채권양도에 있어서 채무자의 상계항변

Abstract

Today, the transferability of a claim has been definitely established. The demand of money and an Obligatory right would be one of the reasons to admit the transferability of the claim. In a sense, a claim has no transferability in itself. However, The extension of the transferability of a claim become necessary conditions is not only considered as transferable but also acknowledged as security at present-day. The present study and a(judicial)precedent deals with the cases where the right to protest in the part of transferees is controversial. The issues about the right to protest for the transfer are examined as below in the present study. For example, the interrelationship and interpretation of Sub-Section 1 and 2 of Section 451 of the Civil Law analyzed as a general problem of the transferee's right to protest. And, the right to protest for the transfer and the legal relationship in case double transactions of a claim-including transfer with the establishment of the right of pledge on a claim, or transfer with the seizure of a claim - are examined transferees' right to protest is dealt with when he obtains a claim that is not transferable by a contract the debtor's right to protest. above all. a setoff of the debtor is also dealt with a criticism Uniquely, it is said that a setoff is a device under Civil Code, designed to use the judicial system efficiently, to remove the inconvenience and to spare the expenses of the parties. In other words, a setoff right is, provided in Civil Code, is the typical authority that contribute to such a purposes