본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

貨物相換證의 物權的 效力에 관한 小考* - 증권의 교부와 운송물의 인도에 대한 해석을 중심으로 -

The Meaning and the Construction of a Freight's Delivery in the Real Right's Validity on the Consignment Sheet

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The consignment sheet is the securities that is representative of a claim for delivery of the freight. If the consignment sheet is delivered to a holder in due course of the consignment sheet, it happens that come into force the same effect as freight's delivery about the acquisition of the right on the freight. This provision in Commercial Law § 133 is effective and well-directed. This effect on Commercial Law § 133 is the real right's validity on the consignment sheet, and in this way the consignment sheet is named the 'Traditionpapier'. But there are many different theories about how to explain the real right's validity on the consignment sheet. For example, there are ① 'absolute theory', ② 'strict relative theory', ③ 'representative theory', ④ 'modified relative theory' (securities' effect theory) and so on. Although ③ 'representative theory' is a predominance doctrine, it is lacked the concrete explain for the meaning of the 'representative' in connection with the transfer of a direct possession or indirect possession at the Civil Law. And It is wrong that by virtue of ① 'absolute theory' the delivery of a consignment sheet means the transfer of a direct possession, and on the ground of ② 'strict relative theory' the delivery of a consignment sheet means the transfer of an indirect possession. Consequently, ④ 'modified relative theory' falls in with the legislation purpose of Commercial Law and is suited to the analytical research on Civil Law. In Civil Law, A method for transfer the possession is real delivery, summary delivery, agreement on possession, delivery of the right to request a return. So then it is appropriate that the delivery of a consignment sheet is constructed a new method for transfer the possession in Commercial Law as such an extraordinary processes along with a method for transfer the possession accepted by Civil Law.

Abstract

The consignment sheet is the securities that is representative of a claim for delivery of the freight. If the consignment sheet is delivered to a holder in due course of the consignment sheet, it happens that come into force the same effect as freight's delivery about the acquisition of the right on the freight. This provision in Commercial Law § 133 is effective and well-directed. This effect on Commercial Law § 133 is the real right's validity on the consignment sheet, and in this way the consignment sheet is named the 'Traditionpapier'. But there are many different theories about how to explain the real right's validity on the consignment sheet. For example, there are ① 'absolute theory', ② 'strict relative theory', ③ 'representative theory', ④ 'modified relative theory' (securities' effect theory) and so on. Although ③ 'representative theory' is a predominance doctrine, it is lacked the concrete explain for the meaning of the 'representative' in connection with the transfer of a direct possession or indirect possession at the Civil Law. And It is wrong that by virtue of ① 'absolute theory' the delivery of a consignment sheet means the transfer of a direct possession, and on the ground of ② 'strict relative theory' the delivery of a consignment sheet means the transfer of an indirect possession. Consequently, ④ 'modified relative theory' falls in with the legislation purpose of Commercial Law and is suited to the analytical research on Civil Law. In Civil Law, A method for transfer the possession is real delivery, summary delivery, agreement on possession, delivery of the right to request a return. So then it is appropriate that the delivery of a consignment sheet is constructed a new method for transfer the possession in Commercial Law as such an extraordinary processes along with a method for transfer the possession accepted by Civil Law.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 姜渭斗, "商法總則․商行爲法 제4전정판" (2004)
  2. 金星泰, "商法總則․商行爲法論" (2005)
  3. 朴元善, "새商法(上)" (1962)
  4. 徐燉珏, "商法講義(上) 제3전정판" (1985)
  5. 孫珠瓚, "商法(上) 제15보정판" (2005), 박영사
  6. 梁承圭, "商法要論 제4판" (1997)
  7. 李基秀, "商法講義 (상법총칙․상행위법)" (2008), 박영사
  8. 李炳泰, "商法(上)" (1978), 증정판
  9. 李範燦, "商法槪論 제4판" (1997)
  10. 李哲松, "商法總則․商行爲 제9판" (2010), 박영사
  11. 林泓根, "商法 總則․商行爲 제3판" (2001)
  12. 鄭東潤, "商法(上) 제3판" (2008), 박영사
  13. 鄭東潤, "貨物相換證의 物權的 效力", 고시계 (1991)
  14. 鄭燦亨, "商法講義(上) 제10판" (2007), 박영사
  15. 鄭熙喆, "商法學(上) 제7판" (1989), 박영사
  16. 車洛勳, "商法(上)" (1971)
  17. 蔡利植, "商法講義(上)" (1998)
  18. 崔基元, "商法學新論(上) 제10증보판" (2009), 박영사
  19. 崔基元, "어음手票法 제5증보판" (2006), 박영사
  20. 金俊鎬, "民法講義 제2전정판" (2009), 법문사
  21. 宋德洙, "民法講義(上) 제2판" (2004), 박영사
  22. 李英俊, "物權法 제3판" (1996), 박영사
  23. 池元林, "民法講義 제8판" (2010), 홍문사
  24. 我妻, "物權法" (2001)
  25. 西原寬一, "商行爲法 제4판" (1992)
  26. 田中誠二, "コンメンタール 商行爲法" (1993)
  27. 平出慶道, "商行爲法 제3판" (1991)
  28. 我妻 榮, "近代法における債權の優越的地位", ~ (1975)
  29. 谷川 久, "船荷證券の物權的效力理論に關する反省", 海法會誌 (2000)
  30. Heymann, "HGB § 424 Anm. 2", ~
  31. Hueck, "23 Ⅱ4", ~
  32. K. H. Capelle, "Handelsrecht" (1970)
  33. Heymann Kotter, "Handelgesetzbuch" (1971)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (26건)