본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

피드백 추구를 위한 모니터링과 묻기의 선행변인과 결과변인에 관한 연구

A Study on the Antecedents and Consequences of Monitoring and Inquiry for Feedback Seeking

1

조회

0

다운로드

30

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류심리과학

초록

이 연구의 첫 번째 목적은 부하의 두 가지 피드백 추구 방법인 모니터링과 묻기에 각기 다른 영향을 미칠 것이라고 가정한 목표지향성, 상사에 대한 정치성 지각, 상사와의 관계가 모니터링과 묻기에 어떤 영향을 미치는지를 알아보는 데 있었다. 두 번째 목적은 피드백 추구를 위한 모니터링과 묻기가 역할명확성과 직무긴장에 미치는 영향을 알아보는 데 있었다. 이를 위해 기업에 종사하는 사무직 종업원 310명을 대상으로 설문조사를 통해 자료를 수집하였다. 요인분석 결과, 두 가지 피드백 추구 방법인 모니터링과 묻기는 서로 구분되는 요인으로 밝혀졌다. 두 가지 피드백 추구 방법인 모니터링과 묻기의 선행변인들에 대한 분석 결과, 목표지향성의 하위차원들 중에서 학습목표지향성은 묻기에 유의한 정적 영향을 미쳤고, 증명목표지향성은 모니터링에 정적 영향을 미쳤다. 또한 상사에 대한 정치성 지각은 모니터링에 정적 영향을 미쳤고, 상사와의 좋은 관계는 묻기에 강한 정적 영향을 미쳤다. 피드백 추구를 위한 모니터링과 묻기와 결과변인들(역할명확성과 직무긴장) 간의 관계에 대한 분석 결과, 모니터링은 직무긴장에 대해서 유의한 정적 영향을 나타내었다. 이 연구에서 얻어진 결과를 토대로, 연구의 학문적 의의, 실무적 시사점, 그리고 미래연구 과제를 논의하였다.

