칸트의 평화사상과 국제질서-민주평화론과 하버마스 기획을 중심으로-
Kantian Peace and International Order －With Special Reference to Democratic Peace and Habermas’ Cosmopolitan Project－
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Although democratic peace thesis and Habermas’ cosmopolitan project are based on Kantian peace in terms of their own theoretical origin, their argumentative contents and positions are distinct and different from each other. Kantian peace had been based on a peaceful league or union of free states, yet the membership for the union could not be understood as reserved only for narrowly defined western liberal democracies. In this regard, so-called democratic peace thesis is fundamentally problematic from the point of Kantian peace. Moreover, as possible use of force in the name of humanitarian intervention that reflected unilaterality understood moralism by some major western powers is to be recognized implicitly for democratic peace, it appears to be essentially contrary to the Kantian peace. Habermas’ version of Kantian project for the pursuit of cosmopolitan legal order in terms of constitutionalization of international law seems to be more persuasive and valid from the Kantian peace. In particular, as to the problem of humanitarian intervention, which is being regarded as one of the most difficult problems of international legal community,Habermas’ project has attained stronger argumentative position, as it may provide proper procedures and conditions for it supported by international law as a constitution of cosmopolitan community. This is because Habermas’ cosmopolitan project in which constitutionalization of intentional law is firmly established may guarantee universal protection of human rights and democratic practices without the possibility of misuse of military forces by some major powers. Having said that, Habermas’ cosmopolitan project is far from perfect. Rather,it must be accompanied by material reformative programs for international organizations, such as the UN in a fundamental way. In order for real cosmopolitan legal order to be established and developed, international institutions and organizations must be restructured from the legislative, executive and judicial perspectives. In addition, constructive roles and functions that could be played by sovereign states should also be noted for establishing cosmopolitan legal order. Only by firmly guaranteeing protection of human rights and democratic practices at the domestic level provided by sovereign states could emerge a real cosmopolitan community.
Abstract
Although democratic peace thesis and Habermas’ cosmopolitan project are based on Kantian peace in terms of their own theoretical origin, their argumentative contents and positions are distinct and different from each other. Kantian peace had been based on a peaceful league or union of free states, yet the membership for the union could not be understood as reserved only for narrowly defined western liberal democracies. In this regard, so-called democratic peace thesis is fundamentally problematic from the point of Kantian peace. Moreover, as possible use of force in the name of humanitarian intervention that reflected unilaterality understood moralism by some major western powers is to be recognized implicitly for democratic peace, it appears to be essentially contrary to the Kantian peace. Habermas’ version of Kantian project for the pursuit of cosmopolitan legal order in terms of constitutionalization of international law seems to be more persuasive and valid from the Kantian peace. In particular, as to the problem of humanitarian intervention, which is being regarded as one of the most difficult problems of international legal community,Habermas’ project has attained stronger argumentative position, as it may provide proper procedures and conditions for it supported by international law as a constitution of cosmopolitan community. This is because Habermas’ cosmopolitan project in which constitutionalization of intentional law is firmly established may guarantee universal protection of human rights and democratic practices without the possibility of misuse of military forces by some major powers. Having said that, Habermas’ cosmopolitan project is far from perfect. Rather,it must be accompanied by material reformative programs for international organizations, such as the UN in a fundamental way. In order for real cosmopolitan legal order to be established and developed, international institutions and organizations must be restructured from the legislative, executive and judicial perspectives. In addition, constructive roles and functions that could be played by sovereign states should also be noted for establishing cosmopolitan legal order. Only by firmly guaranteeing protection of human rights and democratic practices at the domestic level provided by sovereign states could emerge a real cosmopolitan community.
참고문헌 (21)
- 문성훈, "칸트의 세계시민사회이념과 인정", 사회와 철학, (19), pp.185~226 (2010), 한국사회와철학연구회
- 이혜정, "민주평화론의 패러독스: 칸트 평화사상의 왜곡과 오용", 한국정치외교사논총, 29(2), pp.129~154 (2008), 한국정치외교사학회
- 장은주, "인권의 보편성과 인도적 개입의 정당성 - ‘북한 인권 문제’의 올바른 해법을 위한 철학적 토대의 모색과 관련하여 -", 사회와 철학, (17), pp.285~324 (2009), 한국사회와철학연구회
- Kevin E. Dodson, "Kant’s Perpetual Peace : Universal Civil Society or League of States", Southwest Philosophical Studies, 15, pp.1~9 (1993)
- Jürgen Habermas, "Kant’s Idea of Perpetual Peace, with the Benefit of Two Hundred Years’ Hindsight, In Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Idea", pp.113~153 (1997), MIT Press
- Jürgen Habermas, "The Divided West" (2006), Polity Press
- Jürgen Habermas, "Bestiality and Humanity: A War on the Border Between Law and Morality", Die Zeit, 54(18), pp.1~8 (1999)
- Otfried Höffe, "Kant’s Cosmopolitan Theory of Law and Peace" (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Pauline Kleingeld, "Approaching Perpetual Peace : Kant’s Defence of a League of States and his Ideal of a World Federation", European Journal of Philosophy, 12, pp.304~325 (2004)
- Immanuel Kant, "Conjectures on the Beginning of Human History, In Kant: Political Writings", pp.221~234 (1991), Cambridge University Press
- Immanuel Kant, "On the Common Saying: This May be True in Theory, but it does not Apply in Practice, In Kant: Political Writings", pp.61~87 (1991), Cambridge University Press
- Immanuel Kant, "The Metaphysics of Morals, In Kant: Political Writings", pp.131~175 (1991), Cambridge University Press
- Immanuel Kant, "Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch, In Kant: Political Writings", pp.93~131 (1991), Cambridge University Press
- Geoffrey Best, "War and Society in Revolutionary Europe1770-1870" (1982), St. Martin’s
- Robert Jervis, "From Balance to Concert : A Study of International Security Cooperation", World Politics, 38, pp.58~79 (1985)
- Patrick Capps, "Kant’s Concept of International Law", Legal Theory, 16, pp.229~257 (2010)
- Alexander V. Kozhemiakin, "Expanding the Zone of Peace? Democratization and International Security" (1998), St. Martin’s
- Alan Gilbert, "Must Global Politics Constrain Democracy? Great Power Realism, Democratic Peace, and Democratic Internationalism" (1999), Princeton University Press
- Michael W. Doyle, "Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, In Debating the Democratic Peace", pp.3~57 (2001), MIT Press
- Robyn Eckersley, "From cosmopolitan nationalism to cosmopolitan democracy", Review of International Studies, 33, pp.675~692 (2007)
- Robert Fine, "Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of Cosmopolitanism", Constellations, 10, pp.469~487 (2003)