본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

STR 자료의 데이터마이닝을 이용한 혈연관계의 분류

Classification of Common Relationships Based on Short Tandem Repeat Profiles Using Data Mining

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타의약학

초록

We reviewed past studies on the identification of familial relationships using 22 short tandem repeat markers. As a result, we can obtain a high discrimination power and a relatively accurate cut-off value in parent-child and full sibling relationships. However, in the case of pairs of uncle-nephew or cousin, we found a limit of low discrimination power of the likelihood ratio (LR) method. Therefore, we compare the LR ranking method and data mining techniques (e.g., logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, diagonal linear discriminant analysis, diagonal quadratic discriminant analysis, K-nearest neighbor, classification and regression trees, support vector machines, random forest [RF], and penalized multivariate analysis) that can be applied to identify familial relationships, and provide a guideline for choosing the most appropriate model under a given situation. RF, one of the data mining techniques, was found to be more accurate than other methods. The accuracy of RF is 99.99% for parentchild, 99.44% for full siblings, 90.34% for uncle-nephew, and 79.69% for first cousins.

Abstract

We reviewed past studies on the identification of familial relationships using 22 short tandem repeat markers. As a result, we can obtain a high discrimination power and a relatively accurate cut-off value in parent-child and full sibling relationships. However, in the case of pairs of uncle-nephew or cousin, we found a limit of low discrimination power of the likelihood ratio (LR) method. Therefore, we compare the LR ranking method and data mining techniques (e.g., logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, diagonal linear discriminant analysis, diagonal quadratic discriminant analysis, K-nearest neighbor, classification and regression trees, support vector machines, random forest [RF], and penalized multivariate analysis) that can be applied to identify familial relationships, and provide a guideline for choosing the most appropriate model under a given situation. RF, one of the data mining techniques, was found to be more accurate than other methods. The accuracy of RF is 99.99% for parentchild, 99.44% for full siblings, 90.34% for uncle-nephew, and 79.69% for first cousins.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Butler JM, "Biology and genetics of new autosomal STR loci useful for forensic DNA analysis", Forensic Sci Rev, 24, pp.15~26 (2012)
  2. Bieber FR, "Human genetics : finding criminals through DNA of their relatives", Science, 312, pp.1315~1316 (2006)
  3. Myers SP, "Searching for first-degree familial relationships in California's offender DNA database : validation of a likelihood ratio-based approach", Forensic Sci Int Genet, 5, pp.493~500 (2011)
  4. Schneider PM, "Scientific standards for studies in forensic genetics", Forensic Sci Int, 165, pp.238~243 (2007)
  5. 이재원, "Statistical Evaluation of Sibling Relationship", Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods, 14(3), pp.541~549 (2007), 한국통계학회
  6. 정수진, "STR 마커를 이용한 한국인에서의 혈연관계 판정기준 분석", 과학수사학회지, 10(2), pp.107~115 (2016), 한국과학수사학회[DOI]
  7. Evett IW, "Interpreting DNA evidence: statistical genetics for forensic scientists" (1998), Sinauer Associates
  8. 양인석, "상염색체 STR 유전자형 시뮬레이션을 이용한 한국인에서의혈연지수 분포 분석", 대한법의학회지, 37(2), pp.57~65 (2013), 대한법의학회[DOI]
  9. Gaytmenn R, "Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of sibship calculations using AmpF lSTR Profiler Plus", Int J Legal Med, 116, pp.161~164 (2002)
  10. Budowle B, "CODIS STR loci data from 41 sample populations", J Forensic Sci, 46, pp.453~489 (2001)
  11. Cowen S, "A likelihood ratio approach to familial searching of large DNA databases", Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser, 1, pp.643~645 (2008)
  12. Curran JM, "Effectiveness of familial searches", Sci Justice, 48, pp.164~167 (2008)
  13. Cox DR, "The regression analysis of binary sequences", J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol, 20, pp.215~242 (1958)
  14. Fisher RA, "The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems", Ann Eugen, 7, pp.179~188 (1936)
  15. Bickel PJ, "Some theory for Fisher’s linear discriminant function, ‘naive Bayes’, and some alternatives when there are many more variables than observations", Bernoulli, 10, pp.989~1010 (2004)
  16. Dudoit S, "Comparison of discrimination methods for the classification of tumors using gene expression data", J Am Stat Assoc, 97, pp.77~87 (2002)
  17. Vapnik VN, "The nature of statistical learning theory" (2000), Springer
  18. Breiman L, "Classification and regression trees", pp.1984, Wadsworth & Brooks
  19. Altman NS, "An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression", Am Stat, 46, pp.175~185 (1992)
  20. Breiman L, "Random forests", Mach Learn, 45, pp.5~32 (2001)
  21. Witten DM, "A penalized matrix decomposition, with applications to sparse principal components and canonical correlation analysis", Biostatistics, 10, pp.515~534 (2009)
  22. Buckleton JS, "DNA evidence" (2004), CRC Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)