시노폰 문학, 세계화문문학, 화인화문문학― 시노폰 문학(Sinophone literature) 주장에 대한 중국 대륙 학계의 긍정과 비판
Sinophone Literature, World Chinese Literature, and Overseas Chinese-Language Literature ― Mainland Responses on the Sinophone Literature Discourse
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In mainland China, scholars have been keeping an eye on the development of Sinophone literature discourse, with some expressing more direct interest in it. Many mainland scholars find the notion of Sinophone literature valuable in the way that it can potentially offer fresh academic vantage points, mobilize interdisciplinary methodologies, provide transnational perspectives, develop conversations of the international academic field beyond China, and make theoretical contribution to global literature studies. At the same time, however they often take much more critical stances toward the arguments produced from the Sinophone literature discourse. Most criticism is focused on the way Shu-mei Shih counterposes Sinophone communities(or overseas Chinese) with mainland China. Also, they argue against Shih’s literary interpretations based on ideas like “against diaspora”, “anti-Sino-centrism”, “internal colonialism”, and “settler colonialism”. Mainland scholars identify Shih’s argument as a separatist one that sets the mainland and Taiwan apart, essentially a vestige of Cold War ideology. Moreover, they do not limit their criticism to the argument itself, but extend to conditions of reasoning. They object that it is a case of simple application or misappropriation of postcolonial theory, minor literature theory, and other Western theories to the Chinese and the oversea Chinese problematics. Although these criticisms are justifiable, some of them are rather unnecessarily excessive. Meanwhile, it is rarer to find mainland scholars making exclusively criticism against David Der-Wei Wang’s argument and reasoning. The scarcity can probably be traced from the fact that Wang’s argument has many overlaps with those of the mainland scholars, as well as the way his argument highlights the possibility and the need for productive conversations. However, this does not indicate that there are no criticisms against Wang’s argument. In fact, mainland scholars challenge the way Wang translates the term “Sinophone” to “Huayu Yuxi(華語語系)”. Also, they are wary of the possibility that Wang comprehends the politics between mainland Chinese and the Sinophone community (which includes internally the ethnic minorities and other communities that do not align with PRC nationalism, and externally, the Taiwanese, Hong Kong, Macau, and Overseas Chinese) as domestically a repressive one and externally an imperial project.
Abstract
In mainland China, scholars have been keeping an eye on the development of Sinophone literature discourse, with some expressing more direct interest in it. Many mainland scholars find the notion of Sinophone literature valuable in the way that it can potentially offer fresh academic vantage points, mobilize interdisciplinary methodologies, provide transnational perspectives, develop conversations of the international academic field beyond China, and make theoretical contribution to global literature studies. At the same time, however they often take much more critical stances toward the arguments produced from the Sinophone literature discourse. Most criticism is focused on the way Shu-mei Shih counterposes Sinophone communities(or overseas Chinese) with mainland China. Also, they argue against Shih’s literary interpretations based on ideas like “against diaspora”, “anti-Sino-centrism”, “internal colonialism”, and “settler colonialism”. Mainland scholars identify Shih’s argument as a separatist one that sets the mainland and Taiwan apart, essentially a vestige of Cold War ideology. Moreover, they do not limit their criticism to the argument itself, but extend to conditions of reasoning. They object that it is a case of simple application or misappropriation of postcolonial theory, minor literature theory, and other Western theories to the Chinese and the oversea Chinese problematics. Although these criticisms are justifiable, some of them are rather unnecessarily excessive. Meanwhile, it is rarer to find mainland scholars making exclusively criticism against David Der-Wei Wang’s argument and reasoning. The scarcity can probably be traced from the fact that Wang’s argument has many overlaps with those of the mainland scholars, as well as the way his argument highlights the possibility and the need for productive conversations. However, this does not indicate that there are no criticisms against Wang’s argument. In fact, mainland scholars challenge the way Wang translates the term “Sinophone” to “Huayu Yuxi(華語語系)”. Also, they are wary of the possibility that Wang comprehends the politics between mainland Chinese and the Sinophone community (which includes internally the ethnic minorities and other communities that do not align with PRC nationalism, and externally, the Taiwanese, Hong Kong, Macau, and Overseas Chinese) as domestically a repressive one and externally an imperial project.
