민주화 이후 캄보디아의 의회정치와 정당정치: 의회의 정당 간 합의능력과 대(對) 행정부 견제능력을 중심으로
The Parliamentary Politics and Party Politics of Cambodia Since Its Democratization
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this article is to examine the parliamentary politics since the democratization of Cambodia, considering the characteristics of its party politics. For this purpose it evaluates the efficiency of parliamentary function focusing on both the degree of mutual agreement among the parliamentary parties and the parliament's checking power against the executive. The former seemed to be improving and the latter has been so weak. Although this result can be natural to the cabinet government, this means the level of institutionalization of parliamentary politics is still very low in Cambodia. It is because the parliamentary politics has been affected from fluid party politics that can not still considered as an institution since its democratization. Characteristics of fluid party politics since democratization can be summarized as follows: First, the major individual parties are still in the very low levels of intra-party democracy and become a machine party. Second, the major individual parties do not have their distinctive policies or party ideology. Third, the competitiveness among parties is still low in a parliamentary elections. Fourth, the characteristics of party state system that do not distinguish a state with a party still has continued. Fifth, unstable cooperative relationship among competitive parties has been repeated to establish a new government. Therefore if these fluid characteristics of party politics are solved, the institutionalization of parliamentary politics can be accomplish gradually in Cambodia.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to examine the parliamentary politics since the democratization of Cambodia, considering the characteristics of its party politics. For this purpose it evaluates the efficiency of parliamentary function focusing on both the degree of mutual agreement among the parliamentary parties and the parliament's checking power against the executive. The former seemed to be improving and the latter has been so weak. Although this result can be natural to the cabinet government, this means the level of institutionalization of parliamentary politics is still very low in Cambodia. It is because the parliamentary politics has been affected from fluid party politics that can not still considered as an institution since its democratization. Characteristics of fluid party politics since democratization can be summarized as follows: First, the major individual parties are still in the very low levels of intra-party democracy and become a machine party. Second, the major individual parties do not have their distinctive policies or party ideology. Third, the competitiveness among parties is still low in a parliamentary elections. Fourth, the characteristics of party state system that do not distinguish a state with a party still has continued. Fifth, unstable cooperative relationship among competitive parties has been repeated to establish a new government. Therefore if these fluid characteristics of party politics are solved, the institutionalization of parliamentary politics can be accomplish gradually in Cambodia.
참고문헌 (32)
- "의회정치와 정당", pp.257~282 (1999), 서울: 건국대학교 출판부
- "한국정당정치의 이해" (2003), 서울: 나남
- "한국 의회정치의 반성과 개혁과제", pp.19~44 (2004), 서울:한울아카데미
- "의회정치와 민주주의", pp.31~60 (1999), 서울 건국대학교 출판부
- "동남아시아의 정당정치와 민주주의 : 필리핀, 태국, 인도네시아의 사례비교" (2002)
- "한국 당정관계의 역동성과 제도화", pp.95~124 (2004), 서울 한울아카데미
- "민주화 이후 캄보디아의 정당정치 선거제도의 정치적 효과분석" (2006)
- "내각제와 대통령제" (1995), 서울: 나남
- "Democracy in Cambodia: Theories and Realities" (1995), Phnom Penh: CICP
- "Transforming Oppositions in Cambodia", 15(3), pp.295~318 (2001)
- "Protest and Pluralism in Cambodia", 9(3), pp.165~186 (2002)
- "Final Statement and Report on the National Assembly Elections" (2003), Phnom Penh: COMFREL
- "Annual Report on National Assembly Performance: Ooc 2003-Sep 2004" (2004), Phnom Penh: COMFREL
- "Second Annual Parliamentary Watch Report: Oct2004-Sep2005" (2005), Penom Penh: COMFREL
- "and Revolution since 1945. Bangkok"
- "A History of Cambodia" (1998), Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books
- "Cambodia: Getting Away With Authoritarianism?", 16(4), pp.98~112 (2005)
- "A Framework for Analysis. London", Cambridge University Press.
- "Judy Legerwood. 1992. Analysis of the situation of women in Cambodia. Phnom Penh"
- "National Elections: Cambodia's Experiences & Expectations" (1998), Phnom Penh: CICP
- "Elections in Cambodia: Lessons Learned and Future Directions" (2002), Phnom Penh: CICP
- "Rewriting Cambodia history to 'adapt' it to a new political context: The Kampuchean People's Revolutionary Party's historiograghy(1979-1991)", 31(4), pp.807~847 (1997)
- "Effective Number of Parties A Measure with Application to West Europe.", pp.3~27
- "Hun Sen Undermines Cambodia's Stability", 169(1), pp.42~46 (2006)
- "Cambodian Constitutions 1953-1993" (1995), Bangkok: White Lotus
- "Elections and parties in new European democracies" (2003), Washington D.C.:CQ Press
- "Robert J. Huckshorn. 1976. Party Leadership in the States. University of Massachusetts Press."
- "Samuel P. Huntington. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven", Yale University Press.
- "Party Systems in the Third Wave", 9(3), pp.67~81 (1999)
- "Intervention and Change in Cambodia" (2000), Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
- "Cambodia: Strongman, Terrible Man, Invisible Man, and Politics Power Sharing", 2004, pp.73~86 (2004)
- "Cambodia's Democratic Transition to Neoauthoritarianism", 94(596), pp.425~429 (1995)