원어민과 한국인 학습자 코퍼스에 나타난 등위접속사 ‘and’ 사용의 문법적인 차이
Grammatical Differences in the Use of the English Coordinator ‘and’ Shown in the English Corpus and Korean Learner Corpus
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study was designed to discuss the grammatical differences in the use of the coordinator ‘and’ shown in Korean Learner Corpus of English and Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). For the Korean Learner Corpus data, 117 university students with mid and high beginning levels of English were asked to write an English essay, from which 286 sentences with ‘and’ were collected. For the COCA data, 200 sentences with ‘and’ were randomly selected from COCA. Six types of coordinated constituents—i.e. NP, PP, AP, AdP, VP and S —by Quirk et al. (1985) were used for the syntactic analysis of the two corpora. This study argues that the Korean learners are not fully aware of the grammatical uses of the English coordinator. The Korean learners show the following grammatical characteristics: i) in NP, improper use of articles, repetitive use of omissible words, inappropriate word order, and conjoining heterogeneous constituents; ii) in VP, repetitive use of omissible words, misunderstanding of agreement between subject and its second verb, and use of a few limited adverbs only; and iii) in S, abrupt change of subjects, and repetitive use of omissible subjects and (auxiliary) verbs.
Abstract
This study was designed to discuss the grammatical differences in the use of the coordinator ‘and’ shown in Korean Learner Corpus of English and Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). For the Korean Learner Corpus data, 117 university students with mid and high beginning levels of English were asked to write an English essay, from which 286 sentences with ‘and’ were collected. For the COCA data, 200 sentences with ‘and’ were randomly selected from COCA. Six types of coordinated constituents—i.e. NP, PP, AP, AdP, VP and S —by Quirk et al. (1985) were used for the syntactic analysis of the two corpora. This study argues that the Korean learners are not fully aware of the grammatical uses of the English coordinator. The Korean learners show the following grammatical characteristics: i) in NP, improper use of articles, repetitive use of omissible words, inappropriate word order, and conjoining heterogeneous constituents; ii) in VP, repetitive use of omissible words, misunderstanding of agreement between subject and its second verb, and use of a few limited adverbs only; and iii) in S, abrupt change of subjects, and repetitive use of omissible subjects and (auxiliary) verbs.
참고문헌 (21)
- 류미령, "원어민과 한국인의 등위접속사 and의 사용에 관한 비교분석연구", 언어과학, 24(2), pp.79~99 (2017), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
- 박기성, "영어 AND 접속구문과 한국어 ‘-고", -와’ 접속구문에 대한 비교연구, 2016, pp.24(2), 183~196[DOI]
- 성창섭, "영어 등위접속의 제약", 언어과학, 15(1), pp.71~82 (2008), 한국언어과학회
- De Beaugrande, R, "Introduction to Text Linguistics" (1981), Longman
- Faigley, L., "The Role of Writing Apprehension in Writing Performance and Competence", Journal of Educational Research, 75(1), pp.16~21 (1981)
- Field, Y, "A Comparison of Internal Conjuntive Cohesion in the English Essay Writing of Cantonese Speakers and Native Speakers of English", RELC Jourunal, 23(1), pp.15~28 (1992)
- Givón, T., "English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction, Vol. II" (1993), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Halliday, M. A. K, "Cohesion in English" (1976), Longman
- Hinkel, E, "Matters of Cohesion in L2 Academic Texts", Applied Language Learning, 12, pp.111~132 (2001)
- Hinkel, E., "Second Language Writers’ Text" (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- 김경숙, "Advanced Korean EFL Learners' Use of Connectors in Written Discourse", 외국어교육연구, 22(1), pp.279~296 (2008), 외국어교육연구소[DOI]
- Lorenz, G, "Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse", pp.55~75 (1999), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- McCarthy, M., "Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers" (1991), Cambridge University Press
- Milton, J, "Studies in Lexis", pp.215~246 (1993), Hong Kong University Press
- Narita, M., "Connector Usage in the English Essay Writing of Japanese EFL Learners", LREC, European Language Resources Association, 1171~1174 (2004)
- Quirk, R., "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
- 류미림, "English Connective so in Korean EFL Students’ Writing", 새한영어영문학, 49(1), pp.285~305 (2007), 새한영어영문학회[DOI]
- 류미림, "Constraints in the Use of the Connective and in Korean EFL Students’ Writing", 새한영어영문학, 49(3), pp.163~182 (2007), 새한영어영문학회[DOI]
- Song, J, "Language Proficiency and Conjunctive Cohesion", Discourse and Cognition, 4, pp.217~222 (2014)
- Yang, W., "The Use of Cohesive Devices in Argumentative Writing by Chinese EFL Learners at Different Proficiency Levels", Linguistics and Education, 23, pp.31~48 (2012)
- Zhang, M, "Cohesive Features in the Expository Writing of Undergraduates in Two Chinese Universities", RELC Journal, 32(2), pp.61~93 (2000)