제도 대화에서의 질문유형과 효과성 분석: 국무총리 인사청문회를 중심으로
Analysis of Question Types and Their Effectiveness in Institutional Conversation: Focused on Confirmation Hearings for Prime Minister Nominees
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to analyze confirmation hearings for Prime Minister Nominees from the perspective of institutional conversation analysis, to identify what types of questions politicians use and their effectiveness related to the institutional context. The data consist of confirmation hearings for the 45th former Prime Minister Lee Nak-yon and the 46th former Prime Minister Chung Sye-kyun, and were transcribed and analyzed based on the transcription system suggested by Gail Jefferson. The findings show that a confirmation hearing is a highly institutionalized conversation that has legal regulations on the turn-taking system and time limit for speaking with a clear purpose of verifying the qualification of bureaucrat nominees. Questioners set topical agenda and strategically used questions in the form of polar, alternative, and close-ended with prefaced statements implying specific presuppositions to limit the nominees' answers. Questioners recognized and performed their role under the institutional context, and at the same time played the role of an intermediary relaying the answer to the listener outside the conversation situation. Questions have significance in that they are being used as an effective means to achieve the institutional purpose of the confirmation hearing system.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze confirmation hearings for Prime Minister Nominees from the perspective of institutional conversation analysis, to identify what types of questions politicians use and their effectiveness related to the institutional context. The data consist of confirmation hearings for the 45th former Prime Minister Lee Nak-yon and the 46th former Prime Minister Chung Sye-kyun, and were transcribed and analyzed based on the transcription system suggested by Gail Jefferson. The findings show that a confirmation hearing is a highly institutionalized conversation that has legal regulations on the turn-taking system and time limit for speaking with a clear purpose of verifying the qualification of bureaucrat nominees. Questioners set topical agenda and strategically used questions in the form of polar, alternative, and close-ended with prefaced statements implying specific presuppositions to limit the nominees' answers. Questioners recognized and performed their role under the institutional context, and at the same time played the role of an intermediary relaying the answer to the listener outside the conversation situation. Questions have significance in that they are being used as an effective means to achieve the institutional purpose of the confirmation hearing system.
참고문헌 (24)
- 김규현, "구어 자료의 전사 관행 . -담화 및 대화분석의 예를 중심으로", 언어사실과관점, 23(0), pp.77~102 (2009)
- 박기선, "한국어 교실의 수업 대화 분석 -학습자의 침묵 반응 요인을 중심으로-", 한국어교육, 23(3), pp.23~54 (2012), 국제한국어교육학회[DOI]
- 박용익, "의사-환자 대화의 제도적 특징과 유형학", 텍스트언어학, 21, pp.207~237 (2006), 한국텍스트언어학회
- 서경희, "적대성과 중립성의 조율-한국어 뉴스 인터뷰 진행자 질문을 중심으로-", 사회언어학, 22(3), pp.59~87 (2014), 한국사회언어학회
- 서민순, "의료대화의 구조와 기능에 대한 대화분석연구 － 초진대화를 중심으로", 독어학, (15), pp.163~179 (2007), 한국독어학회[DOI]
- 유현빈, "한국어 뉴스 인터뷰 대화에서 나타나는 관계 설정의 전환(footing shift): 인터뷰어의 질문을 중심으로", 사회언어학, 30(1), pp.211~237 (2022), 한국사회언어학회[DOI]
- 이원표, "한보청문회에서의 질문 분석: 제도 상황과 화자의 태도표현1", 사회언어학, 6(1), pp.26~52 (1998)
- 임동훈, "한국어의 문장 유형과 용법", 國語學, (60), pp.323~359 (2011), 국어학회[DOI]
- 정일섭, "인사청문회제도에 대한 연구", 한국지방자치학회보, 15(3), pp.191~208 (2003), 한국지방자치학회
- 진제희, "한국어 수업에 나타난 교사의 수정적 피드백과 학습자 반응 연구", 이중언어학, (28), pp.371~390 (2005), 이중언어학회
- Atkinson, John M., "Structures of Social Action : Studies in Conversation Analysis" (1984), Cambridge University Press
- Clayman, Steven, "Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of US Presidents Eisenhower and Reagan", Journal of communication, 52(4), pp.749~775 (2002)
- Drew, Paul, "Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings" (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Ekström, Mats, "News from the Interview Society" (2006), Nordicom
- Heritage, John, "The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content", Journal of pragmatics, 34(10-11), pp.1427~1446 (2002)
- Heritage, John, "Designing questions and setting agendas in the news interview", Studies in language and social interaction, pp.57~90 (2002)
- Heritage, John, "Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions" (2010), Wiley-Blackwell
- Heritage, John, "Discourse in Professional and Everyday Culture", pp.47~98 (1989)
- Levinson, Stephen C, "화용론" (1992), 한신문화사
- Mehan, Hugh, ""What Time Is It, Denise?": Asking Known Information Questions in Classroom Discourse", Theory Into Practice, 18(4), pp.285~294 (1979)
- Ochs, Elinor, "Strategies in Social Interaction", pp.44~55 (1978)
- Schegloff, Emanuel A, "Opening up Closings", 289~327 (1973)
- "이낙연 국무총리 후보자 인사청문회 (1부)｜특집 SBS 뉴스" (2017)[URL]
- "정세균 국무총리 후보자 국회 인사청문회 | SBS 모바일 24" (2020)[URL]