본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

남북경제협력의 헌법적 기초와 현행 남북경제협력관련법률에 대한 검토

A study upon constitutional basis of economic cooperation between South and North Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

For several decades, “ethnic identity” between the South and the North Korea has played an important role as a stimulant for unification of Korean peninsula. But this cannot be assessed as a major legal ground for the unification. National will(or volition) for the unification can be regarded as the main reason for fulfilling this national duty, and it is transformed into state's actions that concretise all efforts for peaceful unification of Korean peninsula. Economic cooperation between the South and the North is one of these possible efforts, and is justified by means of present constitution article and it's interpretation. The economic cooperation has a close correlation with the unification, and in some cases, carries out affirmative functions for the unification, that government sector has little to involve with. Not only sense of alienation between the North and the South but also disparity in economic power would be reduced in the process of the economic cooperation, and it will draw a significant conclusion of reconciliating those two sides, that stimulates the unification. Therefore, we can emphasise that the economic cooperation makes an epochal contribution to the unification. Constitutional law operates on the economic cooperation as a basis, as principles, and as a boundary of it. It means all the procedures and formalities are strongly restrained within constitutional provisions and fundamental principles of constitution, such as democracy, rule of law, dignity of human being, et cetera. And also, every possible efforts to raise the efficiency of the economic cooperation shall not be un- derestimated. In those principal points of view, “The Act of interchange and cooperation between the South and the North” and its regulations in force contain some clauses that need revision or amendment. On the revision, autonomy of the parties engaged in the economic cooperation as well as effectiveness of the cooperation should be thoroughly reflected. The economic cooperation, as an existent, can be defined as a continuous process of transforming national will into state power within the framework of constitutional principles. Despite some specialties and logics behind politics on Korean peninsula, violation of constitutional values democratic justice and dignity of human being shall not be allowed.

Abstract

For several decades, “ethnic identity” between the South and the North Korea has played an important role as a stimulant for unification of Korean peninsula. But this cannot be assessed as a major legal ground for the unification. National will(or volition) for the unification can be regarded as the main reason for fulfilling this national duty, and it is transformed into state's actions that concretise all efforts for peaceful unification of Korean peninsula. Economic cooperation between the South and the North is one of these possible efforts, and is justified by means of present constitution article and it's interpretation. The economic cooperation has a close correlation with the unification, and in some cases, carries out affirmative functions for the unification, that government sector has little to involve with. Not only sense of alienation between the North and the South but also disparity in economic power would be reduced in the process of the economic cooperation, and it will draw a significant conclusion of reconciliating those two sides, that stimulates the unification. Therefore, we can emphasise that the economic cooperation makes an epochal contribution to the unification. Constitutional law operates on the economic cooperation as a basis, as principles, and as a boundary of it. It means all the procedures and formalities are strongly restrained within constitutional provisions and fundamental principles of constitution, such as democracy, rule of law, dignity of human being, et cetera. And also, every possible efforts to raise the efficiency of the economic cooperation shall not be un- derestimated. In those principal points of view, “The Act of interchange and cooperation between the South and the North” and its regulations in force contain some clauses that need revision or amendment. On the revision, autonomy of the parties engaged in the economic cooperation as well as effectiveness of the cooperation should be thoroughly reflected. The economic cooperation, as an existent, can be defined as a continuous process of transforming national will into state power within the framework of constitutional principles. Despite some specialties and logics behind politics on Korean peninsula, violation of constitutional values democratic justice and dignity of human being shall not be allowed.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 계희열, "헌법학(상)" (2005)
  2. 계희열, "헌법학(중)" (2007)
  3. 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2009)
  4. 김승대, "통일헌법이론" (1996)
  5. 김철수, "독일통일의 정치와 헌법" (2004)
  6. 이준일, "헌법학강의" (2008)
  7. 장영수, "헌법학" (2009)
  8. 장명봉, "분단국가의 통일과 헌법" (2000)
  9. K. Hesse, "통일독일헌법원론" (2001)
  10. 김명기, "통일한국 미래상 대연구1-통일한국의 헌법", 통일한국, (126), pp.24~28 (1994), 평화문제연구소
  11. 김병록, "통일헌법의 국가형태에 관한 연구", 공법연구, 25(4), pp.622~651 (1997), 한국공법학회
  12. 김상겸, "헌법상의 남북관련조항에 관한 연구- 헌법 제3조와 제4조의 헌법해석론 관점에서 -", 헌법학연구, 10(3), pp.221~241 (2004), 한국헌법학회
  13. 김성수, "동서독통일과 경제‧재정질서, in: 독일통일의 법적 조명", pp.215~248 (1994)
  14. 김연태, "개성공업지구에서 개발업자의 법적 지위에 관한 공법적 고찰", 고려대학교 법학과 100주년 기념논문집(고려대학교 법과대학) 제1권, 149~170 (2005)
  15. 김형성, "한반도 통일의 헌법적 과제", 헌법학연구, 4(2), pp.359~383 (1998), 한국헌법학회
  16. 박윤흔, "남북기본합의서의 이행에 따른 남북교류협력법령의 보완‧발전방향", 법학, 34(1), pp.145~35 (1993), 서울대 법학연구소
  17. 박정원, "통일헌법의 이념과 기본질서에 관한 일고", 헌법학연구, 3, pp.615~635 (1997), 한국헌법학회
  18. 송종환, "7·4남북공동성명의 의의와 한계", 북한, (391), pp.55~63 (2004), 북한연구소
  19. 연하청, "한반도 통일비용 산정의 바른 접근", 신아세아, 5(1), pp.177~195 (1998), 신아시아연구소
  20. 이영란, "독일통일과 사회ㆍ문화 갈등", 2004년도 한국사회학회 사회학대회 논문집(한국사회학회),, 747~753 (2004)
  21. 이장희, "남북한의 특수관계와 그 운영방안", 외법논집, 7, pp.141~164 (1999), 한국외국어대 법학연구소
  22. 이장희, "민족화해를 위한 법제도적 정비의 문제", 외법논집, pp.27~47 (2000), 한국외국어대 법학연구소
  23. 이정우, "통일비용은 분단비용보다 훨씬 비싸다", 통일한국, (245), pp.71~73 (2004), 평화문제연구소
  24. 장원태, "국민들의 통일에 대한 지불의사에 관한 설문조사: 우리 국민들의 통일비용 지불의사 얼마까지일까", 통일한국, (161), pp.72~77 (1997), 평화문제연구소
  25. 정경환, "김대중정부 대북정책 평가와 향후 과제", 통일전략, 2(2), pp.79~103 (2002), 한국통일전략학회
  26. 최철영, "대북정책의 변화와 남북교류협력법의 개선방안", 성균관법학, 10(1), pp.439~462 (1999), 성균관대학교 비교법연구소
  27. 홍성국, "남북한 통일비용의 계측", 북한, (229), pp.171~179 (1991), 북한연구소

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)