본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

수출자로부터 매입은행이 선하증권을 취득하는 경우의 법률관계 - 그 이론 구성에 대한 시도 -

Legal relation of Negotiating bank’s acquisition of Bill of Lading from exporter - attempt for the composition of theory -

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

In this study, It is examined to the following points. Firstly, Whether it isreal rights guaranteed by security or ownership transfer through entrust as asecurity right by way of transfer that negotiating bank and opening banktake right. Secondly, How it is theorized that the negotiating bank aquiresBill of Lading when opening bank of Letter of Credit is stated as consignee. As result of previous examination, it reaches to the following conclusions. Firstly, When Bill of Lading is endorsed and transferred to the negotiatingbank, the right that it acquires about the carrying goods is security bymeans of transfer and its regal characteristic is ownership transfer throughentrust. Secondly, The seller as ownership transfers bill of lading for collection ofthe price of sale to the negotiating bank when bill discount is made byhim. This is explained as follows. A seller as ownership has establishedsecurity by means of transfer for the negotiating bank. Thirdly, To acquire security by means of transfer, negotiating bankacquires ownership transfer through entrust by mere taking(receiving) bill oflading from seller as ownership. In this case, negotiating bank acquiressecurity right by means of transfer about carring goods through obtainingBill of Lading from seller as ownership. Fourthly, Bill of Lading represent security right by means of transfer asownership and also securities as claim to request to deliver cargo. Like this, with two aspects in Bill of Lading, A security right by means oftransfer as real right has different means of transfer as compared withendorsement as means of transfer of Bill of Lading as bond. Namely, Themeans of transfer and acquisition of real right is delivery and registration. itneeds to merely hand over Bill of Lading to a chattel mortgagee in order toestablish security by means of transfer. Fifthly, Negotiating bank acquires ownership over cargo and right ofconsignee in contract of carriage. As a result, It acquires claim for deliveryof cargo or claim for damage from default(breach of contract) and tort. The sixth, It is security by means of transfer that negotiating bank andopening bank acquire through Bill of Lading. It's legal characteristics isownership transfer through entrust. This opinion is valid. The reason is asfollows. In Letter of Credit transactions, an exporter tender as security tonegotiating bank Bill of Lading over cargo delivered to carrier whereas atransfer movables security allows obligor to use goods in his possesion incivil law. Accordingly, it is not irrational to transfer ownership of cargo tosecurity right holder. because a seller already has no possession.

