본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Does Bone Mineral Density Differ between Fan￾Beam and Pencil-Beam?: A Meta-Analysis and Systemic Review

김수진|박성빈|이근영|유준일|고영도|하용찬|윤병호
대한골대사학회 (The Korean Society of Bone Metabolism)|2021.02|대한골대사학회지 (Journal of Bone Metabolism)|제28권 제1호|pp. 67-77

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

OsteoporosisBone densityAbsorptiometryphotonDensitometry
주제분류정형외과학

초록

Background: Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has evolved from pencil-beam (PB) to narrow fan-beam (FB) densitometers. We performed a meta-analysis of the available observational studies to determine how different modes of DXA affect bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. Methods: A total of 1,233 patients (808 women) from 14 cohort studies were included. We evaluated the differences in BMD according to the DXA mode: PB and FB. Additionally, we evaluated the differences in BMD between the 2 types of FB mode: FB (Prodigy) and the most recent FB (iDXA). Pairwise meta-analysis was performed, and weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated for (total lumbar, total hip, and total body). Results: No significant difference was observed in total lumbar (pooled WMD, -0.013; P=0.152) and total hip BMD (pooled WMD, -0.01; P=0.889), between PB and FB. However, total body BMD was significantly lower in the PB compared to the FB group (pooled WMD, -0.014; P=0.024). No significant difference was observed in lumbar BMD (pooled WMD, -0.006; P=0.567), total hip (pooled WMD, -0.002; P=0.821), and total body (pooled WMD, 0.015; P=0.109), between Prodigy and iDXA. Conclusions: The results of this study warrant the recommendation that correction equations should not be used when comparing BMD from different modes. Further research is still needed to highlight the ways in which differences between DXA systems can be minimized.

