Cross-Calibration of Bone Mineral Densities and Body Composition between GE Lunar Prodigy and Osteosys Primus
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between bone mineral density (BMD) and body composition measured by the Osteosys Primus® and the GE Lunar Prodigy® and to calculate the conversion rate between the 2 devices. Methods: The 40 subjects were men and women in aged 20 to 29 years old. All participants were scanned twice on both the Osteosys Primus (OsteoSys) and the GE Lunar Prodigy (GE Healthcare) DXA systems using the manufacturers’ standard scanning and positioning protocols. Results: Compared to the GE Lunar device, the mean Osteosys fat mass was overestimated to be 12.1% (1,776.9 g) in the whole body, 5.1% (163.9 g) in gynoid, and 6.7% (87.2 g) in android. Compared with the GE Lunar device, the mean BMDs of the Osteosys Primus were underestimated to be 2.3% (0.023 g/cm2) in the whole body and 3.1% (0.035 g/cm2) in L1-4. Compared with the GE Lunar device, the mean lean mass derived by the Osteosys Primus were underestimated to 2.3% (1,045.3 g) in the total body, 3.8% (179.4 g) in arms, and 7.7% (1,104.8 g) in legs, respectively. There were a strong correlation of BMD and body composition between both groups. Conclusions: Linear correction equations were developed to ensure comparability of BMD and muscle mass between the Osteosys Primus and the GE Lunar Prodigy. Importantly, use of equations from previous studies would have increased the discrepancy between the Osteosys Primus and the GE Lunar Prodigy.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between bone mineral density (BMD) and body composition measured by the Osteosys Primus® and the GE Lunar Prodigy® and to calculate the conversion rate between the 2 devices. Methods: The 40 subjects were men and women in aged 20 to 29 years old. All participants were scanned twice on both the Osteosys Primus (OsteoSys) and the GE Lunar Prodigy (GE Healthcare) DXA systems using the manufacturers’ standard scanning and positioning protocols. Results: Compared to the GE Lunar device, the mean Osteosys fat mass was overestimated to be 12.1% (1,776.9 g) in the whole body, 5.1% (163.9 g) in gynoid, and 6.7% (87.2 g) in android. Compared with the GE Lunar device, the mean BMDs of the Osteosys Primus were underestimated to be 2.3% (0.023 g/cm2) in the whole body and 3.1% (0.035 g/cm2) in L1-4. Compared with the GE Lunar device, the mean lean mass derived by the Osteosys Primus were underestimated to 2.3% (1,045.3 g) in the total body, 3.8% (179.4 g) in arms, and 7.7% (1,104.8 g) in legs, respectively. There were a strong correlation of BMD and body composition between both groups. Conclusions: Linear correction equations were developed to ensure comparability of BMD and muscle mass between the Osteosys Primus and the GE Lunar Prodigy. Importantly, use of equations from previous studies would have increased the discrepancy between the Osteosys Primus and the GE Lunar Prodigy.
참고문헌 (18)
- Alina Deniza Ciubean, "Health-related quality of life in Romanian postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and fragility fractures", Clinical Interventions in Aging, 13, pp.2465~2472 (2018), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Tumay Sozen, "An overview and management of osteoporosis", European Journal of Rheumatology, 4(1), pp.46~56 (2017), AVES Publishing Co.[DOI]
- 이영균, "Trend in the Age-Adjusted Incidence of Hip Fractures in South Korea: Systematic Review", Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 9(4), pp.420~423 (2017), 대한정형외과학회
- 윤병호, "Clinical Utility of Biochemical Marker of Bone Turnover: Fracture Risk Prediction and Bone Healing", 대한골대사학회지, 25(2), pp.73~78 (2018), 대한골대사학회[DOI]
- G. Aasen, "Body composition analysis by dual X‐ray absorptiometry:in vivoandin vitrocomparison of three different fan‐beam instruments", Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 66(8), pp.659~666 (2006), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- S Gillette-Guyonnet, "Comparison of bone mineral density and body composition measurements in women obtained from two DXA instruments", Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 124(3), pp.317~321 (2003), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Adam J. Zemski, "Same-Day Vs Consecutive-Day Precision Error of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for Interpreting Body Composition Change in Resistance-Trained Athletes", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 22(1), pp.104~114 (2019), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Cherilyn N. McLester, "Reliability and Agreement of Various InBody Body Composition Analyzers as Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Healthy Men and Women", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 23(3), pp.443~450 (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Hana Choi, "Sarcopenia and Hip-Structure Analysis Variables in Korean Elderly Population", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 23(3), pp.482~489 (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Alex Han, "Diagnostic Criteria and Clinical Outcomes in Sarcopenia Research: A Literature Review", Journal of Clinical Medicine, 7(4), pp.70~ (2018), MDPI AG[DOI]
- M.Ann Laskey, "Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition", Nutrition, 12(1), pp.45~51 (1996), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Brian Oldroyd, "Cross Calibration of the GE Prodigy and iDXA for the Measurement of Total and Regional Body Composition in Adults", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 21(3), pp.383~393 (2018), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Derek Pearson, "Cross Calibration of Hologic QDR2000 and GE Lunar Prodigy for Whole Body Bone Mineral Density and Body Composition Measurements", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 14(3), pp.294~301 (2011), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Landis JR, "The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data", Biometrics, 33, pp.159~174 (1977)
- P. TOTHILL, "Comparisons between Hologic QDR 1000W, QDR 4500A, and Lunar Expert Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Scanners Used for Measuring Total Body Bone and Soft Tissue", Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 904(1), pp.63~71 (2000), Wiley[DOI]
- Holly Hull, "iDXA, Prodigy, and DPXL Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Whole-Body Scans: A Cross-Calibration Study", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 12(1), pp.95~102 (2009), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- 박애자, "Result of Proficiency Test and Comparison of Accuracy Using a European Spine Phantom among the Three Bone Densitometries", 대한골대사학회지, 22(2), pp.45~49 (2015), 대한골대사학회
- Yong Jun Choi, "Cross-Calibration of iDXA and Prodigy on Spine and Femur Scans in Korean Adults", Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 12(4), pp.450~455 (2009), Elsevier BV[DOI]