근대 식민지 경험의 탈각과 변용 : 군산의 사례
Exuviation and Acculturation of Modern Colonial Experience : Case of Gunsan City
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The city of Gunsan is Korea's representative colonial modern city. In the spring of 2013, art exhibition titled <The story of Jangmi-dong> opened in Gunsan and on other area of the city Japanese style houses such as 'Gowoodang' is attracting tourists with the purpose of being the modern history experience space. If so, how are we to understand the two sides of the modern city Gunsan which was constructed and maintained for the Japanese colonization exploitation. Most cities of Korea bear both modernity and coloniality. Colonial exploitation of Japan came in forms of suppression and exploitation on one hand but on the other, it was accompanied by the emergence of modern city and the change of everyday life. Modernity and coloniality have aspect of working as a huge obstacle for the Korean city research. Until now, basic point of view in explaining the Korean modern city was ‘The theory of Colonial Exploitation’ and the process of modernization which progressed during the Japanese occupation was explained as tool development for the exploitation. However, there also exists a point of view that the modernization of Korea during the Japanese occupation was the period in which the hegemonic dominance of Gramsci was activated. Bureaucratic system, education institutions, modern legal system and spatial changes imposed changes in the everyday life. Novel <Arirang> by author Cho, Chong-Rae which portrays the exploitation history of Gunsan and people of colony's sufferings shows in confidence the spatial changes and the changes to the everyday life. These point of views regarding the modernity of the colony brings us important implication for understanding the modern city Gunsan's characteristics as a city and the changes it is currently going through. For the citizens of Gunsan, <The story of Jangmi-dong>is natural and ordinary. On the other hand, 'Gowoodang' shows a colonial experience which reflects the everyday life of which the citizens of Gunsan had to feel, adapt and live in spite of the tragic history. This two sided experience is currently being restructured as a new cultural and historical asset to the city of Gunsan.
Abstract
The city of Gunsan is Korea's representative colonial modern city. In the spring of 2013, art exhibition titled <The story of Jangmi-dong> opened in Gunsan and on other area of the city Japanese style houses such as 'Gowoodang' is attracting tourists with the purpose of being the modern history experience space. If so, how are we to understand the two sides of the modern city Gunsan which was constructed and maintained for the Japanese colonization exploitation. Most cities of Korea bear both modernity and coloniality. Colonial exploitation of Japan came in forms of suppression and exploitation on one hand but on the other, it was accompanied by the emergence of modern city and the change of everyday life. Modernity and coloniality have aspect of working as a huge obstacle for the Korean city research. Until now, basic point of view in explaining the Korean modern city was ‘The theory of Colonial Exploitation’ and the process of modernization which progressed during the Japanese occupation was explained as tool development for the exploitation. However, there also exists a point of view that the modernization of Korea during the Japanese occupation was the period in which the hegemonic dominance of Gramsci was activated. Bureaucratic system, education institutions, modern legal system and spatial changes imposed changes in the everyday life. Novel <Arirang> by author Cho, Chong-Rae which portrays the exploitation history of Gunsan and people of colony's sufferings shows in confidence the spatial changes and the changes to the everyday life. These point of views regarding the modernity of the colony brings us important implication for understanding the modern city Gunsan's characteristics as a city and the changes it is currently going through. For the citizens of Gunsan, <The story of Jangmi-dong>is natural and ordinary. On the other hand, 'Gowoodang' shows a colonial experience which reflects the everyday life of which the citizens of Gunsan had to feel, adapt and live in spite of the tragic history. This two sided experience is currently being restructured as a new cultural and historical asset to the city of Gunsan.
참고문헌 (31)
- 강동진, "근대문화유산을 활용한 창조도시 육성", 국토, 322 (2008), 국토연구원
- 고석규, "근대도시 목포의 역사·공간·문화" (2005), 서울대학교 출판부
- 고은, "두 세기의 달빛, 시인 고은과의 대화" (2012), 한길사
- 공제욱, "식민지의 일상, 지배와 균열" (2006), 문화과학사
- 김경일, "한국의 근대와 근대성" (2003), 백산서당
- 김세용, "근대 역사환경을 통한 도시 정체성의 확립", 도시문제, 42 (2007)
- 김수림, "제국과 유럽: 삶의 장소, 초극의 장소-식민지 말기 공영권·生存圈과 그 배치, 그 기율, 그리고 조선문학", 상허학보, 23, pp.88~114 (2008), 상허학회
- 김승욱, "근대 상하이 도시 공간과 기억의 굴절", 중국근현대사연구, (41), pp.115~140 (2009), 중국근현대사학회
- 김영정, "근대 항구도시 군산의 형성과 변화 –공간, 경제, 문화" (2006), 한울아카데미
- 김영호, "우리나라의 도시형성과정 : 근대도시화의 역사적 기점", 도시문제, 2(8) (1967), 대한지방행정공제회
- 김재희, "1950년대말~60년대 한국영화에 나타난 도시성과 근대성 연구", 대중서사연구, 11 (2004), 대중서사학회
- 나리타 류이치, "근대 도시공간의 문화경험 : 도시공간으로 보는 일본근대사" (2011), 뿌리와이파리
- 방지선, "일제강점하 부산의 지역개발과 도시문화" (2009), 선인
- 서석배, "근대성의 역설" (2009), 후마니타스
- 서용모, "도시 정체성을 통한 도시마케팅 전략 도출 -근대역사물의 활용 사례를 중심으로-", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 10(6), pp.297~306 (2010), 한국콘텐츠학회
- 손장원, "도시정체성의 의미와 가치", 도시문제, 42 (2007)
- 신용하, "식민지 근대화론에 대한 비판적 성찰" (2009), 나남
- 양미숙, "일제강점하 부산의 지역개발과 도시문화" (2009), 선인
- 원도연, "군산근대문화도시 조성사업과 군산시 공간전략", 전북발전연구원·군산시 세미나 발표자료 (2012)
- 윤정숙, "개항장과 근대도시 형성에 관한 역사지리학적 연구: 군산항을 중심으로", 지리학, (32) (1985), 지리학회
- 이송순, "식민지의 일상, 지배와 균열" (2006), 문화과학사
- 자넷 폴, "근대성의 역설" (2009), 후마니타스
- 정명희, "<군산 근대도시 프로젝트의 현황과 발전방안> 발표문", 전북발전연구원, ~ (2011)
- 전라북도 관광객 실태조사, "정명희", 전북발전연구원, ~ (2012)
- 조정래, "아리랑 2", pp.1~13 (2003), 해냄
- 존리, "근대성의 역설" (2009), 후마니타스
- 최강림, "도시정체성과 장소만들기 -"장소만들기"를 통한 도시정체성 확립의 방향-", 도시문제, 42 (2007)
- 하세봉, "근대 박람회에서 개최 도시와 공간의 의미", 한국민족문화, (21), pp.257~291 (2003), 한국민족문화연구소
- Edward Soja, "공간과 비판사회이론" (1997), 시각과 언어
- Lewis Mumford, "역사속의 도시" (1990), 명보문화사
- Mike Savage, "자본주의 도시와 근대성" (1996), 한울
