Obstetric outcome of induction of labor using prostaglandin gel in patients with previous one cesarean section
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
ObjectiveAfter globally acceptance of planned vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC), the mode of induction is still amatter of debate and requires further discussion. We aimed to study obstetric outcomes in post-cesarean patientsundergoing induction of labor with prostaglandin gel compared with patients who developed spontaneous laborpains. MethodsAll patients at 34 weeks or more of gestation with previous one cesarean section eligible for trial of labor aftercesarean section admitted in a labor room within one year were divided in 2 groups. Group one consisted of patientswho experienced the spontaneous onset of labor pains and group 2 consisted of patients who underwent inductionof labor with prostaglandin gel. They were analyzed for maternofetal outcomes. Descriptive statistics, independentsample t-test, and chi-square test were applied using SPSS 20 software for statistical analysis. ResultsBoth groups were comparable in maternal age, parity, and fetal weight, but different in bishop score, mode ofdelivery, and neonatal outcome. Admisson bishop score was 6.61±2.51 in group 1 and 3.15±1.27 in group 2 (P<0.005). In the patients who experienced spontaneous labor, 86.82% had successful VBAC. In the patients with induced labor,64.34% had successful VBAC with an average dose of gel of 1.65±0.75. Both groups had one case each of uterinerupture. The neonatal intensive care unit admission rate was 4.1% in group one and 10.4% in group 2. ConclusionThis study reflects that supervised labor induction with prostaglandin gel in previous one cesarean section patients isa safe and effective option.
Abstract
ObjectiveAfter globally acceptance of planned vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC), the mode of induction is still amatter of debate and requires further discussion. We aimed to study obstetric outcomes in post-cesarean patientsundergoing induction of labor with prostaglandin gel compared with patients who developed spontaneous laborpains. MethodsAll patients at 34 weeks or more of gestation with previous one cesarean section eligible for trial of labor aftercesarean section admitted in a labor room within one year were divided in 2 groups. Group one consisted of patientswho experienced the spontaneous onset of labor pains and group 2 consisted of patients who underwent inductionof labor with prostaglandin gel. They were analyzed for maternofetal outcomes. Descriptive statistics, independentsample t-test, and chi-square test were applied using SPSS 20 software for statistical analysis. ResultsBoth groups were comparable in maternal age, parity, and fetal weight, but different in bishop score, mode ofdelivery, and neonatal outcome. Admisson bishop score was 6.61±2.51 in group 1 and 3.15±1.27 in group 2 (P<0.005). In the patients who experienced spontaneous labor, 86.82% had successful VBAC. In the patients with induced labor,64.34% had successful VBAC with an average dose of gel of 1.65±0.75. Both groups had one case each of uterinerupture. The neonatal intensive care unit admission rate was 4.1% in group one and 10.4% in group 2. ConclusionThis study reflects that supervised labor induction with prostaglandin gel in previous one cesarean section patients isa safe and effective option.
참고문헌 (25)
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, "New VBAC guidelines", ACOG, ~
- Cohen B, "Brief history of vaginal birth after cesarean section", Clin Obstet Gynecol, 44, pp.604~608 (2001)
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, "Birth after previous cesarean birth" (2015), RCOG
- Betran AP, "What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies", Reprod Health, 12, pp.57~ (2015)
- Ye J, "Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century : a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data", BJOG, 123, pp.745~753 (2016)
- Guise JM, "Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean : a systematic review", Obstet Gynecol, 103, pp.420~429 (2004)
- Mozurkewich EL, "Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor : a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 183, pp.1187~1197 (2000)
- Yogev Y, "Induction of labor with prostaglandin E2 in women with previous cesarean section and unfavorable cervix", Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 116, pp.173~176 (2004)
- Qahtani NA, "Induction of labor with PGE2 after one previous cesarean section : 18years experience in a university hospital", Int J Clin Med, 2, pp.35~39 (2011)
- Balachandran L, "Pregnancy outcome in women with previous one cesarean section", J Clin Diagn Res, 8, pp.99~102 (2014)
- Doshi HU, "Prognostic factors for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section — analysis of 162 cases", J Obstet Gynaecol India, 60, pp.498~502 (2010)
- Bujold E, "Trial of labor in patients with a previous cesarean section : does maternal age influence the outcome", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 190, pp.1113~1118 (2004)
- Landon MB, "The MFMU cesarean registry : factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 193, pp.1016~1023 (2005)
- King DE, "Socioeconomic factors and the odds of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery", JAMA, 272, pp.524~529 (1994)
- Abdelazim IA, "Maternal and obstetrical factors associated with a successful trial of vaginal birth after cesarean section", J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc, 15, pp.245~249 (2014)
- Harper LM, "Association of induction of labor and uterine rupture in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean : a survival analysis", Am J Obstet Gynecol, 206, pp.51~ (2012)[DOI]
- Guise JM, "Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights", Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep), pp.1~397 (2010)
- Leduc D, "Induction of labour. SOGC clinical practice guidelines. No. 296, September 2013", J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 36, pp.248~252 (2013)
- Mozurkewich EL, "Methods of induction of labour : a systematic review", BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 11, pp.84~103 (2011)
- Schmitz T, "Cervical ripening with low-dose prostaglandins in planned vaginal birth after cesarean", PLoS One, 8, pp.e80903~ (2013)
- Haas J, "Safety of low-dose prostaglandin E2 induction in grandmultiparous women with previous cesarean delivery", J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 27, pp.445~448 (2014)
- Landon MB, "Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery", N Engl J Med, 351, pp.2581~2589 (2004)
- Reif P, "Labour and childbirth after previous caesarean section : recommendations of the Austrian Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology(OEGGG)", Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, 76, pp.1279~1286 (2016)
- Bharatam KK, "Cesarean section uterine scar dehiscence-a review", Uterus Ovary, 2, pp.e751~ (2015)
- Chauhan SP, "Induction of labor in the United States : a critical appraisal of appropriateness and reducibility", Semin Perinatol, 36, pp.336~343 (2012)