국내 간호 시뮬레이션 교육 평가도구 개발에 대한 고찰
Review for Development of Nursing Simulation Education Evaluation Instruments
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study reviews trends in the development of nursing simulation evaluation instruments and their characteristics in South Korea. Methods: Published and unpublished studies were analyzed using Korean electronic databases, such as the Research Information Sharing Service, the National Library of Korea, and the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information. The keywords for the search included “nursing,” “simulation,” “instrument development,” “evaluation,” “validity,” and “reliability.” Results: A total of 16 studies and 17 evaluation instruments from between 2012 and 2022 were included and categorized. The participants included junior or senior undergraduate nursing students. The evaluation was conducted through observation and self-report and classified into cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains. Only one instrument used for observation was measured for intra-rater reliability. Overall, 35.3% of the instruments integrally evaluated the cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains, and 23.5% only reported one type of validity. Conclusion: The results indicate that the instruments insufficiently reflect the various learning outcomes of simulation education. Therefore, future research should be conducted to develop simulation evaluation instruments to evaluate integral learning areas according to the learning goals and examine their validity.
Abstract
Purpose: This study reviews trends in the development of nursing simulation evaluation instruments and their characteristics in South Korea. Methods: Published and unpublished studies were analyzed using Korean electronic databases, such as the Research Information Sharing Service, the National Library of Korea, and the Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information. The keywords for the search included “nursing,” “simulation,” “instrument development,” “evaluation,” “validity,” and “reliability.” Results: A total of 16 studies and 17 evaluation instruments from between 2012 and 2022 were included and categorized. The participants included junior or senior undergraduate nursing students. The evaluation was conducted through observation and self-report and classified into cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains. Only one instrument used for observation was measured for intra-rater reliability. Overall, 35.3% of the instruments integrally evaluated the cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains, and 23.5% only reported one type of validity. Conclusion: The results indicate that the instruments insufficiently reflect the various learning outcomes of simulation education. Therefore, future research should be conducted to develop simulation evaluation instruments to evaluate integral learning areas according to the learning goals and examine their validity.
참고문헌 (24)
- Ahmed, I., "Reliability and validity: Importance in medical research", JPMA, The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 71(10), pp.2401~2406 (2021)[DOI]
- Bloom, B. S, "Taxonomy of educational objectives:The classification of educational goals", David McKay, ~ (1956)
- Campbell, D. T., "Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix", Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), pp.81~105 (1959)
- Goldenberg, D., "The effect of classroom simulation on nursing students' self-efficacy related to health teaching", Journal of Nursing Education, 44(7), pp.310~314 (2005)[DOI]
- Hair, J. F, "Multivariate data analysis" (1998), Prentice Hall
- 현진숙, "응급환자 간호를 위한 시뮬레이션 교육효과:메타분석", Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science, 21(1), pp.1~11 (2019), 한국기초간호학회[DOI]
- Jang, H. J., "The study on current status of simulation-based nursing education", The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 4(1), pp.1~12 (2016)
- Jeffries, P. R., "NLN Jeffries simulation theory : Brief narrative description", Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(5), pp.292~293 (2015)
- 김은정, "시뮬레이션에서의 간호역량 측정도구 개발 및 평가", 한국간호교육학회지, 22(4), pp.549~558 (2016), 한국간호교육학회[DOI]
- 김정희, "시뮬레이션을 활용한 한국간호교육 연구에 대한 체계적 고찰", 한국간호교육학회지, 19(3), pp.307~319 (2013), 한국간호교육학회[DOI]
- 김지영, "간호 시뮬레이션 교육 만족도 측정도구 개발", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 19(18), pp.291~309 (2019), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
- Kim, M. S., "Nursing research methodology" (2011), Jungdam Media
- Lasater, K., "Clinical judgment development : Using simulation to create an assessment rubric", Journal of Nursing Education, 46(11), pp.496~503 (2007)
- Lee, H. Y., "Nursing education system in Korea : Now and then", Journal of Nursing Query, 15(2), pp.68~88 (2006)
- 이경희, "한국의 도구개발 간호연구에서의 타당도에 대한 고찰", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 43(6), pp.697~703 (2013), 한국간호과학회
- Liaw, S. Y., "Assessment for simulation learning outcomes: A comparison of knowledge and self-reported confidence with observed clinical performance", Nurse Education Today, 32(6), pp.e35~e39 (2012)[DOI]
- Oermann, M. H., "Evaluation and testing in nursing education" (2016), Springer Publishing Company
- Oermann, M. H., "Assessment and grading practices in schools of nursing : National survey findings Part I", Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(5), pp.274~278 (2009)
- Park, K., "Integrative review for simulation based leaning research in nursing education : 2015-2016", Journal of Korean Society for Simulation in Nursing, 4(1), pp.41~58 (2016)
- Polit, D. F., "The content validity index : Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations", Research in Nursing and Health, 29(5), pp.489~497 (2006)[DOI]
- Seong, T. J., "Validity and reliability" (2002), Hakjisa
- 심가가, "임상판단 평가도구의 신뢰도 및 타당도 검증", Child Health Nursing Research, 21(2), pp.160~167 (2015), 한국아동간호학회[DOI]
- Tseng, H. C., "The effectiveness of problem-based learning and concept mapping among Taiwanese registered nursing students", Nurse Education Today, 31(8), pp.e41~e46 (2011)[DOI]
- 양희모, "시뮬레이션 교육에서 간호학생의 의사소통능력 측정도구의 신뢰도와 타당도 검증", 성인간호학회지, 28(1), pp.95~105 (2016), 한국성인간호학회[DOI]