“四、七之辩”中韩国儒者对朱子“心”“性”“情”的理解与诠释
Korean Confucianists’ understanding and explanation on Zhuzi’s “Mind”, “Nature” and Emotion in the “Four-Seven” Controversy
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
中文提要:在朱子性理学的概念、命题中,“心”的概念无疑具有关键性的 地位,其既内在地关联着朱子性情论、理气论,同时又与他性理学中的中和说、 未发已发说、人心道心说、天命之性与气质之性、四端与七情、居敬与穷理等紧 密相连、密不可分。然而,现代朱子学研究者之间对朱子所谓的“心”以及其相 关概念、命题的看法和理解却迥然不同、未有定论。有鉴于此,本论文试图在对 朱子性理学的内在义理和逻辑有所辨析与说明的背景下,以韩国朝鲜时代的儒家 学者对朱子性理学中的概念、命题的理解、把握与论辩为基础来就此问题作一分 析和讨论,以期在对朱子所谓的“心”以及其性理学中其它概念、命题的理解与 把握上提供一个比较新的视角。
Abstract
In Zhuzi’s Xing-li School, the “Mind”(心) is a critical concept and intrinsically related to his “Principle and Material Force”(理气), “Nature–Emotion”(性情). At the same time, the “Mind”(心) has very close relationship with other major concepts in Zhu Xi’s Xing-li School, such as “Principle and Material Force”(理气), “Nature – Passion”(性情), “Mean and Harmony”(中和), “Mind of Man-Mind of the Way”(人心 与道心), “Original Nature-Physical Nature”(天命之性与气质之性), “Four Beginnings- Seven Emotions”(四端与七情), and “Abidance in Reverence Exhaustive Study of Principle”(居敬穷理).However, modern scholars have different views on the Zhuzi’s “Mind”(心) and other related concepts. Considering this, based on the explanation of the intrinsic logics in Zhuzi’s Xing-li School, this paper tries to analyze and discuss ancient Korean Confucianists’ understanding, master and controversies on the concepts and propositions in Zhuzi’s Xing-li School. Therefore, we can offer a very fresh view on Zhuzi’s “Mind”(心) and other concepts.
참고문헌 (10)
- 朱 熹, "朱子大全, 朱子语类"
- 李 滉, "退溪集, 韩国文集丛刊 第29—31 辑" (1990), 首尔:民族文化推进会
- 奇大升, "(国译)高峰集" (1989), 首尔:民族文化推进会
- 李 珥, "栗谷全书" (1992), 首尔:成均馆大学校出版部
- 成 浑, "牛溪集, 韩国文集丛刊 43 辑" (1989), 首尔:民族文化推进会
- 贾顺先主编, "退溪全书今注今译" (1993), 成都:四川大学出版社
- 牟宗三, "心体与性体" (1971), 台北:中正书局
- 牟宗三, "从陆象山到刘蕺山" (1979), 台北:学生书局
- 刘述先, "朱子哲学思想的发展与完成" (1982), 台北:学生书局
- 陈 来, "朱子哲学研究" (2000), 上海:华东师大出版社
