본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국산 이중에너지 방사선흡수 골밀도 장치와 GE Lunar Prodigy의 교차분석 식 도출에 관한 연구

Cross-Calibration of Domestic Devices and GE Lunar Prodigy Advance Dual-Energy X-Ray Densitometer Devices for Bone Mineral Measurements

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Reliable follow-up of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is essential in clinical practice. When there is a difference in the BMD values from DXA systems in the same patient, cross calibration equation is required for the reliable follow-up. Unfortunately, no equation is existed in BMD measure between GE Lunar Prodigy Advance (US, GE Healthcare; LPA) and Osteosys Dexxum T (Korea, Osteosys; ODT) DXA systems. In this study, we evaluate the agreement of BMD values between LPA and ODT and suggest the cross calibration equation using European spine phantom (ESP) with two systems. We performed BMD measurements using ten scans with ESP in each DXA systems. We compared BMD values and calculated cross calibration equation by linear regression analysis. The comparison between the LPA and ODT bone densitometers used the ESP. Compared to the ESP BMD values, ODT underestimated 14.36% and LPA overestimated 12.96%. The average of total BMD measurement values acquired with ODT were 21.44% lower than those from LPA. Cross-calibration equation for LPA and ODT was derived from ESP. We calculated simple cross calibration equation for LPA and ODT DXA systems. Cross-calibration equation is necessary for the reliable follow-up of BMD values in two different systems.

Abstract

Reliable follow-up of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is essential in clinical practice. When there is a difference in the BMD values from DXA systems in the same patient, cross calibration equation is required for the reliable follow-up. Unfortunately, no equation is existed in BMD measure between GE Lunar Prodigy Advance (US, GE Healthcare; LPA) and Osteosys Dexxum T (Korea, Osteosys; ODT) DXA systems. In this study, we evaluate the agreement of BMD values between LPA and ODT and suggest the cross calibration equation using European spine phantom (ESP) with two systems. We performed BMD measurements using ten scans with ESP in each DXA systems. We compared BMD values and calculated cross calibration equation by linear regression analysis. The comparison between the LPA and ODT bone densitometers used the ESP. Compared to the ESP BMD values, ODT underestimated 14.36% and LPA overestimated 12.96%. The average of total BMD measurement values acquired with ODT were 21.44% lower than those from LPA. Cross-calibration equation for LPA and ODT was derived from ESP. We calculated simple cross calibration equation for LPA and ODT DXA systems. Cross-calibration equation is necessary for the reliable follow-up of BMD values in two different systems.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 정윤석, "골다공증의 최신 치료", 대한류마티스학회지, 19(1), pp.4~10 (2012), 대한류마티스학회
  2. Favus MJ, "Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis", N. Engl. J. Med, 363(21), pp.2027~2035 (2010)
  3. Heymsfield SB, "Dual-photon absorptiometry: Comparison of bone mineral and soft tissue measurements in vivo with established methods", Am. J. Clin. Nutr, 49, pp.1283~1289 (1989)
  4. Hull H, "iDXA, prodigy, and DPXL dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry whole-body scans: a crosscalibration study", JCD, 12(1), pp.95~102 (2009)
  5. Kalender WA, "The European Spine Phantom - a tool for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by DXA and QCT", Eur. J. Radiol, 20(2), pp.83~92 (1995)
  6. Lees B, "Evaluation of the European Spine Phantom in a multi-centre clinical trial", Osteoporosis Int, 7(6), pp.570~574 (1997)
  7. Mazess RB, "Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for total body and regional bone mineral and soft tissue composition", Am. J. Clin. Nutr, 51, pp.1106~1112 (1990)
  8. 오기원, "골다공증", 대한내과학회지, 75(3), pp.267~273 (2008), 대한내과학회
  9. 박예수, "골다공증의 진단과 치료", 대한의사협회지, 55(11), pp.1083~1094 (2012), 대한의사협회
  10. Pierson RN Jr, "Bone mineral and body fat measurements by two absorptiometry systems: Comparisons with neutron activation analysis", Calcif Tissue Int, 56, pp.93~98 (1995)
  11. Rossouw JE, "Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial", JAMA, 288(3), pp.321~333 (2002)
  12. Saarelainen J, "Cross-Calibration of GE Healthcare Lunar Prodigy and iDXA Dual-Energy X-Ray Densitometers for Bone Mineral Measurements", J. Osteoporosis, pp.1~11 (2016)
  13. Shepherd JA, "Cross-calibration and minimum precision standards for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions", JCD, 9(1), pp.31~36 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

GE Lunar Expert와 GE Lunar Prodigy Advance의 골밀도 측정값에 대한 상호 보정(Cross Calibration)김대중, 김혜진, 이관우, 이병주, 정윤석, 최용준대한골다공증학회 · OSTEOPOROSIS2008 · 제6권 제1호Result of Proficiency Test and Comparison of Accuracy Using a European Spine Phantom among the Three Bone Densitometries강현, 김덕윤, 김서화, 김하영, 박기정, 박승환, 박애자, 최지혜, 하용찬대한골대사학회 · 대한골대사학회지2015 · 제22권 제2호골밀도검사의 올바른 질 관리에 따른 임상적용과 해석-이중 에너지 방사선 흡수법을 중심으로-김호성, 동경래, 정운관대한방사선과학회 · Journal of Radiological Science and Technology2008 · 제31권 제1호Cross-Calibration of Bone Mineral Densities and Body Composition between GE Lunar Prodigy and Osteosys Primus유준일, 하용찬대한골대사학회 · 대한골대사학회지2021 · 제28권 제3호이중에너지 X선 흡수계측법(Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry, DXA) 골밀도 장비의방사선 피폭선량 평가 및 진단 참고 준위(DRL) 설정김호성(사)한국방사선산업학회 · 방사선산업학회지2025 · 제19권 제2호이중에너지엑스선흡수기 (Dual energy X-ray Absorptiometry: DXA)를 이용한 골밀도검사 결과분석에서 수동분석법의 유용성 평가곽종길, 김은혜, 김호성(사)한국방사선산업학회 · 방사선산업학회지2018 · 제12권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)