Abstract

In this study, It is examined to the following points. Firstly, Whether it isreal rights guaranteed by security or ownership transfer through entrust as asecurity right by way of transfer that negotiating bank and opening banktake right. Secondly, How it is theorized that the negotiating bank aquiresBill of Lading when opening bank of Letter of Credit is stated as consignee. As result of previous examination, it reaches to the following conclusions. Firstly, When Bill of Lading is endorsed and transferred to the negotiatingbank, the right that it acquires about the carrying goods is security bymeans of transfer and its regal characteristic is ownership transfer throughentrust. Secondly, The seller as ownership transfers bill of lading for collection ofthe price of sale to the negotiating bank when bill discount is made byhim. This is explained as follows. A seller as ownership has establishedsecurity by means of transfer for the negotiating bank. Thirdly, To acquire security by means of transfer, negotiating bankacquires ownership transfer through entrust by mere taking(receiving) bill oflading from seller as ownership. In this case, negotiating bank acquiressecurity right by means of transfer about carring goods through obtainingBill of Lading from seller as ownership. Fourthly, Bill of Lading represent security right by means of transfer asownership and also securities as claim to request to deliver cargo. Like this, with two aspects in Bill of Lading, A security right by means oftransfer as real right has different means of transfer as compared withendorsement as means of transfer of Bill of Lading as bond. Namely, Themeans of transfer and acquisition of real right is delivery and registration. itneeds to merely hand over Bill of Lading to a chattel mortgagee in order toestablish security by means of transfer. Fifthly, Negotiating bank acquires ownership over cargo and right ofconsignee in contract of carriage. As a result, It acquires claim for deliveryof cargo or claim for damage from default(breach of contract) and tort. The sixth, It is security by means of transfer that negotiating bank andopening bank acquire through Bill of Lading. It's legal characteristics isownership transfer through entrust. This opinion is valid. The reason is asfollows. In Letter of Credit transactions, an exporter tender as security tonegotiating bank Bill of Lading over cargo delivered to carrier whereas atransfer movables security allows obligor to use goods in his possesion incivil law. Accordingly, it is not irrational to transfer ownership of cargo tosecurity right holder. because a seller already has no possession.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. 강원진, "신용장론" (2007), 박영사
  2. 강위두, "상법강의 하 전정판" (2010), 형설출판사
  3. 곽윤직, "채권총론" (2003), 박영사
  4. 김상용, "물권법" (2009), 화산미디어
  5. 김영규, "물권법" (2013), 진원사
  6. 김영호, "해상법" (2011), 팔마도서
  7. 김용한, "물권법론" (1996), 박영사
  8. 서헌제, "상법강의 하" (2002), 법문사
  9. 손주찬, "상법 상" (2005), 박영사
  10. 유중원, "운송증권" (2009), 법률문화원
  11. 이영준, "물권법" (2009), 박영사
  12. 이은영, "채권총론" (2009), 박영사
  13. 이철송, "상법총칙 상행위(제11판)" (2012), 박영사
  14. 이철송, "어음수표법(제12판)" (2012), 박영사
  15. 임석민, "물류학원론" (2010), 두남
  16. 정동윤, "어음수표법 강의(제5판)" (2004), 박영사
  17. 정찬형, "상법강의(상)(제15판)" (2012), 박영사
  18. 정찬형, "상법강의(하)(제14판)" (2012), 박영사
  19. 최기원, "상법학신론 상" (2011), 박영사
  20. 최기원, "어음수표법" (2008), 박영사
  21. 최기원, "해상법" (2002), 박영사
  22. 최준선, "어음·수표법" (2012), 삼영사
  23. 선하증권과 UNCITRAL 운송법협약에서의 운송증권, "김필곤", 법원행정처, ~ (2008)
  24. 박홍래, "동산의 양도담보", 법조, 54(12)통권 : 591, pp.261~291 (2005), 법조협회
  25. 석광현, "輸入貨物의 所有權 移轉에 관한 硏究", 통상법률, (51), pp.35~67 (2003), 법무부
  26. 송옥렬, "UNCITRAL 해상운송협약상 送荷人의 責任", 국제거래법연구, 16(2), pp.291~312 (2007), 국제거래법학회
  27. 안승국, "항공화물운송에 의하여 수입된 물품에 대한 신용장 개설은행의 양도담보 취득시기 및 이를 임의로 통관하여 처분한 수입업자의 배임행위의 성부", 刑事裁判의 諸問題, 2 (1999)
  28. 양석완, "로테르담 규칙에 있어서 운송물처분권에 관한 법적 쟁점", 상사판례연구, 24(2), pp.307~343 (2011), 한국상사판례학회
  29. 양창수, "내용이 변동하는 집합적 동산의 양도담보와 그 산출물에 대한 효력", 저스티스, 30(1)
  30. 유기준, "선하증권의 물권적효력발생시기, In 해상판례연구" (2009), 박영사
  31. 유기준, "신용장개설은행의 양도담보권, In 해상판례연구" (2009), 박영사
  32. 윤성근, "담보거래에 관한 UNCITRAL 입법가이드와 국내 담보거래 현황", 국제거래법연구, 15(2), pp.275~317 (2006), 국제거래법학회
  33. 이진홍, "선하증권이 발행된 운송물에 대한 소유권의 귀속과 관세법상의 화주및 STALE BL 거래", 商事判 例硏究, 2 (1996)
  34. 林錫珉, "記名式 선하증권의 讓渡에 관한 判例分析", 해운물류연구, (43) (2004), 한국해운물류학회
  35. 조인영, "화물의 불법인도시 신용장개설은행의 운송인에 대한 손해배상채권과 개설의뢰인에 대한 신용장대금채권과의 관계 - 대법원 2004. 3. 25. 선고 2001다53349 판결에 대한 비판적인 견지에서 -", 법조, 56(11), pp.300~328 (2007), 법조협회
  36. 한낙현, "로테르담규칙상 운송물처분권자의 권리에 관한 연구", 통상법률, (98), pp.81~116 (2011), 법무부
  37. 한영표, "신용장개설은행이 운송인을 상대로 제기한 운송물의 불법인도를 원인으로 한 손해배상청구소송에서의 손해배상의 범위", 판례연구, 20 (2009)
  38. 홍성준, "항공운송취급인의 항공운송장 무단교부와 불법행위책임", 민사판례연구, XXIII (2001)
  39. Sturley, Michael F, "The Rotterdam Rules" (2010), Sweet & Maxwell
  40. Willson, John F, "Carriage of Goods by Sea" (2010), Pearson
  41. Rhidian, Thomas. D, "The carriage of goods by sea under the Rotterdam rules" (2010), Lloyd’s List
  42. Van der Ziel, Gertjan, "Chapter 10 of the Rotterdam Rules : Control of Goods in Transit" (2009), Texas International Law Journal

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)