본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국인 청자의 영어단어 재인과 L1-L2 간 어휘경쟁: 발화자의 원어민성 지각을 이용한 실험연구

Korean Listeners’ English Word Recognition and Cross-linguistic Lexical Competition: An Experiment Manipulating Talker Nativeness Information

김성희|김정윤
한국언어과학회 (The Korean Association Of Language Sciences)|2022.02|언어과학 (Journal of Language Sciences)|제29권 제1호|pp. 31-58|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.14384/kals.2022.29.1.031

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

word recognition원어민성어휘 재인언어 간 음운경쟁화자별 적응청자의 경험본보기 이론cross-linguistic phonological competitiontalker adaptationnativenesslistener experienceExemplar Theory
주제분류언어학

초록

A cross-modal word identification experiment was conducted with Korean learners of English to examine the extent to which visual and phonetic cues to the talker’s nativeness contribute to activating phonological competition across English (L2) and Korean (L1) lexicons. Critical trials presented an English lexical target auditorily, along with two visually presented lexical candidates that potentially induced phonological competition with Korean words. In these trials, lexical recognition was significantly delayed when the auditory target contained non-native (i.e., Korean-accented) pronunciation, compared to native pronunciation. The results, taken together with a null effect of visual talker cues (pictures of white vs. Asian faces), are discussed in the context of the Exemplar Theory based on generalized descriptions of listener experience.

Abstract

A cross-modal word identification experiment was conducted with Korean learners of English to examine the extent to which visual and phonetic cues to the talker’s nativeness contribute to activating phonological competition across English (L2) and Korean (L1) lexicons. Critical trials presented an English lexical target auditorily, along with two visually presented lexical candidates that potentially induced phonological competition with Korean words. In these trials, lexical recognition was significantly delayed when the auditory target contained non-native (i.e., Korean-accented) pronunciation, compared to native pronunciation. The results, taken together with a null effect of visual talker cues (pictures of white vs. Asian faces), are discussed in the context of the Exemplar Theory based on generalized descriptions of listener experience.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 김성아, "L2 영어 학습자의 어휘 처리의 신경 인지적 맥락", 영어영문학연구, 58(4), pp.269~288 (2016), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
  2. 김성아, "한국인 영어학습자의 심상 어휘부에 관한 사용기반적 접근 -안구추적과 ERP 기법을 중심으로-", 언어학 연구, (49), pp.123~142 (2018), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
  3. Allopenna, P., "Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models", Journal of Memory and Language, 38, pp.419~439 (1998)[DOI]
  4. Bybee, J, "Phonology and Language Use" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  5. Chomsky, N, "Sound Pattern of English" (1968), Harper & Row
  6. Goldinger, S, "Echoes of Echoes? An Episodic Theory of Lexical Access", Psychological Review, 105(2), pp.251~279 (1998)[DOI]
  7. Harley, T., "The Psychology of Language" (2008), Psychology Press
  8. Hay, J., "From Fush to Feesh: Exemplar Priming in Speech Perception", The Linguistic Review, 23(3), pp.351~379 (2006)[DOI]
  9. Hay, J., "Factors Influencing Speech Perception in the Context of a Merger-in-Progress", Journal of Phonetics, 34(4), pp.458~484 (2006)[DOI]
  10. Hay, J., "Abstract Social Categories Facilitate Access to Socially Skewed Words", PloS ONE, 14(2) (2019)[DOI]
  11. Johnson, K., "Auditory-Visual Integration of Talker Gender in Vowel Perception", Journal of Phonetics, 27, pp.359~384 (1999)[DOI]
  12. Johnson, K, "Talker Variability in Speech Processing", pp.145~165 (1997), Academic Press
  13. Jun, S, "Prosodic Markings of Complex NP Focus, Syntax, and the Pre-", Post-Focus String, 2011, 214~230[DOI]
  14. Kim, J, "Perceptual Associations between Words and Speaker Age", Laboratory Phonology, 7(1) (2016)[DOI]
  15. Kim, J., "Socially-Conditioned Links between Words and Phonetic Realizations", 박사, pp.2018
  16. Kim, J, "Rapid Influence of Word-Talker Associations on Lexical Access", Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(4), pp.775~786 (2018)[DOI]
  17. Kleinschmidt, D, "Robust Speech Perception: Recognize the Familiar, Generalize to the Similar, and Adapt to the Novel", Psychological Review, 122(2), pp.148~203 (2015)[DOI]
  18. Kuznetsova, A., "lmerTest Package:Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models", Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), pp.1~26 (2017)[DOI]
  19. Ladefoged, P, "Information Conveyed by Vowels", The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29(1), pp.98~104 (1957)[DOI]
  20. Liberman, A., "Perception of the Speech Code", Psychological Review, 74(6), pp.431~461 (1967)[DOI]
  21. Luce, P., "Neighborhoods of Words in the Mental Lexicon", 박사, pp.1986
  22. Macnamara, J, "Linguistic Independence of Bilinguals: The Input Switch", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, pp.480~487 (1971)[DOI]
  23. Magnuson, J., "The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Psychology", pp.412~441 (2013), Oxford University Press
  24. Marslen-Wilson, W., "Lexical Representation and Process" (1989), MIT Press
  25. Marslen-Wilson, W, "Accessing Spoken Words: The Importance of Word Onsets", Journal of Experimental Prychology:Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), pp.576~585 (1989)[DOI]
  26. McClelland, J, "The TRACE Model of Speech Perception", Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), pp.1~86 (1986)[DOI]
  27. McGowan, K., "The Role of Socioindexical Expectation in Speech Perception", 박사, pp.2011
  28. Pierrehumbert, J, "Frequency Effects and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure", pp.137~158 (2001), John Benjamins
  29. Pierrehumbert, J, "Laboratory Phonology VII", pp.101~139 (2002), Mouton de Gruyter
  30. Potter, R, "Toward the Specification of Speech", The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22(6), pp.807~820 (1950)[DOI]
  31. Spivey, M, "Cross Talk between Native and Second Languages: Partial Activationof an Irrelevant Lexicon", Psychological Science, 10(3), pp.281~284 (1999)[DOI]
  32. Staum-Casasanto, L., "Does Social Information Influence Sentence Processing?", Paper presented at the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (2008)
  33. Strand, E, "Natural Language Processing and Speech Technology", pp.14~26 (1996), Mouton de Gruyter
  34. Szakay, A., "Social Categories are Shared across Bilinguals’ Lexicons", Journal of Phonetics, 59, pp.92~109 (2016)[DOI]
  35. Tesink, C., "Unification of Speaker and Meaning in Language Comprehension: An fMRI Study", Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(11), pp.2085~2099 (2009)[DOI]
  36. van Berkum, J, D, "The Neural Integration of Speaker and Message", Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(4), pp.580~591 (2008)[DOI]
  37. Walker, A, "Congruence between ‘Word Age’ and ‘Voice Age’ Facilitates Lexical Access", Laboratory Phonology, 2(1), pp.219~237 (2011)[DOI]
  38. Zhang, Y, "Acoustic Cue-Weighting Strategies for English Vowel Tenseness and Experience-based Talker Adaptation", 박사

