论宣读审判前讯问笔录
On Reading out the Pre-trial Confession in Court
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
内容提要“宣读审判前供述”是中国刑事诉讼法的一个有意无意的遗漏，这个立法漏洞被一些司法解释填补了，更主要的是宣读审判前供述是一种司法实践常态。中国“宣读审判前供述”摇摆于实质证据和弹劾证据的功能之间，在自证其罪和自主决策之间左右为难。然而，为了保障宣读审判前供述合法性，我国的刑事司法实践，一方面要在非法证据排除规则适用上从强调“使用禁止”转向为强调“取得禁止”；另一方面要将为直接审理原则所强调的三面关系从庭审阶段提前到侦查阶段。
Abstract
“Reading out the pre-trial confession in court” is an intentional or unintentional omission in the Criminal Procedure Law of China, but the legislative loopholes are filled up by some judicial interpretations, moreover, reading out pretrial confessions is a kind of normal judicial practice. In China, “reading out the pretrial confession” functions as either substantial evidence or impeaching evidence, and is in a dilemma between self-incrimination and autonomous decision-making. So, to legalize reading out pre-trial confession, the judicial practice of Chinese country, on the one hand, should turn from the emphasis on “prohibition using illegal evidence” to “ban obtaining evidence illegally” in the application of illegal evidence exclusion rule; on the other hand, should bring forward three-sided relationship emphasized by principles of direct trial to the investigation phase from the trial stage.
참고문헌 (20)
- 林钰雄, "严格证明与刑事证据" (2008), 法律出版社
- 高憬宏, "基层人民法院法官培训教材 : 实务卷 刑事审判篇" (2005), 人民法院出版社
- 林钰雄, "刑事法理论与实践" (2008), 中国人民大学出版社
- 李昌珂, "德国刑事诉讼法典" (1995), 中国政法大学出版社
- 克劳思, "刑事诉讼法" (2003), 法律出版社
- 罗纳尔多, "美国刑事诉讼 : 法律和实践, 第6版" (2006), 武汉大学出版社
- 高忠智, "美国证据法新解相关性证据及其排除规则" (2014), 法律出版社
- 陆而启, "从纸上谈兵到水滴石穿", 证据科学, 2 (2012)
- 龙宗智, "我国非法口供排除的 ‘痛苦规则’ 及相关问题", 政法论坛, 5 (2013)
- 李心鉴, "刑事诉讼构造论" (1992), 中国政法大学出版社
- 张颖, "重复自白的证据能力", 中国刑事法杂志, 7 (2012)
- 韩旭, "刑事诉讼热点问题专题研究" (2010), 四川大学出版社
- 田口守一, "刑事诉讼法" (2010), 中国政法大学出版社
- 郑旭, "非法证据排除规则" (2009), 中国法制出版社
- 托马斯, "德国刑事诉讼程序" (2004), 中国政法大学出版社
- 兰跃军, "论言词证据之禁止——以"德国刑事诉讼法"为中心的分析", 现代法学, 1 (2009)
- 赵凌, "庭审 ‘敢于’ 不走过场 中国法院变革刑事审判", 南方周末 (2013)
- 王兆鹏, "刑事诉讼讲义" (2009), 元照出版社
- 陆而启, "法官事实认定的心理学分析" (2014), 法律出版社
- 弗洛里奥, "错案" (2013), 法律出版社