본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

자기복구형 에너지소산 가새시스템을 적용한 종합병원의 내진보강효과

Seismic Retrofitting Effects of General Hospital Using Self-Centering Energy Dissipative Bracing System

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류토목공학

초록

2016 Gyeongju and 2017 Pohang earthquakes led Koreans to acknowledge that the Korean peninsula is not an earthquake-free zone anymore. Among various buildings crucial to after-shock recovery, general hospital buildings, especially existing old ones, are very significant so seismic retrofitting of those must be an important issue. Self-centering energy dissipative(SCED) brace is one of retrofitting methods, which consists of tendon with restoring force and friction device capable of dissipating seismic energy. The strength of the SCED brace is that the tendon forces a structure to go back to the original position, which means residual drift can be negligible. The residual drift is a very important parameter to determine usableness of general hospitals after shock. To the contrary, buckling-restrained braces(BRB) are also a very effective way to retrofit because they can resist both compressive and tensile, but residual drift may exist when the steel core yields. On this background, the seismic retrofitting effect of general hospitals reinforced with SCED braces was investigated and compared to that of the BRD in this study. As a result, although the floor acceleration cannot be reduced, the story drift and residual drift, and the shear demand of walls significantly decreased. Consequently, seismic retrofitting by SCED braces are very effective for domestic low-rise general hospitals.

Abstract

2016 Gyeongju and 2017 Pohang earthquakes led Koreans to acknowledge that the Korean peninsula is not an earthquake-free zone anymore. Among various buildings crucial to after-shock recovery, general hospital buildings, especially existing old ones, are very significant so seismic retrofitting of those must be an important issue. Self-centering energy dissipative(SCED) brace is one of retrofitting methods, which consists of tendon with restoring force and friction device capable of dissipating seismic energy. The strength of the SCED brace is that the tendon forces a structure to go back to the original position, which means residual drift can be negligible. The residual drift is a very important parameter to determine usableness of general hospitals after shock. To the contrary, buckling-restrained braces(BRB) are also a very effective way to retrofit because they can resist both compressive and tensile, but residual drift may exist when the steel core yields. On this background, the seismic retrofitting effect of general hospitals reinforced with SCED braces was investigated and compared to that of the BRD in this study. As a result, although the floor acceleration cannot be reduced, the story drift and residual drift, and the shear demand of walls significantly decreased. Consequently, seismic retrofitting by SCED braces are very effective for domestic low-rise general hospitals.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. "List of domestic earthquakes"[URL]
  2. KIPA, "2017 Winter KIPA News letter", The Korea Institute of Public Administration, ~ (2017)
  3. Kim SD, "Introduction and application of bucklingrestrained brace", Review of Architecture and Building Science, 49(8), pp.124~126 (2005)
  4. Component testing, stability analysis and characterization of buckling restrained unbonded braces, "Black C", PEERC, University of California at Berkeley, ~, pp.Report No. PEER-2002 (2002), 08
  5. Christopoulos C, "Self-centering energy dissipative bracing system for the seismic resistance of structures", Journal of Structural Engineering, 134(1), pp.96~107 (2008)
  6. Tremblay R, "Seismic response of multistory buildings with self-centering energy dissipative steel braces", Journal of Structural Engineering, 134(1), pp.108~120 (2008)
  7. Dong H, "Performance of an innovative self-centering buckling restrained brace for mitigating seismic responses of bridge structures with double-column piers", Engineering Structures, 148, pp.47~62 (2017)
  8. 김진구, "비정형 셀프센터링 가새골조의 비탄성 지진응답", 한국지진공학회논문집, 12(4), pp.35~44 (2008), 한국지진공학회
  9. 김태완, "중층 종합병원 건물의 내진성능평가", 한국지진공학회논문집, 21(5), pp.245~254 (2017), 한국지진공학회
  10. 김태완, "가속도에 민감한 종합병원 의료 및 기계설비의 내진성능평가", 한국지진공학회논문집, 22(4), pp.235~244 (2018), 한국지진공학회[DOI]
  11. CSI, "Perform-3D, Nonlinear analysis and performance assessment for 3D structures, user guide version 6", Computers and Structures Inc
  12. Erochko J., "Improvements to the design and use of post-tentioned self-centering energy-dissipative (SCED) braces", Ph.D, pp.2013
  13. Modelisation du Comportement d’une Diagonale de Contreventement SCED avec le Logiciel d’Analyse Structurale SAP2000. (Rapport No. GRS SR10-02). Montreal: Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Departement des genies civil, geologique et des mines, "Le Bec A", University of Toronto Department of Civil Engineering, ~, pp.Publication No. 2010-05 (2010)
  14. EESK, "Guidelines for seismic evaluation of existing buildings", ~ (2018)
  15. 김대환, "국내 지진재해도를 고려한 저층 필로티 건물의 붕괴 확률", 한국지진공학회논문집, 20(7), pp.485~494 (2016), 한국지진공학회
  16. "Peer strong motion database"[URL]
  17. Korea Construction Standards Center (KCSC)., "KDS 41 30 00", ~ (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)