관련 논문AI추천

불일치 음성 정보가 영어 L2 학습자의 어휘 인지에 미치는 연구: 시간적 처리 양상을 중심으로김성아대한영어영문학회 · 영어영문학연구2020 · 제62권 제4호영어 비모국어 화자의 외국인 액센트 지각에 미치는 어휘 효과: 언어 숙달도와의 상호작용을 중심으로김성아대한영어영문학회 · 영어영문학연구2010 · 제52권 제3호어휘접근 과정에서 나타나는 한국인 L2 학습자의 이중언어 음운적 동시활성화 양상남기춘, 백연지언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2020 · 제95호외국인 액센트 지각에 미치는 어휘 빈도수 효과김성아한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2010 · 제26권 제2호English Native and Nonnative Speakers’ Perception of English Reduced Word Forms with Reduced VowelsGwanhi Yun아시아테플 · Journal of Asia TEFL2020 · 제17권 제1호한국어의 종성중화 작용이 영어 단어 인지에 미치는 영향김선미, 남기춘한국음성학회 · 말소리와 음성과학2010 · 제2권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)

한국과 중국 속담 속 ‘쓰다(苦)’ 의미에 관한 고찰강은지pp. 1-29원어민과 한국인 학습자 코퍼스에 나타난 등위접속사 ‘and’ 사용의 문법적인 차이류미령pp. 59-78거꾸로 수업이 고등학생 영어 읽기 능력에 미치는 영향박명호, 김정렬pp. 79-96영어 기초 읽기능력 자가진단프로그램 개발 기초연구우길주pp. 97-116통번역 전공생을 위한 외국어로서의 한국어 교육 연구: <한국어 숙달> 교과의 설계 및 운영 사례를 중심으로윤창숙pp. 117-137
원문 보기