내부고발자 보호제도에 관한 연구
The Study on the Protection of Whistleblower
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In 2001, The Korean Whistleblower Protection Act that is called anti-corruption law was enacted, first time and then in 2011, by enaction of protection of accuser for public interest law, Whistleblower(inner accuser) Protection System was established completely in Korea. so, during about 10 years, Although Whistleblower Protection System has been taken root in Korea, it is not enough to protect whistleblowers actually, seeing many cases of whistleblowing, for example, corruption of naval military supply case in 2009, slush fund of Samsung case in 2007,etc. the Whistleblower Protection System is understood the best method to prevention corruption and other crime or illegal activity in organization like as government, corporation and so on, by ordinary watching system that is offered by inner structure itself. but this system has negative side effect like as, weakening of solidarity in organization and members, shock about economic aspect by disclosure of trade secret, etc., falling of social trust or reputation about organization. so, some kinds of precondition are need in successful management of Whistleblower Protection System, so to speak, public condition.; first, there must be significant social harm in relation to whistleblowing case, second, priority of inner disclosure method, third, possibility o f proving t he case by s ound a nd o bjective evidence, forth, reasonable belief of whistleblower about case, fifth, the moral need to disclosure of case. in this study, consulting to above justifying condition of whistleblowing and comparing with the Whistleblower Protection System of other country, problems in Korean Whistleblower Protection System and alternatives will be examined.
Abstract
In 2001, The Korean Whistleblower Protection Act that is called anti-corruption law was enacted, first time and then in 2011, by enaction of protection of accuser for public interest law, Whistleblower(inner accuser) Protection System was established completely in Korea. so, during about 10 years, Although Whistleblower Protection System has been taken root in Korea, it is not enough to protect whistleblowers actually, seeing many cases of whistleblowing, for example, corruption of naval military supply case in 2009, slush fund of Samsung case in 2007,etc. the Whistleblower Protection System is understood the best method to prevention corruption and other crime or illegal activity in organization like as government, corporation and so on, by ordinary watching system that is offered by inner structure itself. but this system has negative side effect like as, weakening of solidarity in organization and members, shock about economic aspect by disclosure of trade secret, etc., falling of social trust or reputation about organization. so, some kinds of precondition are need in successful management of Whistleblower Protection System, so to speak, public condition.; first, there must be significant social harm in relation to whistleblowing case, second, priority of inner disclosure method, third, possibility o f proving t he case by s ound a nd o bjective evidence, forth, reasonable belief of whistleblower about case, fifth, the moral need to disclosure of case. in this study, consulting to above justifying condition of whistleblowing and comparing with the Whistleblower Protection System of other country, problems in Korean Whistleblower Protection System and alternatives will be examined.
참고문헌 (18)
- 김나영, "내부고발제도의 반부패효과", 한국행정학회 하계학술발표논문집 (2010)
- 김승태, "한국의 공익신고자 보호법안 평가", 외법논집, 34(3), pp.195~213 (2010), 법학연구소
- 노상헌, "내부고발과 근로자의 법적 보호", 노동법학, (18), pp.157~184 (2004), 한국노동법학회
- 박경철, "공익신고자보호법의 의의와 문제점", 공법연구, 40(1), pp.163~199 (2011), 한국공법학회
- 범죄신고 증진방안, "이훈규", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1996)
- 장용진, "한국의 내부고발자 사례를 통해 본 효과적인 내부고발의 조건과 함의", 행정논총, 49(4), pp.111~144 (2011), 한국행정연구소
- 조병인, "범죄신고율 제고노력에 관한 고찰", 형사정책연구, 9(2)통권 : 34 (1998), 한국형사정책연구원
- 최정학, "내부고발자 보호제도의 법적 문제점", 형사정책, 15(1), pp.9~339 (2003), 한국형사정책학회
- 범죄분석, "대검찰청", ~ (2011)
- 島村修平, "內部告發者の倫理的ジレンマと「獻身」の槪念 –內部告發者の有效な保護に向ける理論的考察, 應用倫理", 哲學論集, 4 (2009), 東京大学大学院 人文社会系研究科 哲学研究室
- 山崎降志, "內部告發者保護制度をめぐる動き", 調査と情報, (421) (2003), 社會勞動調査室
- Banick, Peter D, "The ‘In-House’ Whistleblower : Walking the Line between ‘Good Cop, Bad Cop’", Wm. Mitchell L. Rev, 37, pp.2011~ (1868)
- Baumer, Eric P, "Reporting Crime to the Police,1973-2005 : a multivariative analysis of long-term trends inthe national crime survey(NCS) and national crimevictimization survey(NCVS)", Criminology, 48(1) (2010)
- Jubb, P. B, "Whistleblowing : a restrictive definition and interpretation", Journal of Business Ethics, 21(1) (1999)
- Tippett, Elizabeth C, "The Promise of Compelled Whistleblowing : what the corporate governance provisions of Sarbanes Oxley mean of employment law", Emp. Rts. & Emp. Pol’y J, 11(1) (2007)
- G20 Anti-Corruption Action Plan, "Action Point 7 : Portection of Whistleblower, Seoul Summit in November", ~ (2010)
- U4 anti-corruption source centre, "Good Practice in Whistleblowing Protection Legislation", ~ (2009)
- Whitaker, L. Pagie, "The Whistleblower Protection Act : An Overview", CRS Report for Congress (2007)