Abstract

Background: Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has evolved from pencil-beam (PB) to narrow fan-beam (FB) densitometers. We performed a meta-analysis of the available observational studies to determine how different modes of DXA affect bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. Methods: A total of 1,233 patients (808 women) from 14 cohort studies were included. We evaluated the differences in BMD according to the DXA mode: PB and FB. Additionally, we evaluated the differences in BMD between the 2 types of FB mode: FB (Prodigy) and the most recent FB (iDXA). Pairwise meta-analysis was performed, and weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated for (total lumbar, total hip, and total body). Results: No significant difference was observed in total lumbar (pooled WMD, -0.013; P=0.152) and total hip BMD (pooled WMD, -0.01; P=0.889), between PB and FB. However, total body BMD was significantly lower in the PB compared to the FB group (pooled WMD, -0.014; P=0.024). No significant difference was observed in lumbar BMD (pooled WMD, -0.006; P=0.567), total hip (pooled WMD, -0.002; P=0.821), and total body (pooled WMD, 0.015; P=0.109), between Prodigy and iDXA. Conclusions: The results of this study warrant the recommendation that correction equations should not be used when comparing BMD from different modes. Further research is still needed to highlight the ways in which differences between DXA systems can be minimized.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Sanford Baim, "Precision Assessment and Radiation Safety for Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 8(4), pp.371~378 (2005), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  2. Albano D, "Operator-related errors and pitfalls in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry:how to recognize and avoid them", Acad Radiol (2020)[DOI]
  3. Nelson B. Watts, "Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)", Osteoporosis International, 15(11), pp.847~854 (2004), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  4. Mohsen Qutbi, "Technical and patient-related sources of error and artifacts in bone mineral densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: A pictorial review", Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging, 30(03), pp.362~371 (2020), Georg Thieme Verlag KG[DOI]
  5. Szilvia Mészáros, "Comparative Evaluation of Local and International Reference Databases for Forearm Densitometry: Different Impacts on Diagnostic Decisions", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 9(4), pp.445~453 (2006), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  6. Bryon Mueller, "Effects of Radioisotopes on the Accuracy of Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Bone Densitometry", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 5(3), pp.283~287 (2002), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  7. Claus-C. Glüer, "30 years of DXA technology innovations", Bone, 104, pp.7~12 (2017), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  8. Daniel A. Michaeli, "A New X-Ray Based Osteoporosis Screening Tool Provides Accurate and Precise Assessment of Phalanx Bone Mineral Content", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 2(1), pp.23~30 (1999), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  9. Heikki Kröger, "Diagnosis of osteoporosis in clinical practice", Annals of Medicine, 30(3), pp.278~287 (1998), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  10. Harry Denissen, "Alveolar Bone Response to Submerged Bisphosphonate-Complexed Hydroxyapatite Implants", Journal of Periodontology, 71(2), pp.279~286 (2000), Wiley[DOI]
  11. Prins SH, "The role of quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of bone: a review", Clinical Physiology, 18(1), pp.3~17 (1998), Wiley[DOI]
  12. Koizumi K, "Fundamental evaluation of bone densitometry using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)", Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi, 50, pp.123~129 (1990)
  13. 구본산, "Characteristics of Appendicular Tissue Components in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis", 대한골대사학회지, 27(1), pp.35~42 (2020), 대한골대사학회
  14. Laura P.E. Watson, "An Investigation Into the Differences in Bone Density and Body Composition Measurements Between 2 GE Lunar Densitometers and Their Comparison to a 4-Component Model", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 20(4), pp.498~506 (2017), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  15. J. Saarelainen, "Cross-Calibration of GE Healthcare Lunar Prodigy and iDXA Dual-Energy X-Ray Densitometers for Bone Mineral Measurements", Journal of Osteoporosis, 2016, pp.1~11 (2016), Hindawi Limited[DOI]
  16. Shannon A. Morrison, "Comparison of the Lunar Prodigy and iDXA Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometers for Assessing Total and Regional Body Composition", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 19(3), pp.290~297 (2016), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  17. Laura A. Rhodes, "Cross-calibration of a GE iDXA and prodigy for total and regional body bone parameters: the importance of using cross-calibration equations for longitudinal monitoring after a system upgrade", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 17(4), pp.496~504 (2014), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  18. Pawel Pludowski, "The Evaluation of Consistency Between Body Composition Assessments in Pediatric Population Using Pencil Beam and Fan Beam Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometers", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 13(1), pp.84~95 (2010), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  19. Yong Jun Choi, "Cross-Calibration of iDXA and Prodigy on Spine and Femur Scans in Korean Adults", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 12(4), pp.450~455 (2009), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  20. Huffman DM, "Comparison of the lunar DPX-L and prodigy dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers for assessing total and regional body composition", Int J Body Compos Res, 3, pp.25~30 (2005)
