“외국문화로서의 한국문화”교육의 가능성
Methodology of teaching korean culture as a foreign culture.
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this work is to determine the feasibility of Korean Culture as a Foreign Culture (KCFC) education. Until now, the trend of Korean cultural studies in general has been to view it as existing within a fixed regional space with an embodied shape as a conclusive reality and to attempt to objectively grasp an understanding of that reality. Because it was unable to objectify, delocalize, and alienate, KCFC was left simply as a vehicle of Korean as a Foreign Language (KFL) education. Therefore the position, the boundary, and methods of Korean culture studies need to be changed. First, the territory of Korean culture from the Korean peninsula needs to be expanded to include the countries of East Asia as well as the ever expanding realm of cyberspace; second, the communicational means for conveying the facts about Korean culture needs to be expanded from the Korean language to include all other languages; third, the sovereignty over Korean culture needs to be expanded from the ethnic Korean people to include all people who participate in shaping Korean culture. In order to implement this paradigm shift, I present the following five step KCFC education process. 1. Adequate provision of facts about Korean culture 2. The re-evaluation of cultural knowledge based on the Korean viewpoint as an outsider’s viewpoint 3. Comparison of Korean culture with the learner’s culture 4. The re-evaluation of the learner’s culture as an outsider’s viewpoint 5. Defining the universality of Korean culture in terms of human relations The remaining problems are related to the concreteness of the education field. Currently the tasks that must be done are establishing a curriculum and related studies, and devising teaching methods that are in accord with the learner’s level. The most important requirement, however, is the training of teachers for KCFC education. Just as KFC has established its independence and disciplinary field distinct from National Korean Language studies, KCFC must also become independent from National Korean culture studies and establish its own field. Then it will no longer be just a tool in language education and will be able to acquire its own autonomous identity.
Abstract
The purpose of this work is to determine the feasibility of Korean Culture as a Foreign Culture (KCFC) education. Until now, the trend of Korean cultural studies in general has been to view it as existing within a fixed regional space with an embodied shape as a conclusive reality and to attempt to objectively grasp an understanding of that reality. Because it was unable to objectify, delocalize, and alienate, KCFC was left simply as a vehicle of Korean as a Foreign Language (KFL) education. Therefore the position, the boundary, and methods of Korean culture studies need to be changed. First, the territory of Korean culture from the Korean peninsula needs to be expanded to include the countries of East Asia as well as the ever expanding realm of cyberspace; second, the communicational means for conveying the facts about Korean culture needs to be expanded from the Korean language to include all other languages; third, the sovereignty over Korean culture needs to be expanded from the ethnic Korean people to include all people who participate in shaping Korean culture. In order to implement this paradigm shift, I present the following five step KCFC education process. 1. Adequate provision of facts about Korean culture 2. The re-evaluation of cultural knowledge based on the Korean viewpoint as an outsider’s viewpoint 3. Comparison of Korean culture with the learner’s culture 4. The re-evaluation of the learner’s culture as an outsider’s viewpoint 5. Defining the universality of Korean culture in terms of human relations The remaining problems are related to the concreteness of the education field. Currently the tasks that must be done are establishing a curriculum and related studies, and devising teaching methods that are in accord with the learner’s level. The most important requirement, however, is the training of teachers for KCFC education. Just as KFC has established its independence and disciplinary field distinct from National Korean Language studies, KCFC must also become independent from National Korean culture studies and establish its own field. Then it will no longer be just a tool in language education and will be able to acquire its own autonomous identity.
참고문헌 (21)
- 김광억, "한국인류학의 반성과 과제", 현상과 인식, 19(2), pp.75~102 (1995)
- 김중순, "비교철학적 관점에서 본 언어과학의 정체성 해명", 언어과학연구, 25, pp.45~68 (2003), 언어과학회
- 문옥표, "인류학, 현대문화분석, 한국학", 한국의 사회와 문화, 23, pp.49~84 (1995)
- 박영순, "한국어교육을 위한 한국문화론" (2006), 한림출판사
- 박영순, "우리가 정말 알아야 할 한국문화" (2008), 현암사
- 유홍림, "다문화주의와 한국사회", 전통과 현대, 4, pp.106~119 (1998)
- 윤택림, "문화의 탈지역화와 한국문화연구", 정신문화연구, 25(3) (2002)
- 이황, "성학십도: 열 가지 그림으로 읽는 성리학" (2005), 풀빛
- 임재해, "한국 민중문화와 민속문화, 그리고 민족문화", 전통과 현대, 4, pp.52~75 (1998)
- 임재해, "지방화와 정치사회의식의 전환-대구경북지역의 대학과 언론을 중심으로-", 한국학논집, 33(33), pp.335~392 (2006), 한국학연구원
- 전경수, "굴절과 파행의 한국인류학 100년(4)", 한국학보, 89, pp.135~245 (1997)
- 조동일, "세계·지방화시대의 한국학 6: 비교연구의 방법" (2007), 계명대학교 출판부
- 최협, "지역사회연구의 인류학적 과제와 방법론적 쟁점", 정신문화연구, 19(3), pp.133~149 (1996)
- 한상복, "한국 문화인류학 30년", 한국문화인류학, 20, pp.57~76 (1980)
- 콰메 앤터니 애피아, "실천철학연구회 옮김(2008), 세계시민주의 바이북스, 211-242", ~ (2008)
- Appadurai, Arjun, "Global ethnoscapes: Note and queries for a transnational anthropology, Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present", pp.191~210 (1991), School of American Research Press
- Hall, Steward, "Cultural studies: Two Paradigms, Media, Culture and Society" (1986), Sage
- Kroeber, A L, "Culture: A Critical review of concepts and definitions. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology 47(1)", ~ (1952)
- Marcus, George E, "Anthropology as cultural Critique" (1986), The University of Chicago Press
- Sasse, Werner, "Teaching Korean Culture through Korean Studies", Korea Journal, 36(3), pp.20~39. (1996)
- Turner, Terence, "Anthropology and multiculturalism: What is anthropology the multiculturalists should be mindful of it", Cultural Anthropology, 8(4), pp.411~429 (1993)
