‘지다’ 구문의 영어번역문에 대한 기능문법적 분석
A Functional Analysis of the English Translations of Korean ‘cita’ Constructions
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Eunil Kim (2007), A Functional Analysis of the English Translations of Korean ‘cita’ Constructions. Journal of Language Sciences 14-2, 23～42. The purpose of this study is to provide a functional account of the English translations of Korean ‘cita’ constructions. Previous studies have shown that ‘cita’ constructions have four different functions: passive, inchoative, nonautonomous, and non-volitional. The analysis of our Korean-English parallel corpus shows that ‘cita’ constructions are translated into five different types of English constructions: passives, transitive clauses, intransitive clauses, copular verb construction, and modality verb construction. It is argued that English does not have a grammatical device to systematically encode semantic domains such as non-volitional, empathy defocusing and controllability defocusing in such a way that Korean ‘cita’ construction does, and that the five construction types of English translations are functionally motivated by discourse-pragmatic factors such as topicality of participants and discourse markers as well as by semantic factors such as subtle differences in meaning reflected in the change of state. (Pukyong National University)
Abstract
Eunil Kim (2007), A Functional Analysis of the English Translations of Korean ‘cita’ Constructions. Journal of Language Sciences 14-2, 23～42. The purpose of this study is to provide a functional account of the English translations of Korean ‘cita’ constructions. Previous studies have shown that ‘cita’ constructions have four different functions: passive, inchoative, nonautonomous, and non-volitional. The analysis of our Korean-English parallel corpus shows that ‘cita’ constructions are translated into five different types of English constructions: passives, transitive clauses, intransitive clauses, copular verb construction, and modality verb construction. It is argued that English does not have a grammatical device to systematically encode semantic domains such as non-volitional, empathy defocusing and controllability defocusing in such a way that Korean ‘cita’ construction does, and that the five construction types of English translations are functionally motivated by discourse-pragmatic factors such as topicality of participants and discourse markers as well as by semantic factors such as subtle differences in meaning reflected in the change of state. (Pukyong National University)
참고문헌 (15)
- "기능문법과 영어교육", 27, pp.105~121 (2002)
- "수동구문의 기능과 부호화차이: 한영 병렬언어자료의 분석", 41, pp.89~110 (2005)
- "한국어 ‘-게 되다’구문의 영어번역문에 대한 기능문법적 분석", 48(1), pp.159~180 (2006)
- "국어문법(수정증보판)" (1996)
- "용언 ‘지다’의 의미와 기본 기능", pp.39~67 (1993)
- "조동사 ‘지다’의 의미 연구", pp.537~569 (1978)
- "한국의 언어" (1997), 서울: 신구문화사
- "Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English" (1999), Harlow, Essex: Longman
- "Some Thoughts on Agentivity Journal of Linguistics 9", pp.11~23 (1973)
- "Meaning and the Structure of Language The University of Chicago Press" (1975)
- "Topic Continuity in Discourse Typological Studies in Language Series 3" (1983), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- "Guide to Patterns and Usage in English" (1980), Oxford University Press
- "Two Constrasting Types of Linguistic Representation The Empire of Signs Semiotic Essays on Japanese Culture", pp.285~326 (1991), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- "A Grammar of Contemporary English" (1972), Seminar Press
- "Animacy and Reference: A Cognitive Approach to Corpus Linguistics (Studies in Language Companion Series 46)" (1999), Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company