of oral confession in different periods of history, regions, procedural stages as well as the concrete objects also has a different form of its expression. Illegally-obtained confession can be type into 4 kinds such as non-voluntary confessions, illegally-obtained confessions, confessions contrary to the principle of justice, and fruit of poisonous tree and repeated confession, which may not be strictly corresponds to the rules of strict exclusion, relative exclusion and discretionary exclusion. In fact, the boundaries between the above-mentioned types are still very fuzzy, and it is a doctrine of coping with shifting rules by sticking to a changeless principle, to stick to the voluntariness theory, the kernel of exclusionary rules of oral confession.
참고문헌 (52)
- 达马斯卡, "漂移的证据法" (2003), 中国政法大学出版社
- Richard D. Friedman, "Anchors and Flotsam: Is Evidence Law “Adrift”? Evidence Law Adrift by Mirjan R. Damaška Review", The Yale Law Journal, 107(6), pp.1921~1967 (1998)
- 南怀瑾, "易经杂说(第2版)" (2002), 复旦大学出版社
- 南怀瑾, "易经系传别讲(第2版)" (2002), 复旦大学出版社
- "民间绝学智库《易经》答疑百问(第1-40问)"[URL]
- 全国人民代表大会常务委员会法制工作委员会, "中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法释义(最新修正版)" (2012), 法律出版社
- 慈继伟, "正义的两面 (修订版)" (2014), 生活⋅读书⋅新知三联书店
- 륙이계, "非法证据排除规则个案解释的逻辑倒错", 동북아법연구, 9(2), pp.179~200 (2015), 동북아법연구소
- E.H. Levi, "An Introduction to Legal Reasoning" (1949), University of Chicago Press
- 劳伦斯, "法官语言" (2007), 法律出版社
- 张培鸿, "刑诉未老先衰的证据规则", 东方早报, ~ (2010)
- 刘仁文, "刑讯逼供 : 冤假错案的罪魁祸首", 炎黄春秋, 9 (2013)
- 卡尔, "资本论" (2014), 重庆出版社
- 萨德卡特, "审判的历史" (2009), 当代中国出版社
- 王兆鹏, "美国刑事诉讼法 第2版" (2014), 北京大学出版社
- John Henry Wigmore, "Evidence", pp.817~820 (1923)
- Alex W. Skoropat, "Evidence - Admissions - Preliminary Hearing on Voluntary Character of Admission Not Required in Criminal Cases", Bar Briefs, 16(2) (1940)
- J. Bentham, "Treatise on Evidence", ~
- Stephen Greer, "The Right to Silence: A Review of the Current Debate", Mod, L. Rev, 53(6), pp.709~ (1990)
- J. Bentham, "Cofessions, Truth, and the Law" (1993), U. of Mich. Press
- John Henry Wigmore, "Students’ Textbook"
- 孙长永, "审判阶段非法证据排除问题实证考察", 现代法学, 1 (2014)
- 宋远升, "非法证据排除规则的虚化与实化——以法律实用主义为指导的证据排除规则的出路", 证据科学, 1 (2017)
- John H. Langbein, "Torture and Plea Bargaining", the University of Chicago Law Review, 46(1) (1978)
- 吴纪奎, "口供供需失衡与刑讯逼供", 政法论坛, 4 (2010)
- 王士帆, "不自证己罪原则", 硕士, pp.2004
- 舒国滢, "从司法的广场化到司法的剧场化——一个符号学的视角", 政法论坛, 3 (1999)
- 易延友, "刑事诉讼法:规则、 原理与应用 (第4版)" (2013), 法律出版社
- 李学灯, "证据法比较研究" (1992), 五南图书出版公司
- 吴继奎, "三元化递进式的自白排除法则——自白排除法则的比较法考察", 当代法学, 2 (2011)
- 艾伦, "英国证据法实务指南(第四版)" (2012), 中国法制出版社
- 艾明, "从德国证据禁止理论看两个证据规定的进步与不足", 山东警察学院学报, 2 (2014)
- 田口守一, "刑事诉讼法(第5版)", 中国政法大学出版社 (2010)
- 布洛克, "法国刑事诉讼法(原书第21版)" (2009), 中国政法大学出版社
- 托马斯, "德国刑事诉讼程序" (2004), 中国政法大学出版社
- 吴洪淇, "转型的逻辑——证据法的运行环境与内部结构" (2013), 中国政法大学出版社
- 王进喜, "美国〈联邦证据规则〉条解(2011年重塑版)" (2012), 中国法制出版社
- 王兆鹏, "新刑诉⋅新思维" (2004), 元照出版公司
- Susan Klein, "Enduring Principles and Current Crises in Constitutional Criminal Procedure", Law & Social Inquiry, 24(2), pp.533~ (1999)
- 约书亚, "美国刑事诉讼法精解 : 第2卷⋅刑事审判(第4版)" (2009), 北京大学出版社
- 理查德, "刑事证据" (2007), 法律出版社
- 伟恩, "刑事诉讼法 (上册)" (2003), 中国政法大学出版社
- 陈瑞华, "从‘证据学’走向‘证据法学’——兼论刑事证据法的体系和功能", 法商研究, 3 (2006)
- 罗纳尔多, "美国刑事诉讼-法律与实践" (2006), 武汉大学出版社
- John Henry Wigmore, "Evidence in Trials at Common Law , Vol. 8", ~
- 孙长永, "沉默权制度研究" (2001), 法律出版社
- John H. Langbein, "The Historical Origins of the Privilege against Self-Incrimination at Common Law", Mich. L. Rev, 92(5), pp.1047~ (1994)
- 阿克希尔, "美国刑事诉讼中的辩护", pp.249~ (2001), 法律出版社
- 浙江省高级人民法院, "浙刑再字第2 号判决书", ~ (2013)
- "Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U. S. 471", ~ (1963)
- "Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U. S. 298", ~ (1985)
- "Dickerson v. United States, 530 U. S. 428", ~ (2000)
