목표언어 중심의 등가적 번역전략에 대한 비판적 연구
A Critical Study of Target Language-Centered Translation Strategies
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to show that target language-centered translation strategies are not empirically valid. It also gives a critical discussion about the nature of translated texts with regard to that of non-translated texts to insist that there be no empirical reason to devise translation strategies to change translated text properties such as expliciation and simplification in order to fit into the norms of non-translated texts. The latter discussion is based on the notion of intertextuality of translated texts proposed by Hermans (2008). First, I critically review Kim Jeong-Woo (2011, 2013)’s translation rules to show what target language-centered translation strategies are and what their problems are. To be specific, Kim’s translation rules to change English plural nouns into Korean marked plural form ‘-tul’ are shown to be empirically invalid and they are not understandable to translators since those rules are devised based on linguistic theory-imbued terminologies. In the latter half of the paper I propose to treat translated texts to be equal with the status of non-translated texts from the perspective of ‘the Third Code’. Translated texts are mirrored or influenced by their source texts to be different from non-translated texts and their properties must be different from those of non-translated texts. Therefore they can not be reduced to the properties of non-translated texts.
Abstract
This paper aims to show that target language-centered translation strategies are not empirically valid. It also gives a critical discussion about the nature of translated texts with regard to that of non-translated texts to insist that there be no empirical reason to devise translation strategies to change translated text properties such as expliciation and simplification in order to fit into the norms of non-translated texts. The latter discussion is based on the notion of intertextuality of translated texts proposed by Hermans (2008). First, I critically review Kim Jeong-Woo (2011, 2013)’s translation rules to show what target language-centered translation strategies are and what their problems are. To be specific, Kim’s translation rules to change English plural nouns into Korean marked plural form ‘-tul’ are shown to be empirically invalid and they are not understandable to translators since those rules are devised based on linguistic theory-imbued terminologies. In the latter half of the paper I propose to treat translated texts to be equal with the status of non-translated texts from the perspective of ‘the Third Code’. Translated texts are mirrored or influenced by their source texts to be different from non-translated texts and their properties must be different from those of non-translated texts. Therefore they can not be reduced to the properties of non-translated texts.
참고문헌 (18)
- 곽은주, "텍스트 차원에서의 복수표현의 영한번역전략", 번역학연구, 12(1), pp.7~34 (2011), 한국번역학회
- 김도훈, "대시(dash)와 줄표의 비교 및 영한 번역 전략", 번역학연구, 11(3), pp.41~64 (2010), 한국번역학회
- 김정우, "한국어 번역문의 중간언어적 특성 —그 연원과 극복 방안을 중심으로—", 번역학연구, 12(1), pp.75~122 (2011), 한국번역학회
- 김정우, "영어 복수 표현의 한국어 번역에 관한 종합적 고찰", 번역학연구, 14(4), pp.61~90 (2013), 한국번역학회
- 김정우, "영어 번역 한국어의 문체와 어휘", 한국어학, 53, pp.1~27 (2011), 한국어학회
- 김혜영, "국어 번역 글쓰기의 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2009
- 이상섭, "외국 참고서에서 보는 한국어에 대한 시각", 새국어생활, 8(1), pp.247~256 (1998)
- 임홍빈, "복수 표지 ‘들’과 사건성", 애산학보, 24, pp.3~30 (2000)
- 조숙희, "한국어 무표형 명사의 단·복수 해석에 대한 화용적 분석", 언어연구, 28(2), pp.373~384 (2011), 언어정보연구소
- 조의연, "사람명사 복수표현의 영한번역전략에 대한 비판적 소고", 번역학연구, 13(1), pp.267~281 (2012), 한국번역학회
- Chesterman, Andrew., "Memes of translation : The Spread of ideas in translation theory" (1997), John Benjamins
- Ebeling, Jarle, "Contrastive linguistics, translation, and parallel corpora", Meta, 43(4) (1998)[DOI]
- Frawley, W., "Translation, Literary, Linguistic & Philosophical Perspectives", pp.159~175 (1984), Associated University Press
- Hermans, Theo, "Translation, equivalence, and intertextuality", Wasafiri, 40(18), pp.39~41 (2008)
- Laviosa, Sara., "Corpus-based approaches to contrastive linguistics and translation studies", pp.45~54 (2003), Rodopi
- Lörscher, Wolfgang, "Translation performance, translation process, and translation strategies : a psycholinguistic investigation" (1991), Guten Narr
- McLaughlin, Mairi, "The Linguistics of translated texts: the language of translation as the ‘Third Code.’", Paper read at Princeton University, ~ (2009)
- McLaughlin, Mairi, "Tradurre", Tradire: Translation as a cause of linguistic change from Manuscripts to the Digital Age, 2011