본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

複数のカテゴリーに属する単一形式の文法化 -言語類型論の観点から-

Grammaticalization of a single form that belongs to multiple grammatical categories -From the perspective of typology-

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

This paper clarifies the grammaticalization of a single form that belongs to multiple grammatical categories, specifically considering the so-called sono-ta hitei expressions hoka, kiri, shika, and pakk-ey ‘only’ in Japanese and Korean. These expressions behave as both negative polarity items (NPIs) and adverbial particles. The arguments of this paper are as follow: (i)These expressions are characterized by the following generalizations: The grammaticalization of adverbial particles and NPIs occurs at about the same time. Likewise, degrammaticalization of these grammar categories also occurs at around the same time. (ii)The reason for this could be that adverbial particles and NPIs belong to the same category, that is, the minor category. (iii)If a single grammatical form has more than one minor category, these categories possess a strong grammatical feature like a group. Therefore, they behave in the same manner when entering or exiting a minor category.

Abstract

This paper clarifies the grammaticalization of a single form that belongs to multiple grammatical categories, specifically considering the so-called sono-ta hitei expressions hoka, kiri, shika, and pakk-ey ‘only’ in Japanese and Korean. These expressions behave as both negative polarity items (NPIs) and adverbial particles. The arguments of this paper are as follow: (i)These expressions are characterized by the following generalizations: The grammaticalization of adverbial particles and NPIs occurs at about the same time. Likewise, degrammaticalization of these grammar categories also occurs at around the same time. (ii)The reason for this could be that adverbial particles and NPIs belong to the same category, that is, the minor category. (iii)If a single grammatical form has more than one minor category, these categories possess a strong grammatical feature like a group. Therefore, they behave in the same manner when entering or exiting a minor category.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. 박강훈, "한일 양 언어의 부정순환에 관한 대조연구- 언어유형론적 관점에서 -", 비교일본학, 40, pp.257~274 (2017), 일본학국제비교연구소
  2. 박강훈, "언어접촉의 관점에서 본 현대일본어의 통사 변화", 日本語文學, 1(76), pp.3~25 (2018), 한국일본어문학회[DOI]
  3. 박승윤, "밖에의 문법화 현상", 언어, 22(1), pp.57~70 (1997)
  4. 시정곤, "‘밖에’의 형태-통사론", 국어학, 30, pp.171~200 (1997)
  5. 홍사만, "국어 특수조사 신연구", pp.1~424 (2002), 역락
  6. 構成要素と句構造(1), 科学研究費補助金(基盤研究C(2)) 研究成果報告書, "牛江一裕", 1~16 (2001)
  7. 江口正, "「ほか」の2用法について", 紀要(言語・文学), 32, pp.291~310 (2000), 愛知県立大学外国語学部
  8. 片岡喜代子, "日本語否定文の構造:かき混ぜ文と否定呼応表現", pp.1~282 (2006), くろしお出版
  9. 此島正年, "国語助詞の研究─助詞史素描", pp.1~484 (1966), 桜楓社
  10. 沼田善子, "現代日本語とりたて詞の研究", pp.1~280 (2009), ひつじ出版
  11. 宮地朝子, "日本語助詞シカに関わる構文構造史的研究-文法史構築の一試論-", pp.1~219 (2007), ひつじ書房
  12. 茂木俊伸, "とりたて詞の解釈と構造", 박사, 人文社会科学研究科, pp.2004
  13. 朴江訓, "「しか・・ない」の「多重NPI」現象について", 日本語文法, 7(2), pp.61~81 (2007), くおしお出版
  14. 박강훈, "いわゆる「其他否定」表現について", 일어일문학연구, 69(1), pp.123~138 (2009), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
  15. 박강훈, "「しか」の機能的源流をめぐって -韓国語との対照の観点から-", 일본연구, (49), pp.415~433 (2011), 일본연구소[DOI]
  16. 박강훈, "韓日両言語における除外表現の文法化 -言語類型論的観点から-", 일본어학연구, (35), pp.137~151 (2012), 한국일본어학회
  17. 박강훈, "限定を表す副助詞における上接語句の文法化", 일어일문학연구, 89(1), pp.21~39 (2014), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
  18. 박강훈, "韓日両言語における副助詞の文法化 -言語類型論の観点から-", 日本語文學, 1(61), pp.37~56 (2014), 한국일본어문학회
  19. 박강훈, "韓日両言語における文法化の対照研究の諸相", 日本語文學, 1(64), pp.33~52 (2015), 한국일본어문학회
  20. 朴江訓, "現代日本語における否定極性表現「きり」の脱文法化", 韓国日語日文学会proceedings, pp.140~146 (2015)
  21. 박강훈, "韓日両言語の方言接触における対照研究 ―否定極性表現の場合を中心に―", 日本文化學報, (82), pp.141~162 (2019), 한국일본문화학회[DOI]
  22. 山口堯二, "副助詞「しか」の源流-その他を否定する表現法の広がり-", 語源探求, 3, pp.34~48 (1991), 明治書院
  23. 山田孝, "日本口語法講義", pp.1~398 (1922), 宝文館出版
  24. 渡辺ゆかり, "付属語「きり」の用法の変遷について-江戸語・東京語を中心に-", 日本語科学, 12, pp.128~152 (2002)
  25. Furukawa, Yukio, "A Negative Concord Approach to SIKA-NAI Construction", 日本言語学会第123回大会予稿集, pp.164~169 (2001)
  26. Hopper, Paul J, "Grammaticalization", pp.1~298 (2003), CUP
  27. Kim, Alan Hyun-Oak, "The NPI Pakkey and Universal Quantifier Negation in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 6, pp.323~337 (1997)
  28. Konomi, Keiji, "On Licensing of SIKA-NPIs in Japanese, Syntactic and Functional Explorations", pp.51~82 (2000), Kurosio Publishers
  29. Nishioka, Nobuaki, "Japanese Negative Polarity Items wh-MO and XP-sika Phrases, Syntactic and Functional Explorations", pp.159~184 (2000), Kurosio Publishers
  30. Park, Kanghun, "A Contrastive Study of Japanese and Korean Negative Sensitive Items: a Grammaticalization Approach", Language Sciences, 45, pp.152~172 (2014), Elsevier
  31. Park, Kanghun, "A Discrepancy in the Degree of Grammaticalization of Korean and Japanese Negative Sensitive Items: A Corpus-Based Study", Japanese and Korean Linguistics, 22, pp.149~164 (2015), CSLI Publications
  32. 박강훈, "Negative concord vs. negative polarity: Focusing on argument-adjunct asymmetry", 언어연구, 34(2), pp.225~246 (2017), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  33. Park, Kanghun, "Degrammaticalization of Japanese NSI kiri-nai", 1~20
  34. "大辞泉", 小学館, ~ (2013)
  35. "日本国語大事典", 小学館, ~ (2003)
  36. "日本文法大辞典", 明治書院, ~ (1971)
  37. "中納言日本語諸方言コーパス COJADS", ~
  38. "少納言現代日本語書き言葉均衡 コーパスKOTONOHA", ~
  39. "青空文庫"[URL]
  40. "朝日新聞記事データベース「聞蔵II」", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)