본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

고등학교 영어교과서에 사용된 등위접속사 ‘and’의 문법적 및 의미적 분석: 응집장치로서의 기능을 중심으로

A comparative analysis of the coordinator ‘and’ used in Korean high school English textbooks

류미령
팬코리아영어교육학회 (Pan-Korea English Teachers Association)|2020.12|영어교육연구 (English Language Teaching)|제32권 제4호|pp. 165-182|DOI 10.17936/pkelt.2020.32.4.009

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

textbookcoordinatorcohesionCOCAand응집(cohesion)등위접속(coordinator)연결어(connector)교과서(textbook)접속사(and)connector
주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study compares the usage of the coordinator ‘and’ as a cohesive device between the Corpus of Contemporary American (COCA) and Korean High School English Textbooks. For this study, 200 sentences were randomly selected from COCA in academic writing and the three most widely used textbooks from English II. The target features are the six types of coordinated constituents and the eight types of connotation classified by Quirk et al. (1985). The results show that the three textbooks do not reflect the usage of native speakers’ speech enough both in the grammatical and semantic aspects. The results also include that a certain textbook is worse than the others because it only deals with the low percentage of the usage found in COCA. The findings of this study suggest pedagogical implications which could help to deal with the usage of authentic and various register in English textbook. (141 words)

Abstract

This study compares the usage of the coordinator ‘and’ as a cohesive device between the Corpus of Contemporary American (COCA) and Korean High School English Textbooks. For this study, 200 sentences were randomly selected from COCA in academic writing and the three most widely used textbooks from English II. The target features are the six types of coordinated constituents and the eight types of connotation classified by Quirk et al. (1985). The results show that the three textbooks do not reflect the usage of native speakers’ speech enough both in the grammatical and semantic aspects. The results also include that a certain textbook is worse than the others because it only deals with the low percentage of the usage found in COCA. The findings of this study suggest pedagogical implications which could help to deal with the usage of authentic and various register in English textbook. (141 words)

참고문헌 (31)

  1. 고광윤, "중학교 영어 교과서의 어휘적 연계성에 대한 코퍼스 바탕 연구", 영어학연구, (24), pp.27~45 (2007), 한국영어학학회[DOI]
  2. 교육부, "2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 교과용 도서 개발을 위한 편찬상의 유의점및 검정기준", 교육부, ~ (2016)
  3. 김진완, "English II" (2009), 천재교육
  4. 김향숙, "영어 교과서에서 대조 연결사 ‘however’와 ‘but’에 대한 코퍼스 기반 분석", 영어어문교육, 23(2), pp.17~36 (2017), 한국영어어문교육학회
  5. 류미령, "원어민과 한국인의 등위접속사 and의 사용에 관한 비교분석연구", 언어과학, 24(2), pp.79~99 (2017), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
  6. 민수정, "고등학교 영어 교과서에 사용된 기본 어휘에 대한 코퍼스 기반 분석", 영어영문학, 17(1), pp.143~159 (2012), 미래영어영문학회[DOI]
  7. 신정현, "English II" (2009), YBM
  8. 안수진, "한국인 영어 학습자들의 구어 및 문어담화에 나타난 응집장치 사용 양상", 새한영어영문학, 59(2), pp.163~186 (2017), 새한영어영문학회[DOI]
  9. 박소연, "코퍼스를 활용한 영어 어휘 학습의 효과 연구", 영어영문학연구, 51(3), pp.145~165 (2009), 한국중앙영어영문학회[DOI]
  10. 이지혜, "고등학교 영어교과서 분석을 통한 전치사 on의 용례 고찰", 영어영문학, 18(1), pp.155~176 (2013), 미래영어영문학회
  11. 이찬승, "English II" (2009), 능률
  12. 이화자, "영어 독해에서의 cohesion이 중학생의 영어독해에 미치는 영향", 영어교육, 37, pp.73~93 (1989)
  13. 주형미, "국가 영어과 교육과정 기본 어휘 목록 개선 연구", 영어학연구, 17(1), pp.57~81 (2011), 한국영어학학회[DOI]
  14. 최민주, "수능 영어 문항 유형간 응집력과 어휘정보 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 17(12), pp.378~385 (2017), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  15. 함미영, "영어 텍스트 수정이 텍스트 난이도와 응집성에 미치는 영향", 영어어문교육, 19(2), pp.335~355 (2013), 한국영어어문교육학회
  16. 황이수, "수학능력시험 영어 읽기 지문의 응집성과 문항 난이도 간의 상관관계 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 20(5), pp.344~350 (2020), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  17. Crewe, W. J., "The illogic of logical connections", ELT Journal, 44(4), pp.316~325 (1990)
  18. Davies, M., "A frequency dictionary of contemporary American English:Word sketches, collocates, and thematic lists" (2010), Routledge
  19. Field, Y., "A comparison of internal conjunctive cohesion in English essay writing of Cantonese speakers and native speakers of English", RELC Journal, 23, pp.15~28 (1992)
  20. Field, Y., "A comparison of internal conjunctive cohesion in the English essay writing of Cantonese speakers and native speakers of English", RELC Journal, 23(1), pp.15~28 (1992)
  21. Granger, S., "Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and nonnative EFL speakers of English", World Englishes, 15(1), pp.17~27 (1996)
  22. Graves, K., "Designing language courses: A guide for teachers" (2000), Heinle & Heinle
  23. Halliday, M. A., "Cohesion in English" (1976), Longman
  24. 고현숙, "Overuse of the Discourse Filler, “So” in Micro-teaching Talks by Koreans", 어학연구, 49(1), pp.25~44 (2013), 언어교육원
  25. 김경숙, "Advanced Korean EFL Learners' Use of Connectors in Written Discourse", 외국어교육연구, 22(1), pp.279~296 (2008), 외국어교육연구소[DOI]
  26. Li, T. C., "A study of Conjunctive Adverbials in Academic Journal", Journal of Science and Technology(Humanity and Sociology), 23(2), pp.145~161 (2014)
  27. Lorenz, G., "Coherence in spoken and written discourse", pp.55~75 (1999), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  28. Ryoo M. L., "Constraints in the use of the connective and in Korean EFL Students’Writing", The New Korean Journal of English Language & Literature, 49(3), pp.163~182 (2007)
  29. Quirk, R., "A comprehensive grammar of the English language" (1985), Longman
  30. Rivers, W. M., "Teaching foreign language skills" (1981), University of Chicago
  31. 김성애, "An Analysis of Korean EFL Writers’ Errors in the Use of Cohesive Devices", 현대영어교육, 18(4), pp.1~23 (2017), 현대영어교육학회[DOI]

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)

Textual Features in EFL Writing: Comparing Two Differing Levels of Writing Proficiency조영교pp. 1-26Interactional Effects of Feedback Type and Target Structure on Accuracy in L2 Writing장성수pp. 27-42Two Types of Error Source in Performance by Korean Advanced English Learners: Conceptual Mismatch and Complex-rule Drivenness김지희, 이예식pp. 43-66Effects of Topic and Source Text on the Lexical Proficiency and Syntactic Complexity of High School Students’ Writing김성애pp. 67-88Chinese ESL Writers’ Use of English Contrastive MarkersLee Kentonpp. 89-110
원문 보기