본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Shakespeare and Writing Myths via J. Dover Wilson and Anthony Burgess

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study argues that the mythical conception of writing remains even after the era of Romanticism, and under the spell of Shakespeare, we envision a writer who is not ordinary and writing which is magic or an extraordinary experience for the chosen few. This article especially looks at the images of Shakespeare by two twentieth-century English literature figures—J. Dover Wilson and Anthony Burgess. We will see where the often quoted but rarely studied description of the Stratford bust as a “self-satisfied pork-butcher” comes from and encounter Burgess’s portrayals of Shakespeare which have received scant critical attention. Wilson in The Essential Shakespeare (1932) wanted the Grafton portrait to be an image of the “Essential Poet.” He summoned an image of a young and beautiful writer who can make his scholarly but adventurous writing acceptable and enjoyable. Burgess’s more modern Shakespeare in “The Muse” (1984), although it depict a monster as the symbol of a canonical writer, certainly shows us writing scenes of seclusion, inspiration, and magic. Both Wilson’s and Burgess’s Shakespeares work to disseminate the myths that writing is something only a few can achieve without knowing how. As a new discovery of the Shakespeare bust has been found in 2021, it is a good time to look back on our own habits and feelings toward images of the great writer.

Abstract

This study argues that the mythical conception of writing remains even after the era of Romanticism, and under the spell of Shakespeare, we envision a writer who is not ordinary and writing which is magic or an extraordinary experience for the chosen few. This article especially looks at the images of Shakespeare by two twentieth-century English literature figures—J. Dover Wilson and Anthony Burgess. We will see where the often quoted but rarely studied description of the Stratford bust as a “self-satisfied pork-butcher” comes from and encounter Burgess’s portrayals of Shakespeare which have received scant critical attention. Wilson in The Essential Shakespeare (1932) wanted the Grafton portrait to be an image of the “Essential Poet.” He summoned an image of a young and beautiful writer who can make his scholarly but adventurous writing acceptable and enjoyable. Burgess’s more modern Shakespeare in “The Muse” (1984), although it depict a monster as the symbol of a canonical writer, certainly shows us writing scenes of seclusion, inspiration, and magic. Both Wilson’s and Burgess’s Shakespeares work to disseminate the myths that writing is something only a few can achieve without knowing how. As a new discovery of the Shakespeare bust has been found in 2021, it is a good time to look back on our own habits and feelings toward images of the great writer.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. Alberge, Dalya, "‘Self-satisfied pork butcher’: Shakespeare Grave Effigy Believed to be Definitive Likeness", The Guardian, ~ (2021)
  2. Biswell, Andrew, "The Real Life of Anthony Burgess" (2005), Picador
  3. Bloom, Harold, "The Western Canon" (1994), Hartcourt Brace
  4. Bowles, William Lisle, "The Poetical Works of William Lisle Bowles. James Nichol, 1855. 46-8 U of Michigan", Google Play Book, ~ (2008)
  5. Brown, Mark, "A New View: Is This the Real Shakespeare?", The Guardian, ~ (2009)
  6. Burgess, Anthony, "Nothing Like the Sun: A Story of Shakespeare’s Love-life" (1996), W. W. Norton
  7. Burgess, Anthony, "The Complete Enderby" (2002), Vintage Books
  8. Burns, John F, "Is This a Shakespeare Which I See Before Me?", The New York Times, ~ (2009)
  9. Drake, Nathaniel, "Shakespeare and His Times: Including the Biography of the Poet", T. Cadell and W. Davies, ~ (2006)
  10. Empson, William, "Falstaffand Mr. Dover Wilson", The Kenyon Review, 15(2), pp.213~262 (1953)
  11. Garber, Marjorie, "Shakespeare’s Ghost Writers: Literature as Uncanny Causality", pp.1~27 (1987), Methuen
  12. Graff, Gerald, "Professing Literature" (1987), U of Chicago Press
  13. Greenblatt, Stephen, "Will in the World", pp.11~14 (2016), W. W. Norton
  14. Lanier, Douglas, "Shakespeare and Modern Popular Culture" (2002), Oxford UP
  15. Matheson, Tom, "The Oxford Companion to Shakespeare", pp.520~521 (2001), Oxford UP
  16. Mathew, Frank James, "An Image of Shakespeare" (1922), Jonathan Cape
  17. Morris, Sylvia, "Shakespeare’s Quill", The Shakespeare Blog, ~ (2012)
  18. Orlin, Lena Cowen, "The Private Life of William Shakespeare" (2021), Oxford UP
  19. Park, Honan, "Shakespeare : A Life" (1998), Oxford UP
  20. Paker, William Riley, "The Norton Book of Composition Studies", pp.3~16 (2009), W. W. Norton & Company
  21. Paul, Richard, "Folger Shakespeare Library" (2021), Episode
  22. Peres, Tessa, "Is This What Shakespeare Really Looked Like?", ~ (2021)
  23. Reedy, Tom, "William Dugdale on Shakespeare and His Monument", Shakespeare Quarterly, 66(2), pp.188~196 (2015)
  24. Shapiro, James, "A Scholarly Analysis of Shakespeare’s Life That Read Like a Detective Story", The New York Times, ~ (2021)
  25. Stinson, John J., "The Manichee World of Anthony Burgess", Renaissance, 26(1), pp.37~47 (1973)
  26. Taylor, Gary, "Reinventing Shakespeare" (1990), Hogarth
  27. Wilson, J. Dover, "The Essential Shakespeare: A Biographical Adventure" (1962), Cambridge UP

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)