Fetal and maternal outcomes of segmental uterine resection in emergency and planned placenta percreta deliveries
Fetal and maternal outcomes of Segmental uterine resection in emergency and planned placenta percreta deliveries
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective This study evaluated maternal and fetal outcomes of emergency uterine resection versus planned segmental uterine resection in patients with placenta percreta (PPC) and placenta previa (PP). Methods Patients with PP and PPC who underwent planned or emergency segmental uterine resection were included in this study. Demographic data, hemorrhagic morbidities, intra- and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, surgical duration, and peri- and neonatal morbidities were compared. Results A total of 141 PPC and PP cases were included in this study. Twenty-five patients (17.73%) underwent emergency uterine resection, while 116 (82.27%) underwent planned segmental uterine resections. The postoperative hemoglobin changes, operation times, total blood transfusion, bladder injury, and length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between groups (P=0.7, P=0.6, P=0.9, P=0.9, and P=0.2, respectively). Fetal weights, 5-minute Apgar scores, and neonatal intensive care unit admission rates did not differ significantly between groups. The gestational age at delivery of patients presenting with bleeding was lower than that of patients who were admitted in active labor and underwent elective surgery (32 weeks [95% confidence interval [CI], 26-37] vs. 35 weeks [95% CI, 34-35]; P=0.037). Conclusion Using a multidisciplinary approach, this study performed at a tertiary center showed that maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality did not differ significantly between emergency versus planned segmental uterine resection.
Abstract
Objective This study evaluated maternal and fetal outcomes of emergency uterine resection versus planned segmental uterine resection in patients with placenta percreta (PPC) and placenta previa (PP). Methods Patients with PP and PPC who underwent planned or emergency segmental uterine resection were included in this study. Demographic data, hemorrhagic morbidities, intra- and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, surgical duration, and peri- and neonatal morbidities were compared. Results A total of 141 PPC and PP cases were included in this study. Twenty-five patients (17.73%) underwent emergency uterine resection, while 116 (82.27%) underwent planned segmental uterine resections. The postoperative hemoglobin changes, operation times, total blood transfusion, bladder injury, and length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between groups (P=0.7, P=0.6, P=0.9, P=0.9, and P=0.2, respectively). Fetal weights, 5-minute Apgar scores, and neonatal intensive care unit admission rates did not differ significantly between groups. The gestational age at delivery of patients presenting with bleeding was lower than that of patients who were admitted in active labor and underwent elective surgery (32 weeks [95% confidence interval [CI], 26-37] vs. 35 weeks [95% CI, 34-35]; P=0.037). Conclusion Using a multidisciplinary approach, this study performed at a tertiary center showed that maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality did not differ significantly between emergency versus planned segmental uterine resection.
참고문헌 (29)
- Mogos MF, "Recent trends in placenta accreta in the United States and its impact on maternal-fetal morbidity and healthcare-associated costs, 1998-2011", J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 29, pp.1077~1082 (2016)
- Jauniaux E, "Prevalence and main outcomes of placenta accreta spectrum : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 221, pp.208~218 (2019)
- Goffman D, "Obstetric hemorrhage : a global review", Semin Perinatol, 40, pp.96~98 (2016)
- Erfani H, "Placenta previa without morbidly adherent placenta : comparison of characteristics and outcomes between planned and emergent deliveries in a tertiary center", J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 32, pp.906~909 (2019)
- Durukan H, "Planned versus urgent deliveries in placenta previa : maternal, surgical and neonatal results", Arch Gynecol Obstet, 300, pp.1541~1549 (2019)
- Jauniaux E, "A comparison of recent guidelines in the diagnosis and management of placenta accreta spectrum disorders", Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 72, pp.102~116 (2021)
- Acar A, "Conservative management of placental invasion anomalies with an intracavitary suture technique", Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 143, pp.184~190 (2018)
- Varlas VN, "Maternal and fetal outcome in placenta accreta spectrum(PAS)associated with placenta previa : a retrospective analysis from a tertiary center", J Med Life, 14, pp.367~375 (2021)
- Obstetric care consensus no, "7 : placenta accreta spectrum", Obstet Gynecol, 132, pp.e259~e275 (2018)
- Daney de Marcillac F, "Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with conservative management for placenta morbidly adherent(accreta)diagnosed during pregnancy. Report of 15 cases", J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod(Paris), 45, pp.849~858 (2016)
- Pegu B, "Placenta accreta spectrum-a catastrophic situation in obstetrics", Obstet Gynecol Sci, 64, pp.239~247 (2021)
- Ma Y, "An analysis of maternalfetal prognosis in patients with placenta accreta", J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 34, pp.725~731 (2021)
- Shamshirsaz AA, "Outcomes of planned compared with urgent deliveries using a multidisciplinary team approach for morbidly adherent placenta", Obstet Gynecol, 131, pp.234~241 (2018)
- Morlando M, "Maternal and neonatal outcomes in planned versus emergency cesarean delivery for placenta accreta spectrum : a multinational database study", Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 100(Suppl 1), pp.41~49 (2021)
- Jauniaux E, "FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders : epidemiology", Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 140, pp.265~273 (2018)
- Doğru Ş, "Use of ureteral catheter in uterine-sparing surgery for placenta accreta", Perinat J, 30, pp.158~164 (2022)
- Dawood AS, "Evaluation of three-step procedure(Shehata’s technique)as a conservative management for placenta accreta at a tertiary care hospital in Egypt", J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod, 48, pp.201~205 (2019)
- Kilicci C, "Planned cesarean hysterectomy versus modified form of segmental resection in patients with placenta percreta", J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 31, pp.2935~2940 (2018)
- Karaman E, "Local resection may be a strong alternative to cesarean hysterectomy in conservative surgical management of placenta percreta : experiences from a tertiary hospital", J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 30, pp.947~952 (2017)
- Jolley JA, "Management of placenta accreta : a survey of maternal-fetal medicine practitioners", J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 25, pp.756~760 (2012)
- Eller AG, "Maternal morbidity in cases of placenta accreta managed by a multidisciplinary care team compared with standard obstetric care", Obstet Gynecol, 117, pp.331~337 (2011)
- Shamshirsaz AA, "Multidisciplinary team learning in the management of the morbidly adherent placenta : outcome improvements over time", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 216, pp.612~ (2017)
- Thang NM, "Emergent versus planned delivery in patients with placenta accreta spectrum disorders : a retrospective study", Medicine(Baltimore), 100, pp.e28353~ (2021)
- Bowman ZS, "Risk factors for unscheduled delivery in patients with placenta accreta", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 210, pp.241~ (2014)
- Wang Y, "An observation study of the emergency intervention in placenta accreta spectrum", Arch Gynecol Obstet, 299, pp.1579~1586 (2019)
- Flores-Mendoza H, "Outcomes in emergency versus electively scheduled cases of placenta accreta spectrum disorder managed by cesarean-hysterectomy within a multidisciplinary care team", Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 159, pp.404~411 (2022)
- Warshak CR, "Effect of predelivery diagnosis in 99 consecutive cases of placenta accreta", Obstet Gynecol, 115, pp.65~69 (2010)
- Erfani H, "Maternal outcomes in unexpected placenta accreta spectrum disorders : single-center experience with a multidisciplinary team", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 221, pp.337~ (2019)
- Meller CH, "Timing of delivery in placenta accreta", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 211, pp.438~439 (2014)