본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공익신고제도의 법적 과제와 전망

Problems and Prospects on Whistleblowing from Law Perspective

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

A Whistleblowing is one of the most effective ways to prevent or eradicate corruption. Provide insider information can play a decisive role for the detection and identification of incidents of corruption is not easy to disclose the structure of corruption within the organization externally, nor hardly noticeable. By activating a Whistleblowing, closed corruption within the organization structure can be converted into an open structure and, in this sense, the Whistleblowing is effective alternative to control corruption within the organization being evaluated. A Whistleblowing is to realize the individual conscience to reject the blind obedience of the organization in modern industrial society that is highly organized and specialized. By external notification the illegal activities of the organization from the perspective of outsiders can not know the internal, A Whistleblowing prevents corruption and improves the organization’s transparency and accountability. In the individual level, it is the expression of fundamental rights, such as in the freedom of expression, freedom of conscience, the right to know. Eventually to pursue the realization of public interest to protect the interests of the community members can contribute to the realization of social justice. And this can make the public reported the activation of reform by securing consensus-based national of the United New. Whistleblowing was enacted for the first time in “The anti-corruption law” of 2001 in Korea. In that law there are various kinds of Whistleblowing procedure and system as following ; dispose of a disadvantage to the complainant complainant’s identity security, personal protection, protection collaborators, arbitrary reduction of punishment, reward and compensation, prohibition of the internal regulations relating to the protection of whistleblower. And the current legal framework of protection for the public interest reporter has been maintained without major changes. Acts relating Whistleblowing in Korea, “The Act on the Anti-Corruption and Installation and Operation of Civil Rights Commission” and “The Protection of Whistleblower Act. The former is mainly in order to prevent corruption in the public sector including whistleblowing. The latter was established in March 2011, defined as the act of infringement of the public interest, such as to violate people’s health and safety, the environment, and the interests of consumers and fair competition, it is the main discipline to govern the conduct of whitleblowing on these acts. The significance of the Protection of Whistleblower Act is the most significant expansion of the private sector to have the target range of blowing. In this study, to verify the legitimacy of the legal and ethical of Whislteblowing, and then I would like to present status and challenges of whistleblowing such as the procedures and systems of whistleblowing, and the protection of the whistleblower in recent laws, and improve the ways.

Abstract

A Whistleblowing is one of the most effective ways to prevent or eradicate corruption. Provide insider information can play a decisive role for the detection and identification of incidents of corruption is not easy to disclose the structure of corruption within the organization externally, nor hardly noticeable. By activating a Whistleblowing, closed corruption within the organization structure can be converted into an open structure and, in this sense, the Whistleblowing is effective alternative to control corruption within the organization being evaluated. A Whistleblowing is to realize the individual conscience to reject the blind obedience of the organization in modern industrial society that is highly organized and specialized. By external notification the illegal activities of the organization from the perspective of outsiders can not know the internal, A Whistleblowing prevents corruption and improves the organization’s transparency and accountability. In the individual level, it is the expression of fundamental rights, such as in the freedom of expression, freedom of conscience, the right to know. Eventually to pursue the realization of public interest to protect the interests of the community members can contribute to the realization of social justice. And this can make the public reported the activation of reform by securing consensus-based national of the United New. Whistleblowing was enacted for the first time in “The anti-corruption law” of 2001 in Korea. In that law there are various kinds of Whistleblowing procedure and system as following ; dispose of a disadvantage to the complainant complainant’s identity security, personal protection, protection collaborators, arbitrary reduction of punishment, reward and compensation, prohibition of the internal regulations relating to the protection of whistleblower. And the current legal framework of protection for the public interest reporter has been maintained without major changes. Acts relating Whistleblowing in Korea, “The Act on the Anti-Corruption and Installation and Operation of Civil Rights Commission” and “The Protection of Whistleblower Act. The former is mainly in order to prevent corruption in the public sector including whistleblowing. The latter was established in March 2011, defined as the act of infringement of the public interest, such as to violate people’s health and safety, the environment, and the interests of consumers and fair competition, it is the main discipline to govern the conduct of whitleblowing on these acts. The significance of the Protection of Whistleblower Act is the most significant expansion of the private sector to have the target range of blowing. In this study, to verify the legitimacy of the legal and ethical of Whislteblowing, and then I would like to present status and challenges of whistleblowing such as the procedures and systems of whistleblowing, and the protection of the whistleblower in recent laws, and improve the ways.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 강경근, "부패방지의 법제적 고찰", 아태공법연구, 11 (2003)
  2. 계희열, "양심의 자유", 고시연구, 24(6) (1997)
  3. 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2008), 법문사
  4. 김승태, "한국의 공익신고자 보호법안 평가", 외법논집, 34(3), pp.195~213 (2010), 법학연구소
  5. 노상헌, "내부고발과 근로자의 법적 보호", 노동법학, (18), pp.157~184 (2004), 한국노동법학회
  6. 공익신고자 보호제도 도입방안 연구, "문영식", 국민권익위원회, ~ (2008)
  7. 박경철, "내부공익제보자 보호제도의 현황과 문제점", 법학연구, 18(3), pp.151~190 (2008), 법학연구원
  8. 박경철, "내부공익정보제공행위 보호의 헌법적 근거와 보호범위", 한국부패학회보, 12(3), pp.85~109 (2007), 한국부패학회
  9. 박경철, "공익신고자보호법의 의의와 문제점", 공법연구, 40(1), pp.163~199 (2011), 한국공법학회
  10. 윤혜진, "내부고발의 윤리적 정당성에 관한 연구", 범한철학, 54(3), pp.337~365 (2009), 범한철학회
  11. 이상수, "신제도주의적 관점에서 본 부패방지법의 한계와 개선방안 연구- 내부고발자보호를 중심으로", 한국부패학회보, 8(1), pp.1~22 (2003), 한국부패학회
  12. 전수일, "내부고발자와 보호문제에 관한 연구", 한국부패학회보, 4 (1999)
  13. 최정학, "내부고발자 보호제도의 법적 문제점", 형사정책, 15(1), pp.9~339 (2003), 한국형사정책학회
  14. DeGeorge, Richard T., "Business Ethics" (1982), Macmillan
  15. Duska, Ronald, "Whistleblowing, In Ethical Issue the Professions" (1989), Uni. of Utah, Prentice-Hall
  16. Ewig, David W., "Freedom Inside the Organization" (1977), E. P. Dutton

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)