Abstract

The first purpose of this study was to examine the effects of goal orientation, subordinate's politics perception on his or her supervisor, and the quality of LMX on monitoring and inquiry for feedback seeking. The second purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of monitoring and inquiry on role clarity and job tension. Data were gathered from 310 white collar employees who were working in various organizations. It was found that two feedback seeking methods such as monitoring and inquiry were distinct constructs each other. First, the results of data analysis indicated that there was significantly positive relationship between learning goal orientation and inquiry, and that there was significantly positive relationship between proving goal orientation and monitoring. Second, subordinate's politics perception on one's immediate supervisor positively influenced monitoring and, although not significant, subordinate's politics perception was negatively associated with inquiry. Third, the relationship between the quality of LMX and inquiry was significantly positive. Further, monitoring for feedback seeking positively influenced job tension. Based on these results, both the academic and practical implications of this study and the direction for future research were discussed.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. 고영인, "상사와의 관계(LMX)와 피드백 추구행동에 관한 연구:피드백 추구비용,자기감시,피드백 원천에 대한 신뢰도의 효과를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2001
  2. 김춘호, "연구원들의 피드백 추구행위에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1996
  3. Allen, R. W., "Organizational politics: Tactics and characteristics of its actors", California Management Review, 22, pp.77~87 (1979)
  4. Ashford, S. J., "Feedback seeking individual adaptation: A resource perspective", Academy of Management, 29, pp.465~487 (1986)
  5. Ashford, S. J., "Reflections on the Looking Glass: A Review of Research on Feedback-Seeking Behavior in Organization", Journal of Management, 29(6), pp.773~799 (2003)
  6. Ashford, S. J., "Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, pp.370~398 (1983)
  7. Ashford, S. J., "Proactive Feedback seeking: The instrumental use of the information environment", Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58, pp.67~79 (1985)
  8. Ashford, S. J., "Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness: The role of active feedback seeking", Academy of Management Journ, 34, pp.251~280 (1991)
  9. Barner-Rasmussen, W, "Determinants of the feedback-seeking behavior of subsidiary top managers in multinational corporations", International Business Review, 12, pp.41~60 (2003)
  10. Bentler, P. M., "Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures", psychological Bulletin, 88, pp.588~606 (1980)
  11. Brown, S. P., "Self-efficacy as a moderator of information-seeking effectiveness", Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, pp.1043~1051 (2001)
  12. Cropanzano, R. S., "Organizational politics, justice, and support: Their differences and similarities. In Organizational politics, justice and support: Managing social climate at work" (1995), Quorum Books.
  13. Dienesch, R. M., "Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development", Academy of Management Review, 11, pp.618~634 (1986)
  14. Dweck, C. S, "Motivational processes affecting learning", American Psychologist, 41, pp.1040~1048 (1986)
  15. Dweck, C. S., "A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality", Psychological Review, 95, pp.256~273 (1988)
  16. Elliot, E. S., "Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement", Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 54, pp.5~12 (1988)
  17. Farrell,D., "Patterns of political behavior in organizations", Academy of management Review, 45, pp.403~412 (1982)
  18. Fedor, D. B., "Performance improvement efforts in response to negative feedback: The roles of source power and recipient self-esteem", Journal of management, 27, pp.79~97 (2001)
  19. Ferris, G. R., "Personnel", human resources management: A political influence perspective, 1991, pp.17, 447~488
  20. Ferris, G. R., "Politics in organizations. In Impression management in the organization" (1989), Lawrence Erlbaum.
  21. Fletcher, C., "Acceptance of personality questionnaire feedback: The role of individual difference variables and source of interpretation", Personality and Individual Differences, 20, pp.151~156 (1996)
  22. Gandz,J., "The experience of workplace politics", Academy of Management Journal, 23, pp.237~251 (1980)
  23. Greller, M. M., "ources of feedback: A preliminary investigation", Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, pp.244~256 (1975)
  24. Hanser, L. M., "Work as an information environment", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 21, pp.47~60 (1978)
  25. Herold,D.M., "Using multiple attributes to assess sources of performance feedback", Academy of Management Journal, 30, pp.826~835 (1987)
  26. Heyman, G. D., "Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: Their relation and their role in adaptive motivation", Motivation and Emotion, 16, pp.231~247 (1992)
  27. Hochwater, W. A., "It's All Relative: The Distinction and Prediction of Political Perceptions Across Levels", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(10), pp.1995~2016 (2003)
  28. House, R., "Toward the measurement of organizational practices: Scale development and validation", Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, pp.338~396 (1972)
  29. Ilgen, D. R., "Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations", Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, pp.349~371 (1979)
  30. Jackson, S. E., "A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, pp.16~78 (1985)
  31. Kacmar, K. M., "Further validation of the perceptions of politics scale(POPS): A multiple sample investigation", Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of management, Dallas, Texas. (1994)
  32. Kacmar, K. M., "Perceptions of organizational politics scale (POPS): Development and construct validation", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, pp.193~205 (1991)
  33. Kahn, R. L., "Occupational stress: studies in role conflict and ambiguity" (1964), Wiley
  34. Kumar, P., "Organizational politics and its effect on members of organization", Human Relations, 42, pp.305~314 (1989)
  35. Larson, J. R. Jr, "he dynamic interplay between employees' feedback seeking strategies and supervisors' delivery of performance feedback", Academy of Management Review, 3, pp.408~422 (1989)
  36. Liden, R. C., "Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development", Journal of Management, 24, pp.43~72 (1998)
  37. Liden, R. C., "Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future", Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 15, pp.47~119 (1997)
  38. Morrison, E. W, "Newcomer Information seeking: Exploring type, modes, source, and outcome", Academy of Management Journal, 36, pp.557~589 (1993)
  39. Payne, R., "Effect of psychological feedback upon work decrement", Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, pp.343~3451 (1995)
  40. Podsakoff, P. M., "Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, pp.45~67 (1989)
  41. Sawyer, J. E, "Goal and process clarity: specification of multiple constructs of role ambiguity and a structural equation model of their antecedents and consequences", Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, pp.130~142 (1992)
  42. Scandura, T. A., "When managers decide not to decide autocratically: An investigation of the leader-member exchange and decision influence", Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, pp.579~584 (1986)
  43. Singh, J., "Boundary role ambiguity in marketing-oriented positions: A multidimensional, multifaceted operationalization", Journal of Marketing Research, 28, pp.328~338 (1991)
  44. Sujan, H., "Learning orientation, working smart, and effective selling", Journal of Marketing, 58, pp.39~52 (1994)
  45. Vancouver, J. B., "Feedback inquiry: The effect of source attributes and individual differences", Processes, 62, pp.276~285 (1995)
  46. VandeWalle, D, "Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, pp.995~1015 (1997)
  47. VandeWalle, D., "The role of goal orientation following performance feedback", Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, pp.629~640 (2001)
  48. VandeWalle, D., "A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process", Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, pp.390~400 (1997)
  49. VandeWalle,D.,Ganesan,S.,Challagalla,G.N.,& Brown,S.P, "An integrated model of feedback-seeking behavior:Disposition,context,and cognition.Journal of Applied", Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, pp.996~1003 (2000)
  50. Vigoda, E., "Influence tactics and perceptions of organizational politics: A longitudinal study", Journal of Business Research, 55, pp.311~324 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)