사이버범죄 예방을 위한 법제도적 해결방안 - 가칭 ‘사이버범죄 특별법’ 제정논의를 중심으로 -
The Law Systematic Solution for Cyber-crime Prevention - Focusing on the legislative argument of assumed the special law for cyber-crime -
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Not till the present time since it appeared ten years ago, has the cyber-crime been included but it has been distributed into the diverse special law. So we have regulated it oppressively by the several and simultaneous law whenever we run into the serious social troubles. With too much special regulation, the temporary method caused excessive crime and punishment. thus, we should streamline the related law and enforce the function of general prevention. Moreover we ought to make the cyber space criminal law in order to respond the cyber-crime emerging and changing with the state of art communication technology. We can discern the cyber-crime by telling the traditional crime using cyber space from the particular cyber space. We can include the one by revising the criminal law. And then we can legislate the other by conditionizing the newly emerging cyber-crime. We should take the following points into consideration, legislating the special cyber space criminal law. First of all, we should consider the equilibrium with off-line crime. We have treated it particularly by adding to punishment and conditionizing the social problem without thinking of pertinence about the punishment. Nevertheless, we have to discuss the cyber crime within the existing criminal law because the cyber space is no more than real world. Second of all, we should create the appropriate procedure of investigation. for sure, although we should not treat the cyber space, it has traits different from the traditional crime. So it needs the different investigation way. Thus we need the provision for both the substantial law and the procedure. Third of all, we should create the responsible provision of on-line suppliers. The role of on-line suppliers is very important. However need to discharge the responsibility of on-line suppliers on account of the basic criminal law principle, the responsibilities, which we think much of. Last of all, the final consideration point is the enlargement of technological precaution devices and protection measures. The previous method to prevent cyber crime is through the enforcement of the security system but we can't completely achieve the safety only through the technological precaution devices. They are just the primary measures and then we can respond to the cyber crime by the post criminal regulation. Nevertheless, we need to enlarge the protection measures in consideration that the punishment is irreversible
Abstract
Not till the present time since it appeared ten years ago, has the cyber-crime been included but it has been distributed into the diverse special law. So we have regulated it oppressively by the several and simultaneous law whenever we run into the serious social troubles. With too much special regulation, the temporary method caused excessive crime and punishment. thus, we should streamline the related law and enforce the function of general prevention. Moreover we ought to make the cyber space criminal law in order to respond the cyber-crime emerging and changing with the state of art communication technology. We can discern the cyber-crime by telling the traditional crime using cyber space from the particular cyber space. We can include the one by revising the criminal law. And then we can legislate the other by conditionizing the newly emerging cyber-crime. We should take the following points into consideration, legislating the special cyber space criminal law. First of all, we should consider the equilibrium with off-line crime. We have treated it particularly by adding to punishment and conditionizing the social problem without thinking of pertinence about the punishment. Nevertheless, we have to discuss the cyber crime within the existing criminal law because the cyber space is no more than real world. Second of all, we should create the appropriate procedure of investigation. for sure, although we should not treat the cyber space, it has traits different from the traditional crime. So it needs the different investigation way. Thus we need the provision for both the substantial law and the procedure. Third of all, we should create the responsible provision of on-line suppliers. The role of on-line suppliers is very important. However need to discharge the responsibility of on-line suppliers on account of the basic criminal law principle, the responsibilities, which we think much of. Last of all, the final consideration point is the enlargement of technological precaution devices and protection measures. The previous method to prevent cyber crime is through the enforcement of the security system but we can't completely achieve the safety only through the technological precaution devices. They are just the primary measures and then we can respond to the cyber crime by the post criminal regulation. Nevertheless, we need to enlarge the protection measures in consideration that the punishment is irreversible
참고문헌 (37)
- 김일수, "형법각론(제6판)" (2004), 박영사
- 박상기, "형법총론(제7판)" (2007), 박영사
- 박상기, "형법각론(제7판)" (2008), 박영사
- 배종대, "형법총론(제7판)" (2004), 홍문사
- 박상기, "형법각론(제6전정판)" (2006), 홍문사
- 백형구, "형법각론" (1999), 청림출판
- 이재상, "형법총론(제5판보정판)" (2007), 박영사
- 이재상, "형법각론" (2007), 박영사
- 오영근, "형법총론(보정판)" (2007)
- 이재상, "형법각론" (2006), 박영사
- 임? 웅, "형법총론(개정판보정)" (2007), 법문사
- 임? 웅, "형법각론(개정판보정)" (2005), 법문사
- 진계호, "형법각론(제3판)" (1996), 대왕사
- 정상조, "인터넷과 법률" (2000), 현암사
- 정성근, "형법각론" (2002), 삼지원
- 정영일, "형법각론" (2006), 박영사
- 강동범, "사이버범죄와 형사법적 대책", 형사정책연구, (42) (2000), 한국형사정책연구원
- 강동범, "사이버범죄 처벌규정의 문제점과 대책", 형사정책, 19(2) (2007), 한국형사정책학회
- 김은경, "사이버성폭력의 개념과 유형", 사이버범죄연구회 제3회 세미나 발표논문 (2000)
- 김종섭, "사이버범죄 현황과 대책", 한국형사정책학회 동계학술회의자료 (2000)
- 인터넷범죄의 규제법규에 관한 연구, in 형사정책연구원 연구보고서(00-16), "백광훈", ~ (2000)
- 신동일, "스팸메일의 불법성", 사이버범죄연구회 제18회 세미나자료 (2001)
- 이병혜, "유비쿼터스 혁명과 제3공간에 대한 문명론적 접근-새로운 문명의 탄생 가능성과 문제점을 중심으로-", 문명연지, 6(2) (2005), 한국문명학회
- 이상돈, "해킹의 형법적 규율방안", 법조, 51(3)통권 : 546 (2002), 법조협회
- 원혜욱, "인터넷범죄의 특징과 범죄유형별 처벌조항", 형사정책연구, 11(2)통권 : 42 (2000), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이진수, "사이버테러리즘의 실태와 대책", 25회 형사정책세미나 (2000), 형사정책연구원
- 오영근, "인터넷범죄에 관한 연구", 형사정책연구, 14(2) (2003), 한국형사정책연구원
- 유인모, "정보형법의 과제와 전망", 형사정책, 12(1) (2000)
- 전지현, "사이버범죄의 과거,현재 그리고 미래", 형사법연구, 19(3)통권 : 32 (2007), 한국형사법학회
- 정? 완, "사이버범죄의 현상", 형사정책, 19(2) (2007), 한국형사정책학회
- 정? 완, "스펨메일의 범람과 규제방안", 형사정책연구소식, (77) (2003)
- 조두영, "인터넷과 수사에 관한 연구", 법조, (500) (1998), 법조협회
- 조병인, "사이버범죄에 관한 연구 in 형사정책연구원 연구보고서" (2000)
- 하태영, "한국형법에 있어서 재물개념의 논쟁사-디지털시대의 새로운 법제이론과 형법 제349조 재물간주 규정의 개정-", 비교형사법연구, 5(2) (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
- 하태훈, "인터넷과 형법의 변화, in 인터넷법률" (2000), 법무부
- 허일태, "사이버 범죄의 현황과 대책", 동아대학교 법학연구소 세미나 자료집 (2004)
- 홍승희, "정보통신망의 전망", 형사정책, 19(1) (2007), 한국형사정책학회
