본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

大覺國師 義天의 茶談論에 관한 일고찰

The critical study on the concept of Uichon’s Tea

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

The critical study on the concept of Uichon’s Tea No, Sung-Hwan This article is about the critical study on the concept of Uichon’s Tea. By reviewing of previous studies, the concept of Uichon’s Tea can be summarizes as follows. He followed the tea plantation techniques of the Song dynasty and built the Sean-am temple. By the Tea, He was in the traditional mentor disciple relation with the Liao dynasty’s emperor. He imported the Long Feng tea from the Song dynasty and exported the Noewon-tea to the China. The philosophy of Uichon’s tea is based on the Daseonilyeo(茶禪一如). In fact, academically his concept of tea was not refined. He wasn’t the person who brought the tea plantation from the Song Dynasty. And he wasn’t in the traditional mentor disciple relation with the Liao dynasty’s emperor. Also it wasn’t him who developed the Noewon-tea and had important role in tea trade with China. Uichon’s Tea concept was more close to the DongLim temple’s monk Haewon who prefers to have a tea with intense discussion rather than ideological practice such as DaseonIlyeo (茶 禪一如) or Hwagyeongcheongjoek(和敬淸寂). The tea wasn’t the Zen practice to find the truth, he was just enjoying tea while the discussion on Buddhist scripture or during the everyday life. The tea was nothing more than an tea in the daily life.

Abstract

The critical study on the concept of Uichon’s Tea No, Sung-Hwan This article is about the critical study on the concept of Uichon’s Tea. By reviewing of previous studies, the concept of Uichon’s Tea can be summarizes as follows. He followed the tea plantation techniques of the Song dynasty and built the Sean-am temple. By the Tea, He was in the traditional mentor disciple relation with the Liao dynasty’s emperor. He imported the Long Feng tea from the Song dynasty and exported the Noewon-tea to the China. The philosophy of Uichon’s tea is based on the Daseonilyeo(茶禪一如). In fact, academically his concept of tea was not refined. He wasn’t the person who brought the tea plantation from the Song Dynasty. And he wasn’t in the traditional mentor disciple relation with the Liao dynasty’s emperor. Also it wasn’t him who developed the Noewon-tea and had important role in tea trade with China. Uichon’s Tea concept was more close to the DongLim temple’s monk Haewon who prefers to have a tea with intense discussion rather than ideological practice such as DaseonIlyeo (茶 禪一如) or Hwagyeongcheongjoek(和敬淸寂). The tea wasn’t the Zen practice to find the truth, he was just enjoying tea while the discussion on Buddhist scripture or during the everyday life. The tea was nothing more than an tea in the daily life.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 김방룡, "선승(禪僧)들의 차문화에 대한 일고(一考)", 禪學(선학), (21), pp.175~214 (2008), 한국선학회
  2. 김미선, "儒佛의 茶詩 世界", 한국사상과 문화, (55), pp.61~88 (2010), 한국사상문화학회
  3. 金明培, "다도학", pp.221~ (1987), 학문사
  4. 金明培, "古稀紀念增補版 茶道學論攷", pp.544~545 (1994), 大光文化社
  5. 류건집, "송대다서의 주해(상)", pp.199~ (2012), 이른아침
  6. 文一平, "호암전집(2)", pp.361~ (1947), 一成堂書店
  7. 석천, "천년 茶宗家의 숨결을 지켜온 명문 仙巖寺의 茶香", 차의 세계, (4), pp.53~ (2009), 차의 세계사
  8. 徐兢, "宣和奉使高麗圖經", pp.384~ (2005), 황소자리
  9. 李鍾燦, "義天의 詩文學", 佛敎語文論集, (6), pp.30~ (2001), 한국불교어문학회
  10. 의천, "대각국사집", pp.442~ (2012), 동국대 출판부
  11. 정서경, "고려 다시와 그 문화", pp.51~ (2008), 이른아침
  12. 정현진, "高麗 宮中儀禮의 下賜茶에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2009
  13. 지허, "지허스님의 차 -아무도 말하지 않은 한국전통차의 참모습-", pp.214~ (2003), 김영사
  14. 장남원, "고려시대 茶文化와 靑瓷청자 茶具를 중심으로", 美術史論壇, (24), pp.129~162 (2007), 한국미술연구소
  15. 조범환, "장보고와 차문화 전파", pp.73~ (2010), 재단법인 해상왕장보고기념사업회
  16. 崔炳憲, "大覺國師 義天의 渡宋活動과 高麗. 宋의 佛敎交流 –晉水淨源. 慧因寺와의 관계를 중심으로-", 진단학보, 71-72, pp.361~362 (1991), 진단학회
  17. 최석환, "고려시대에 유행한 뇌원차", 차의 세계, 4, pp.29~ (2009), 차의 세계사
  18. 허흥식, "한국금석전문(중)", pp.5351~ (1984), 아세아문화사
  19. 홍병화, "조선시대 사찰건축에서 사동중정형배치의 형성과정", 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 25(03), pp.159~166 (2009), 대한건축학회
  20. 朝鮮總督府中樞院, "高麗以前の風俗關係資料撮要", pp.21~ (1944), 朝鮮總督府中樞院

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)