본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean delivery in tertiary care hospital in Thailand

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류산부인과학

초록

Objective To determine the decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) in emergency cesarean delivery and associated factors. Methods A total of 431 pregnant women who were indicated for emergency cesarean delivery were included. Clinical information and timing of process after decision until delivery and pregnancy outcomes were evaluated. Results Mean age was 30 years, and 59.4% were nulliparous. Mean gestational age at delivery was 37.9 weeks. The decision was made during normal office hour in 33.2%. Median decision-to-operating room interval, decision-to-incision interval, and DDIs were 45, 70, and 82 minutes, respectively. Only 3.5% of patients had DDI ≤30 minutes, while 52.0% had DDI >75 minutes. During after office hours, every time interval was significantly shorter and 4.9% had DDI ≤30 minutes compared to 0.7% in normal office hours (P=0.001). Compared to other indications, time intervals were significantly shorter in those with non-reassuring fetal heart rate (FHR), and DDI ≤30 minutes was achieved in 18.8% vs. 0.8% (P<0.001). Shortest DDI was observed among those with non-reassuring FHR during after office hours. Neonatal outcomes were comparable between different DDIs. Conclusion Only 3.5% of emergency cesarean delivery had a DDI ≤30 minutes (median 82 minutes). Significant shorter time intervals were observed in those with non-reassuring FHR during after office hours.

Abstract

Objective To determine the decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) in emergency cesarean delivery and associated factors. Methods A total of 431 pregnant women who were indicated for emergency cesarean delivery were included. Clinical information and timing of process after decision until delivery and pregnancy outcomes were evaluated. Results Mean age was 30 years, and 59.4% were nulliparous. Mean gestational age at delivery was 37.9 weeks. The decision was made during normal office hour in 33.2%. Median decision-to-operating room interval, decision-to-incision interval, and DDIs were 45, 70, and 82 minutes, respectively. Only 3.5% of patients had DDI ≤30 minutes, while 52.0% had DDI >75 minutes. During after office hours, every time interval was significantly shorter and 4.9% had DDI ≤30 minutes compared to 0.7% in normal office hours (P=0.001). Compared to other indications, time intervals were significantly shorter in those with non-reassuring fetal heart rate (FHR), and DDI ≤30 minutes was achieved in 18.8% vs. 0.8% (P<0.001). Shortest DDI was observed among those with non-reassuring FHR during after office hours. Neonatal outcomes were comparable between different DDIs. Conclusion Only 3.5% of emergency cesarean delivery had a DDI ≤30 minutes (median 82 minutes). Significant shorter time intervals were observed in those with non-reassuring FHR during after office hours.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics, "Guidelines for perinatal care", American Academy of Pediatrics, ~ (2002)
  2. Report of a joint working group: organization standards for maternity services, "Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology", Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Press, ~ (1995)
  3. Schauberger CW, "Emergency cesarean section and the 30-minute rule: definitions", Am J Perinatol, 26, pp.221~226 (2009)[DOI]
  4. Bruce D, "Evaluation of emergency caesarean sections--completion of the audit cycle in a Central London teaching hospital", J Obstet Gynaecol, 22, pp.273~278 (2002)[DOI]
  5. Helmy WH, "The decision-to-delivery interval for emergency caesarean section: is 30 minutes a realistic target?", BJOG, 109, pp.505~508 (2002)[DOI]
  6. Livermore LJ, "Decision to delivery interval: a retrospective study of 1,000 emergency caesarean sections", J Obstet Gynaecol, 26, pp.307~310 (2006)[DOI]
  7. Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, "Caesarean section: NICE clinical guideline 132", Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Press, ~ (2011)
  8. Leung TY, "Timing of caesarean section according to urgency", Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 27, pp.251~267 (2013)[DOI]
  9. Bloom SL, "Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes", Obstet Gynecol, 108, pp.6~11 (2006)[DOI]
  10. Tuffnell DJ, "Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section-are current standards achievable? Observational case series", BMJ, 322, pp.1330~1333 (2001)[DOI]
  11. Bello FA, "Decision-to-delivery intervals and perinatal outcomes following emergency cesarean delivery in a Nigerian tertiary hospital", Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 130, pp.279~283 (2015)[DOI]
  12. Chukwudi OE, "Decision - delivery interval and perinatal outcome of emergency caesarean sections at a tertiary institution", Pak J Med Sci, 30, pp.946~950 (2014)
  13. Onah HE, "Decision - delivery interval and perinatal outcome in emergency caesarean sections", J Obstet Gynaecol, 25, pp.342~346 (2005)[DOI]
  14. Boriboonhirunsarn D, "Decision-to-delivery interval in pregnant women with intrapartum non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns", J Eval Clin Pract, 22, pp.998~1002 (2016)
  15. American Academy of Pediatrics, "Guidelines for perinatal care", American Academy of Pediatrics, ~ (2012)
  16. Chauleur C, "Identification of factors influencing the decision-to-delivery interval in emergency caesarean sections", Gynecol Obstet Invest, 68, pp.248~254 (2009)[DOI]
  17. Sayegh I, "Evaluating the decision--to--delivery interval in emergency caesarean sections", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 116, pp.28~33 (2004)[DOI]
  18. MacKenzie IZ, "What is a reasonable time from decision-to-delivery by caesarean section? Evidence from 415 deliveries", BJOG, 109, pp.498~504 (2002)[DOI]
  19. Fuhrmann L, "Multidisciplinary team training reduces the decision-to-delivery interval for emergency caesarean section", Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 59, pp.1287~1295 (2015)[DOI]
  20. Weiner E, "The effect of a program to shorten the decision-to-delivery interval for emergent cesarean section on maternal and neonatal outcome", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 210, pp.224.e1~224.e6 (2014)[DOI]
  21. Hillemanns P, "Crash emergency cesarean section: decision-to-delivery interval under 30 min and its effect on Apgar and umbilical artery pH", Arch Gynecol Obstet, 273, pp.161~165 (2005)[DOI]
  22. Holcroft CJ, "Cord gas analysis, decision-to-delivery interval and the 30-minute rule for emergency cesareans", J Perinatol, 25, pp.616~ (2005)[DOI]
  23. Thomas J, "National cross sectional survey to determine whether the decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean section", BMJ, 328, pp.665~ (2004)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

응급제왕절개술의 적절성 여부에 관한 연구김상훈, 김평식, 박철홍, 서용수, 신정환, 육진성, 홍서유대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2005 · 제48권 제1호Maternal and neonatal morbidities associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor around termEui Hyeok Kim, Hanna Moon, Ji Hyun Lee대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2023 · 제66권 제1호Fetal and maternal outcomes of segmental uterine resection in emergency and planned placenta percreta deliveriesAli Acar, Aslı Altinordu Atci, Fatih Akkuş, Mehmet Uyar, Şükran Doğru, Ülfet Sena Metin대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2024 · 제67권 제1호Secular trends in cesarean sections and risk factors in South Korea (2006–2015)김진실, 김해중, 김호연, 노은진, 안기훈, 오민정, 이도겸, 조금준, 홍순철대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2020 · 제63권 제4호Obstetric outcome of induction of labor using prostaglandin gel in patients with previous one cesarean sectionMukesh Sangwan, Pinki Lakra, Rajiv Mahendru, Sanjeet Singh, Sunita Siwach, Vijayata Sangwan대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2019 · 제62권 제6호Prediction Model for Massive Transfusion in Placenta Previa during Cesarean Section어영, 강대용, 강지은, 김혜심, 박은영, 이은비, 이향아, 정인배, 최성진, 한경희연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2020 · 제61권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)