Virtual Simulation-Based Learning Competency Self-Evaluation Tool: A Methodological Study
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Nursing students' competence in virtual simulation-based learning is a key factor in its success. This study explored the validity and reliability of a virtual-simulation-based learning competency self-evaluation tool for nursing students. Methods: Data were collected from a web-based survey. First, 11 nursing professors participated in a focus group interview, and 7 simulation education experts participated in the preliminary item content validity. The participants in these two aspects were not the same. Then, a preliminary survey was conducted with 15 fourth-year nursing students in I City. Next, based on these three efforts, a final survey comprising 20 evaluation items was developed. This survey was administered to third- and fourth-year nursing students at four nursing colleges in Korean provinces (Seoul, Gyeonggi, Gangwon, and Gyeongsan-do); 222 complete questionnaires were used for the final analysis. Further, Kirkpatrick’s evaluation model was used for four steps each of tool development and verification processes of the associated psychometric aspects, for a total of eight steps. An exploratory factor analysis was performed on the collected survey data, and verify the tool's validity and reliability. Results: Four factors comprising 15 items explained 66.59% of the variance: learning preparation and start-up (4 items), nursing assessment (3 items), data interpretation (3 items), and problem solving (5 items). The Cronbach's α of the tool was 0.74, and that of the factors ranged from 0.72 to 0.80. Conclusions: The tool's validity and reliability were demonstrated using established methodologies. This tool can be useful for evaluating Korean nursing students' virtual simulation learning competence.
Abstract
Purpose: Nursing students' competence in virtual simulation-based learning is a key factor in its success. This study explored the validity and reliability of a virtual-simulation-based learning competency self-evaluation tool for nursing students. Methods: Data were collected from a web-based survey. First, 11 nursing professors participated in a focus group interview, and 7 simulation education experts participated in the preliminary item content validity. The participants in these two aspects were not the same. Then, a preliminary survey was conducted with 15 fourth-year nursing students in I City. Next, based on these three efforts, a final survey comprising 20 evaluation items was developed. This survey was administered to third- and fourth-year nursing students at four nursing colleges in Korean provinces (Seoul, Gyeonggi, Gangwon, and Gyeongsan-do); 222 complete questionnaires were used for the final analysis. Further, Kirkpatrick’s evaluation model was used for four steps each of tool development and verification processes of the associated psychometric aspects, for a total of eight steps. An exploratory factor analysis was performed on the collected survey data, and verify the tool's validity and reliability. Results: Four factors comprising 15 items explained 66.59% of the variance: learning preparation and start-up (4 items), nursing assessment (3 items), data interpretation (3 items), and problem solving (5 items). The Cronbach's α of the tool was 0.74, and that of the factors ranged from 0.72 to 0.80. Conclusions: The tool's validity and reliability were demonstrated using established methodologies. This tool can be useful for evaluating Korean nursing students' virtual simulation learning competence.
참고문헌 (30)
- Adamson, K. A., "An updated review of published simulation evaluation instruments", Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(9), pp.e393~e400 (2013)[DOI]
- "2008", ~
- Cha, J. Y., "Review for development of nursing simulation education evaluation instruments", Journal of Korean Society for Simulation in Nursing, 10(2), pp.47~63 (2022)[DOI]
- Cheng, A., "A practical guide to virtual debriefings : Communities of inquiry perspective", Advances in Simulation, 5(1), pp.1~9 (2020)[DOI]
- DeVellis, R. F., "Scale development: Theory and applications" (2017), SAGE Publications
- Fogg, N., "Transitioning from direct care to virtual clinical experiences during the COVID-19pandemic", Journal of Professional Nursing, 36(6), pp.685~691 (2020)[DOI]
- Georg, C., "A rubric to assess students’ clinical reasoning when encountering virtual patients", Journal of Nursing Education, 57(7), pp.408~415 (2018)[DOI]
- Gu, Y., "The effects of vSIM for Nursing™ as a teaching strategy on fundamentals of nursing education in undergraduates", Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 13(4), pp.194~197 (2017)[DOI]
- Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis:Global edition" (2010), Pearson Education
- Hawkins, D., "The thinker’s guide to clinical reasoning: Based on critical thinking concepts and tools" (2019), Rowman & Littlefield
- Iacobucci, D., "Advancing alpha : Measuring reliability with confidence", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(4), pp.478~487 (2003)[DOI]
- Jeon, H. J., "Exploring study on virtual reality utilization strategies in scenario-based nursing simulation : An integrative review", Journal of Korean Society for Simulation in Nursing, 7(1), pp.45~56 (2019)[DOI]
- Kaiser, H. F., "An index of factorial simplicity", Psychometrika, 39(1), pp.31~36 (1974)[DOI]
- Kang, S., "Integrative review on nursing education adopting virtual reality convergence simulation", Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 10(1), pp.60~74 (2020)[DOI]
- Kim, D. H., "Metacognition and problem solving ability among nursing students in Korea", Global Health & Nursing, 4(1), pp.42~48 (2014)
- Kim, H. W., "Nursing students’immersion experience in a comprehensive simulation scenario using high fidelity human patient simulator among nursing students : A phenomenological study", Journal of Military Nursing Research, 30(1), pp.89~99 (2012)
- Kim, M., "Effects of a virtual reality simulation and a blended simulation of care for pediatric patient with asthma", Child Health Nursing Research, 25(4), pp.496~506 (2019)[DOI]
- Kim, Y., "Nursing students’ experiences in virtual simulation practice", The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 26(2), pp.198~207 (2020)[DOI]
- Kirkpatrick, D. L., "Evaluating training programs: The four levels" (2006), Berrett-Koehler Publishers
- "Coronavirus Disease-19, Republic of Korea Public Advice & Notice" (2020)[URL]
- "vSimⓇ for nursing-medical surgical Korean. (pilot version)" (2020)[URL]
- Lynn, M. R., "Determination and quantification of content validity", Nursing Research, 35(6), pp.382~385 (1986)
- Mikasa, A. W., "Outcome-based evaluation tool to evaluate student performance in high-fidelity simulation", Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(9), pp.e361~e367 (2013)[DOI]
- Moher, D., "Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols(PRISMA-P)2015 statement", Systematic Reviews, 4(1), pp.1~ (2015)[DOI]
- Park, K. O., "Effect of a situational module learning course on critical thinking disposition and metacognition in nursing students : A quasi-experimental study", The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 25(2), pp.251~262 (2019)[DOI]
- AMOS, "Statistical analysis using the easy-to-understand SPSS", pp.2014, Seong, T. J.
- Tabatabai, S., "Simulations and virtual learning supporting clinical education during the COVID-19 pandemic", Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 11, pp.513~516 (2020)[DOI]
- Tak, J. K., "Psychological testing: An understanding of development and evaluation method" (2013), Hakjisa Publisher
- Verkuyl, M., "Virtual gaming simulation for nursing education : An experiment", Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 13(5), pp.238~244 (2017)[DOI]