본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

원어민과 한국인의 등위접속사 and의 사용에 관한 비교분석연구

A Comparative Analysis of Coordinator ‘and’ between Korean Learner Corpus and ICE

2

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The purpose of this study is to compare the usage of the coordinator ‘and’ between the International Corpus of English(USA) and a Korean learner corpus of English. For this study, 120 sentences were randomly selected, both from the ICE and the Korean learner corpus that was collected from basic English writing courses in university. The authors analyzed the syntactic and semantic aspects of the coordinator to find out the similarities and differences between native English speakers and Korean learners of English. In this study, we examine the eight types of connotation by Quirk et al.(1985) and the six types of coordinated constituents, viz. NP, PP, AP, AdP, VP and S to find out if Korean learners use it in a proper way. This study argues that they are not fully aware of linguistic principles such as iconicity and grammatical knowledge of English such as post-nominal modifier, nominalization and collocation. Based on the results, it suggests that Korean learners should learn and be exposed to the coordinator in various register

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the usage of the coordinator ‘and’ between the International Corpus of English(USA) and a Korean learner corpus of English. For this study, 120 sentences were randomly selected, both from the ICE and the Korean learner corpus that was collected from basic English writing courses in university. The authors analyzed the syntactic and semantic aspects of the coordinator to find out the similarities and differences between native English speakers and Korean learners of English. In this study, we examine the eight types of connotation by Quirk et al.(1985) and the six types of coordinated constituents, viz. NP, PP, AP, AdP, VP and S to find out if Korean learners use it in a proper way. This study argues that they are not fully aware of linguistic principles such as iconicity and grammatical knowledge of English such as post-nominal modifier, nominalization and collocation. Based on the results, it suggests that Korean learners should learn and be exposed to the coordinator in various register

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 김은일, "사건의 국면에 나타난 영어와 한국어의 부호화 체계 비교", 언어과학, 23(2), pp.21~39 (2016), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
  2. 박기성, "영어 AND 접속구문과 한국어 ‘-고", -와’ 접속구문에 대한 비교연구, 2016, pp.24(2), 183~196[DOI]
  3. 박승윤, "영어의 등위 접속", 담화와 인지, 7(2), pp.187~206 (2000)
  4. 성창섭, "영어 등위접속의 제약", 언어과학, 15(1), pp.71~82 (2008), 한국언어과학회
  5. Altenberg, B, "Learner English on Computer", pp.80~93 (1998), Longman
  6. Davies, M., "A Frequency Dictionary of Contemporary American English: Word Sketches, Collocates, and Thematic Lists" (2010), Routledge
  7. Faigley, L., "The Role of Writing Apprehension in Writing Performance and Competence", Journal of Educational Research, 75(1), pp.16~21 (1981)
  8. Givón. T., "English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction, Vol. II" (1993), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  9. Granger, S, "Connector Usage in the English Essay Writing of Native and Non‐native EFL Speakers of English", World Englishes, 15(1), pp.17~27 (1996)
  10. Halliday, M. A, "Cohesion in English" (1976), Longman
  11. Hinkel, E, "Matters of Cohesion in L2 Academic Texts", Applied Language Learning, 12, pp.111~132 (2001)
  12. Hinkel, E., "Second Language Writers' Text" (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  13. 김경숙, "Advanced Korean EFL Learners' Use of Connectors in Written Discourse", 외국어교육연구, 22(1), pp.279~296 (2008), 외국어교육연구소
  14. Kent Lee, "Korean ESL Learners’ Use of Connectors in English Academic Writing", 영어교육연구, 25(2), pp.81~103 (2013), 팬코리아영어교육학회
  15. Li, T. C, "A Study of Conjunctive Adverbials in Academic Journal", Journal of Science and Technology(Humanity and Sociology), 23(2), pp.145~161 (2014)
  16. Liu, M., "Cohesive Features in Argumentative Writing Produced by Chinese Undergraduates", System, 33, pp.623~636 (2005)
  17. Lorenz. G., "Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse", pp.55~75 (1999), Benjamins Publishing Company
  18. McCarthy, M., "Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers" (1991), Cambridge University Press
  19. Milton, J., "Lexis in Studies", pp.215~246 (1993), Hong Kong University Press
  20. Narita, M., "Connector Usage in the English Essay Writing of Japanese EFL Learners", Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation(LREC 2004), pp.1171~1174 (2004)
  21. Nisbett, R., "The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently and Why" (2003), The Free Press
  22. 오선영, "How to Express Causality: A Comparison of Native and Learner Corpora", 응용언어학, 25(1), pp.321~347 (2009), 한국응용언어학회
  23. 오선영, "Functions of Because in Native English and Korean Learner Corpora", 응용언어학, 25(3), pp.443~470 (2009), 한국응용언어학회
  24. Soo-Kyung Park, "Korean EFL Learner s’ Use of Cohesive Devices in Narrative and Argumentative Essays", Studies in English Education, 18(2), pp.51~81 (2013), 글로벌영어교육학회
  25. Quirk, R., "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
  26. Swales, J., "Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills" (2004), University of Michigan Press
  27. Yang, W., "The Use of Cohesive Devices in Argumentative Writing by Chinese EFL Learners at Different Proficiency Levels", Linguistics and Education, 23, pp.31~48 (2012)
  28. Zhang, M, "Cohesive Features in the Expository Writing of Undergraduates in Two Chinese Universities", RELC Journal, 32(2), pp.61~93 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)