從後移民看華文書寫:以北美地區華人學者史書美與華人作家嚴歌苓、張翎爲中心
Reading Chinese Writing from the Perspective of Post-immigration: Focusing on the North American Chinese Scholar Shu-mei Shih and the Chinese Writer Yan Geling and Zhang Ling
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As an emerging research method, the proposed of “Sinophone literature” has aroused controversy from the beginning. As advocate of Sinophone literature, Professor. Shu-Mei Shih tries to criticize “Sinocentrism”, “Chineseness” and “Territorialism” by applying the Post-colonialism and Ethnic Minority Literature on the “Sinophone literature”. Professor David Der-wei Wang regarded “Sinophone literature” as a field and a method. The dialogue between Sinophone literature and Chinese literature could communicate with each other through this method and develop a cross-national geographical map of literature in the new era. The “Loyalism” (the immigrant, the loyalist and the foreigner) proposed by Professor David Wang could be identified as three different political identities, and especially the “loyalist” is strongly indicating a political meaning. In this paper, it is proposed that there would be “loyalist consciousness” which derived from Professor David Wang’s “Loyalism”, and become the immigrant consciousness, loyalist consciousness and foreigner consciousness. These three kinds of consciousness are in a trinity with the relationship of immigrants. Nowadays, because of the convenient transportation and economic development, immigrants enter to the post-immigration era, and the “post-loyalist consciousness” is born. This paper tries to elaborate the “Loyalist consciousness” and “Post-loyalist consciousness” with Professor David Wang’s “Loyalism” and how these kinds of consciousness are related to the identity and how they shown in North America Chinese (including the writers and scholars). There are a few decades history of Chinese language literature in North America, and because of the limited of space, this paper only select a specific time period and specific author as the analysis objects to explore the meaning of “Loyalist consciousness” and “Post-loyalist consciousness” in North American immigrants in Chinese language Literature and research.
Abstract
As an emerging research method, the proposed of “Sinophone literature” has aroused controversy from the beginning. As advocate of Sinophone literature, Professor. Shu-Mei Shih tries to criticize “Sinocentrism”, “Chineseness” and “Territorialism” by applying the Post-colonialism and Ethnic Minority Literature on the “Sinophone literature”. Professor David Der-wei Wang regarded “Sinophone literature” as a field and a method. The dialogue between Sinophone literature and Chinese literature could communicate with each other through this method and develop a cross-national geographical map of literature in the new era. The “Loyalism” (the immigrant, the loyalist and the foreigner) proposed by Professor David Wang could be identified as three different political identities, and especially the “loyalist” is strongly indicating a political meaning. In this paper, it is proposed that there would be “loyalist consciousness” which derived from Professor David Wang’s “Loyalism”, and become the immigrant consciousness, loyalist consciousness and foreigner consciousness. These three kinds of consciousness are in a trinity with the relationship of immigrants. Nowadays, because of the convenient transportation and economic development, immigrants enter to the post-immigration era, and the “post-loyalist consciousness” is born. This paper tries to elaborate the “Loyalist consciousness” and “Post-loyalist consciousness” with Professor David Wang’s “Loyalism” and how these kinds of consciousness are related to the identity and how they shown in North America Chinese (including the writers and scholars). There are a few decades history of Chinese language literature in North America, and because of the limited of space, this paper only select a specific time period and specific author as the analysis objects to explore the meaning of “Loyalist consciousness” and “Post-loyalist consciousness” in North American immigrants in Chinese language Literature and research.
참고문헌 (36)
- 張翎, "望月" (2015), 浙江文藝出版社
- 張翎, "交錯的彼岸" (2015), 浙江文藝出版社
- 嚴歌苓, "花兒與少年" (2004), 昆侖出版社
- 嚴歌苓, "寄居者" (2011), 陝西師範大學出版總社有限公司
- 嚴歌苓, "小姨多鶴" (2010), 作家出版社
- 嚴歌苓, "扶桑" (2009), 新星出版社
- 嚴歌苓, "金陵十三釵" (2010), 陝西師範大學出版總社有限公司
- 陳涵平, "北美新華文文學" (2006), 寧夏人民出版社
- 黃萬華, "美國華文文學論" (2000), 山東文藝出版社
- 史書美, "蔡建鑫校" (2013), 聯經出版事業股份有限公司
- 史書美, "反離散:華語語系研究論" (2017), 聯經
- 王德威, "後遺民寫作" (2007), 麥田出版社
- 王德威, "華夷風:華語語系文學讀本" (2016), 聯經
- 莊孔韶, "人類學經典導讀" (2008), 中國人民大學出版社
- 고혜림, "포스트식민시대의 디아스포라 문학" (2016), 학고방
- 劉紅英, "嚴歌苓小說論", 博士, pp.2014
- 畢文秀, "嚴歌苓流散寫作研究", 博士, pp.2016
- 劉俊, "“華語語系文學”的生產、發展與批判――以史書美、王德威爲中心", 文藝研究, (11) (2015), 中國藝術研究院
- 金惠俊, "香港文學" (2013), 香港文學出版社
- 王德威, "華夷風起:馬來西亞與華語語系文學", 中山人文學報, (38) (2015), 中山大學
- 王德威, "“根”的政治,“勢”的詩學――華語論述與中國文學", 揚子江評論, (1) (2014), 江蘇省作家協會
- 王德威, "文學地理與國族想象:台灣的魯迅,南洋的張愛玲", 揚子江評論, (3) (2013), 江蘇省作家協會
- 朱崇科, "華語語系的話語建構及其問題", 學術研究, (7) (2010), 廣東省社會科學聯合會
- 필문수, "突破华人华文文学写作的局限: 以华人作家张翎为例", 중국현대문학, (81), pp.205~228 (2017), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 萬沐, "開花結果在彼岸――『北美時報』記者對加拿大華裔女作家張翎的采訪", 世界華文文學論壇 (2005), 江蘇省社會科學院
- 許維賢, "華語語系研究不只是對中國中心主義的批判――史書美訪談錄", 中外文學, 44(1) (2015), 台灣大學外文系
- 趙稀方, "從後殖民理論到華語語系文學", 北方論叢, (2) (2015), 哈爾濱師範大學
- 김혜준, "시노폰 문학(Sinophone literature), 경계의 해체 또는 재획정", 중국현대문학, (80), pp.73~105 (2017), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 김혜준, "화인화문문학(華人華文文學) 연구를 위한 시론", 중국어문논총, (50), pp.77~116 (2011), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
- 김혜준, "시노폰 문학, 세계화문문학, 화인화문문학― 시노폰 문학(Sinophone literature) 주장에 대한 중국 대륙 학계의 긍정과 비판", 중국어문논총, (80), pp.329~357 (2017), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
- 고혜림, "북미 화인화문문학의 역사와 시기구분", 중국학논총, (38), pp.323~339 (2012), 중국학연구소[DOI]
- 傅小平, "張翎:出國對我的寫作來說,破壞性遠大於建設性", 羊城晚報, B2~ (2016)
- 穆肅, "我是一個樂觀的寄居者", 東莞日報(數字報紙), ~ (2009)
- 南航, "十年積累的噴發――張翎訪談錄", 文化交流, ~ (2007)
- 胡德才, "論張翎小說的結構藝術", 多元文化共建的世界華文文學, ~
- "嚴歌苓:‘寄居’在文學深處", 中國新聞網, ~ (2009)