  21. Nicola J. Crabtree, "Pediatric in vivo cross-calibration between the GE Lunar Prodigy and DPX-L bone densitometers", Osteoporosis International, 16(12), pp.2157~2167 (2005), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  22. G. M. Blake, "Dual X-ray Absorptiometry: Cross-Calibration of a New Fan-Beam System", Calcified Tissue International, 75(1), pp.7~14 (2004), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  23. B Oldroyd, "Cross-calibration of GE", Lunar pencil and fan-beam dual energy densitometers—bone mineral density and body composition studies, 2003, pp.57(8), 977~987[DOI]
  24. P Tothill, "Comparisons between a pencil beam and two fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue", The British Journal of Radiology, 74(878), pp.166~176 (2001), British Institute of Radiology[DOI]
  25. Adrian G. Ruetsche, "Differences Between Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry Using Pencil Beam and Fan Beam Modes and Their Determinants In Vivo and In Vitro", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 3(2), pp.157~166 (2000), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  26. Kenneth J. Ellis, "Bone Mineral and Body Composition Measurements: Cross-Calibration of Pencil-Beam and Fan-Beam Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometers", Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 13(10), pp.1613~1618 (1998), Wiley[DOI]
  27. Karen Hind, "A Cross-Calibration Study of the GE-Lunar iDXA and Prodigy for the Assessment of Lumbar Spine and Total Hip Bone Parameters via Three Statistical Methods", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 18(1), pp.86~92 (2015), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  28. G. M. Blake, "Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system", Calcified Tissue International, 76(2), pp.113~120 (2005), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  29. Yang DZ, "Manufacture and evaluation of a spine phantom used in the cross-calibration of DXA bone densitometry", Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao, 25, pp.262~266 (2003)
  30. Jean T. Young, "A Simple Method of Computing Hip Axis Length Using Fan-Beam Densitometry and Anthropometric Measurements", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 3(4), pp.325~331 (2000), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  31. R. B. Mazess, "Axial and Total-Body Bone Densitometry Using a Narrow-Angle Fan-Beam", Osteoporosis International, 11(2), pp.158~166 (2000), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  32. A. Lapillonne, "Methods for Measuring Body Composition in Newborns - A Comparative Analysis", Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, 12(2), pp.125~137 (1999), Walter de Gruyter GmbH[DOI]
  33. Byung-Ho Yoon, "Does Teriparatide Improve Fracture Union?: A Systematic Review", 대한골대사학회지, 27(3), pp.167~174 (2020), 대한골대사학회[DOI]
  34. Sarah L Morgan, "Effect of very dense artifacts on Hologic and general electric bone densitometry results", Archives of Osteoporosis, 15(1), pp.77~ (2020), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  35. Diane Krueger, "BMD Measurement and Precision: A Comparison of GE Lunar Prodigy and iDXA Densitometers", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 15(1), pp.21~25 (2012), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  36. G. Haïat, "In vitro speed of sound measurement at intact human femur specimens", Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 31(7), pp.987~996 (2005), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  37. Baltas CS, "Clinical practice guidelines proposed by the Hellenic Foundation of Osteoporosis for the management of osteoporosis based on DXA results", J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact, 5, pp.388~392 (2005)
  38. Karen Hind, "Incidental Findings With Cross Calibration of the GE Prodigy and iDXA Densitometers", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 18(4), pp.561~563 (2015), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  39. Karen Hind, "In vivo Precision of the GE Lunar iDXA Densitometer for the Measurement of Total-Body, Lumbar Spine, and Femoral Bone Mineral Density in Adults", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 13(4), pp.413~417 (2010), Elsevier BV[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Result of Proficiency Test and Comparison of Accuracy Using a European Spine Phantom among the Three Bone Densitometries강현, 김덕윤, 김서화, 김하영, 박기정, 박승환, 박애자, 최지혜, 하용찬대한골대사학회 · 대한골대사학회지2015 · 제22권 제2호Cross-Calibration of Bone Mineral Densities and Body Composition between GE Lunar Prodigy and Osteosys Primus유준일, 하용찬대한골대사학회 · 대한골대사학회지2021 · 제28권 제3호국산 이중에너지 방사선흡수 골밀도 장치와 GE Lunar Prodigy의 교차분석 식 도출에 관한 연구김경아, 김정민, 김정수, 노영훈, 이인자, 이인주(사)한국방사선산업학회 · 방사선산업학회지2017 · 제11권 제1호골밀도 검사의 실제: Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) 중심으로김은희, 김인주, 전윤경대한내과학회 · 대한내과학회지2019 · 제94권 제3호Comparison of the Right and Left Femur Bone Mineral Densities in Postmenopausal WomenChaewon Kim, Hyonjee Yoon, Inhye Shin, Jae-Yen Song, Jung Hyun Park, Jung Yoon Park, Mee-Ran Kim, Minji Ko, Sejin Kim, Yoojin Na, Youn-Jee Chung대한폐경학회 · 대한폐경학회지2023 · 제29권 제3호Measurement Uncertainty in Spine Bone Mineral Density by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry김달식, 김창근, 박애자, 유준일, 채균식, 최지혜대한골대사학회 · 대한골대사학회지2017 · 제24권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

Comparison and Contrast of Bone and Dentin in Genetic Disorder, Morphology and Regeneration: A ReviewWoo Sung Chang, Gayeong Lee, Jaehyun Kim, 박주철, 기시형pp. 1-10Effect of Vitamin K2 Alone or in Combination on Various Bone Turnover Markers Amongst Postmenopausal FemalesLamia AlHajr, Amna Ayoub, Hessa Ahmed, Marwa AlMullapp. 11-26Physical Activity and Bone Health in Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisLena Fleig, Isis Kelly dos Santos, Nicola Y. Edwards, Laura A. Burnett, Rosanne Barnes, Joseph H. Puyat, Joanna E. M. Sale, Heather A. McKay, Lora M Giangregorio, Maureen C. Ashepp. 27-39The Association between Alcohol Consumption and Grip Strength in a Nationwide Survey이가영pp. 41-50Zoledronic Acid after Treatment with Denosumab is Associated with Bone Loss within 1 YearTarun Kadaru, Amal Shibli-Rahhalpp. 51-58
원문 보기