참고문헌 (54)
- 박은경, "한국 화교의 종족성" (1986), 한국연구원
- 최승현, "화교의 역사 생존의 역사" (2007), 화약고
- 왕더웨이, "현대 중문소설 작가 22인" (2014), 학고방
- 葛兆光, "宅茲中國 : 重建有關"中國"的歷史論述" (2011), 中華書局
- 王德威, "跨世紀風華 : 當代小說20家" (2002), 麥田出版
- 朱壽桐, "漢語新文學通史" (2010), 廣東人民出版社
- 김혜준, "화인화문문학(華人華文文學) 연구를 위한 시론", 중국어문논총, (50), pp.77~116 (2011), 중국어문연구회
- 김혜준, "시노폰 문학(Sinophone literature), 경계의 해체 또는 재획정", 중국현대문학, (80), pp.73~105 (2017), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 김혜준, "韓國華人華文文學初探", 중국어문논총, (55), pp.323~343 (2012), 중국어문연구회
- 김혜준, "화어계 문학: 주변적 상상과 횡단적 구축", 중국현대문학, (60), pp.255~264 (2012), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 최승현, "현대 “중국”과 “화교”의 상호인식에 관한 연구", 중국학논총, (33), pp.285~306 (2011), 한국중국문화학회
- Shu-mei Shih, "Global Literature and the Technologies of Recognition", PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 119(1) (2004)
- Shu-mei Shih, "Visuality and Identity: Sinophone Articulations across the Pacific" (2007), University of California Press
- Shu-mei Shih, "Hong Kong Literature as Sinophone Literature", Journal of Modern Literature in Chinese, 8;9(2;1) (2008), Centre for Humanities Research at Lingnan University
- Shu-mei Shih, "Theory, Asia, Sinophone", Postcolonial Studies, 13(4) (2010)
- Shu-mei Shih, "The Concept of Sinophone", PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 126(3) (2011)
- Shu-mei Shih, "Chien-hsin Tsai and Brain Bernards, Sinophone Studies: A Critical Reader" (2013), Columbia University Press
- 畢紅霞, "我們爲何批評王德威― 兼論面對“海外漢學”的複雜心態", 當代文壇, (3) (2013), 四川省作家協會
- 陳慧樺, "世界華文文學: 實體還是迷思", 文訊, (52)통권 : 91 (1993), 文訊雜誌社
- 郜元寶, "“重畫”世界華語文學版圖― 評王德威≪當代小說二十家", 文藝爭鳴, (4) (2007), 吉林省文學藝術界聯合會
- 金進, "拓展中國現代文學疆界的必要和可能", 世界華文文學論壇, (3) (2015), 江蘇省社會科學院
- 黃維梁, "學科正名論“華語語系文學”與“漢語新文學”", 福建論壇(人文社會科學版), (1) (2013), 福建社會科學院
- 黃一, "書寫新的文學中國史― 王德威敎授訪談", 山花, (15) (2011), 貴州省文聯;貴州省企業決策硏究
