본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Conventional-Nuclear Integration (CNI) as Alliance Practice for Extended Deterrence and Assurance

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Since the April 2023 Washington Declaration and establishment of the Nuclear Consul-tative Group(NCG), the essence of efforts to enhance ROK-US extended deterrence has focused on improving ‘conventional-nuclear integration(CNI)’ of US and ROK forces, including US’s nuclear weapons. Yet, as this study finds, there is an intriguing dearth of both theoretic and practical discussions on the concept of CNI. In this backdrop, main purpose of this paper is to delve into the concept of CNI and how it fits within the overall extended deterrence discourse. In brief, this article defines CNI as US’s means for deter-rence and assurance. This article particularly reflects on NATO’s 1960s when CNI ar-rangements were first made into the current nuclear sharing mechanism. Then, this paper delves into the evolution of US’s extended deterrence policy to ROK under the concept of CNI, leading to policy implications for the implementation of NCG.

Abstract

Since the April 2023 Washington Declaration and establishment of the Nuclear Consul-tative Group(NCG), the essence of efforts to enhance ROK-US extended deterrence has focused on improving ‘conventional-nuclear integration(CNI)’ of US and ROK forces, including US’s nuclear weapons. Yet, as this study finds, there is an intriguing dearth of both theoretic and practical discussions on the concept of CNI. In this backdrop, main purpose of this paper is to delve into the concept of CNI and how it fits within the overall extended deterrence discourse. In brief, this article defines CNI as US’s means for deter-rence and assurance. This article particularly reflects on NATO’s 1960s when CNI ar-rangements were first made into the current nuclear sharing mechanism. Then, this paper delves into the evolution of US’s extended deterrence policy to ROK under the concept of CNI, leading to policy implications for the implementation of NCG.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. Cheong, S. C, "Rebuttal to the Opponents Logic against Korea’s Independent Nuclear Armament", Liberty Korea Post, ~ (2022)
  2. US’s Low-yield Nuclear Weapons and Implications for ROK-US Extended Deterrence, "Jo, B. Y.", KIDA, ~ (2021)
  3. UK and Germany’s ‘Nuclear Sharing’ Model and Implica-tions for ROK-US Extended Deterrence, "Jo, B. Y.", KIDA, ~ (2022)
  4. The Building of NATO Nuclear Planning Group (NPG) in the 1960s and Implications for ROK-US Extended Deterrence, "Jo, B. Y", KIDA, ~ (2023)
  5. KRINS, "2022 National Security Strategies and Tasks Proposal to the New Government. National Security Strategy Seminar, Seoul", National Security Strategy Seminar (2021)
  6. Ryu, J. S., "The ROK-US Nuclear Sharing System Is A Must, Not a Choice", Hankyung, ~ (2019)
  7. Yoo, Y. W., "Create an Asian Nuclear Sharing Group: Solutions to North Korea’s Nuclear Problem by Former Ministers in Asia and Europe", Weekly Chosun, ~ (2021)
  8. Acton, J, "Escalation through Entanglement: How the Vulnerability of Command-and-Control Systems Raises the Risks of an Inadvert-ent Nuclear War", International Security, 43(1), pp.56~99 (2018)
  9. Anderson, J., "Deterring, Countering, and Defeating Conventional-Nuclear Integration", Strategic Studies Quarterly, 15(1), pp.28~60 (2021)
  10. Bush, G. H. W., "Address to the Nation on Reducing United States and Soviet Nuclear Weapons", ~ (1991)
  11. Charles, D, "Nuclear Planning in NATO" (1987), Ballinger Publishing Co
  12. Howard, M, "Reassurance and Deterrence: Western Defense in the 1980s", Foreign Affairs, 61(2), pp.309~324 (1982)
  13. Jo, B. Y, "Across Seoul and Washington: The Multilevel Politics of the US–South Korea Partnership" (2023), GW Institute for Korean Studies
  14. Jones, "Able Archer 83: The Secret History of the NATO Exercise That Almost Triggered Nuclear War" (2016), The New Press
  15. Kristensen, H. M, "A History of US Nuclear Weapons in South Ko-rea", Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 73(6), pp.349~357 (2017)
  16. Legge, M., "Theater Nuclear Weapons and the NATO Strategy of Flexible Response" (1983), Rand Corporation
  17. Leitenberg, M., "Tac-tical Nuclear Weapons: European Perspectives" (1978), Taylor & Francis
  18. List, N. J., "Conventional Nuclear Integration: Reinforcing Strategic Stability", pp.2020
  19. Lyon, R, "The Challenges Confronting US Extended Deterrence in Asia", International Affairs, 89(4), pp.929~941 (2013)
  20. Manzo, V. A., "The Logic of Integrating Conven-tional and Nuclear Planning" (2016), Arms Control Association
  21. Mazarr, M. J, "Understanding Deterrence" (2018), RAND Corporation
  22. Melissen, J., "Nuclearizing NATO, 1957-1959: The ‘Anglo-Saxons’, Nuclear Sharing and the Fourth Country Problem", Review of Inter-national Studies, 20(3), pp.253~275 (1994)
  23. NATO, "Nuclear Planning Group (NPG)", ~ (2022)
  24. Payne, K. B, "On Nuclear Deterrence and Assurance", Strategic Stud-ies Quarterly, 3(1), pp.43~80 (2009)
  25. ROK Office of the President, "U.S.-ROK Joint Press Release on Nuclear Consultative Group", ~ (2023)
  26. Sayle, T., "A Nuclear Education: The Origins of NATO’s Nuclear Planning Group", Journal of Strategic Studies, 43(6-7), pp.920~956 (2020)
  27. Schelling, T., "Arms and Influence" (2008), Yale University Press
  28. Schmidt, H., "Defense or Retaliation: A German View" (1962), Praeger
  29. Snyder, G. H., "Deterrence and Defense: Toward a Theory of Nation-al Security" (1961), Princeton University Press
  30. Talmadge, C, "Would China Go Nuclear?: Assessing the Risk of Chinese Nuclear Escalation in a Conventional War with the United States", International Security, 41(4), pp.50~92 (2017)
  31. Taylor, M. D., "The Uncertain Trumpet" (1960), Harper & Brothers
  32. The White House, "Washington Declaration", ~ (2023)
  33. The White House, "Joint Press Statement on Nuclear Consultative Group Meeting", ~ (2023)
  34. Trachtenberg, D. J., "US Extended Deterrence: How Much Strategic Force Is Too Little?", Strategic Studies Quarterly, 6(2), pp.62~92 (2012)
  35. US DoD, "55th Security Consultative Meeting Joint Communique", ~ (2023)
  36. 2022 Nuclear Posture Review, "US DoD", ~ (2022)
  37. 2022 Nuclear Defense Strategy, "US DoD", ~ (2022)
  38. 2018 Nuclear Posture Review, "US DoD", ~ (2018)
  39. US DoD, "The 7th Korea-U.S. Integrated Defense Dialogue (KIDD)", ~ (2015)
  40. US DoD, "The 41st Security Consultative Meeting Joint Communiqué", ~ (2009)
  41. US DoD, "The 38th Security Consultative Meeting Joint Communiqué", ~ (2006)
  42. USFK, "U.S., South Korea Announce ‘Tailored Deter-rence’ Strategy", ~ (2013)
  43. Wittefried, P. F., "A Strategy of Flexible Response", Parameters, 2(1), pp.2~16 (1972)
  44. Yonhap News, "Washington Declaration Goes beyond ‘Nu-clear-Sharing’: U.S. Official", ~ (2023)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)