- 李鳳亮, "“華語語系文學”的槪念及其操作― 王德威敎授訪談錄", 花城, (5) (2008), 花城出版社
- 李鳳亮, "二十世紀中國文學硏究的整體觀及其批評實踐― 王德威敎授訪談錄", 文藝硏究, 2009(2) (2009), 中國藝術硏究院
- 李鳳亮, "“華語語系文學”與“世界華文文學”: 一個待解的問題", 文藝理論硏究, (1) (2013), 中國文藝理論學會ㆍ華東師範大學
- 劉俊, "”華語語系文學”的生成, 發展與批判― 以史書美, 王德威爲中心", 文藝硏究, (11) (2015), 中國藝術硏究院
- 彌沙, "世界文學”觀念與華語語系文學", 世界華文文學論壇, (4) (2015), 江蘇省社會科學院
- 彌沙, "中文語境裏的“世界公民” ― 王德威敎授訪談之二", 長城, (7) (2012), 河北省作家協會
- 沈慶利, "和而不同" (2008), 廣西人民出版社
- 史書美, "華語語系硏究芻議, 或, ≪弱勢族群的跨國主義≫翻譯專輯小引", 中外文學, 36(2) (2007), 台灣大學外文系
- 史書美, "理論ㆍ亞洲ㆍ華語語系", 中國現代文學, (22) (2012), 中國現代文學學會
- 史書美, "華語語系硏究對台灣文學的可能意義", 中外文學, 44(1) (2015), 台灣大學外文系
- 史書美, "何謂華語語系硏究?", 文山評論: 文學與文化, 9(2) (2016), 政治大學英文系
- 史書美, "視覺與認同 : 跨太平洋華語語系表述ㆍ呈現" (2013), 聯經出版事業股份有限公司
- 史書美, "反離散: 華語語系作爲文化生産的場域", 華文文學, (6) (2011), 汕頭大學
- 湯擁華, "文學如何“在地” ― 試論史書美“華語語系文學”的理念與實踐", 揚子江評論, (2) (2014), 江蘇省作家協會
- 王德威, "華語語系文學: 邊界想像與越界建構", 中山大學學報(社會科學版), (5) (2006), 中山大學
- 王德威, "文學地理與國族想象: 台灣的魯迅, 南洋的張愛玲", 中國現代文學, (22) (2012), 中國現代文學學會
- 王德威, "“根”的政治, “勢”的詩學― 華語論述與中國文學", 中國現代文學, (24) (2013), 中國現代文學學會
- 王德威, "華語語系的人文視野與新加坡經驗: 十個關鍵詞", 華文文學, (3) (2014), 汕頭大學
- 王德威, "華夷風起: 馬來西亞與華語語系文學", 中山人文學報, (38) (2015), 中山大學
- 王德威, "華語語系, 台灣觀點", 中外文學, 44(1) (2015), 台灣大學外文系
- 溫儒敏, "談談困擾現代文學硏究的幾個問題", 文學評論, (2) (2007), 中國社會科學院文學硏究所
- 溫儒敏, "文學硏究中的“漢學心態”", 文藝爭鳴, (7) (2007), 吉林省文學藝術界聯合會
- 吳奕錡, "華文文學是一種獨立自足的存在", 文藝報 華馨版 (2002)
- 許維賢, "華語語系硏究不只是對中國中心主義的批判: 史書美訪談錄", 中外文學, 44(1) (2015), 台灣大學外文系
- 楊俊蕾, "”中心― 邊緣”雙夢記: 海外華語語系文學硏究中的流散ㆍ離散敘述", 中國比較文學, (4) (2010), 上海外國語大學ㆍ中國比較文學學會
- 曾軍, "“華語語系學術”的生成及其問題", 當代作家評論, (4) (2012), 遼寧省作家協會
- 曾琳, "讀史書美“反離散”原文及中譯文有感", 華文文學, (2) (2014), 汕頭大學
- 趙稀方, "從後殖民理論到華語語系文學", 北方論叢, (2) (2015), 哈爾濱師範大學
- 莊華興, "馬華文學的疆界化與去疆界化: 一個史的描述", 中國現代文學, (22) (2012), 中國現代文學學會
- 朱崇科, "華語語系的話語建構及其問題", 學術硏究, (7) (2010), 廣東省社會科學界聯合會
- 朱崇科, "再論華語語系(文學)話語", 揚子江評論, (1) (2014), 江蘇省作家協會