본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

댄스스포츠의 올림픽 정식종목화를 위한 과제: 판정 및 채점시스템을 중심으로

Challenges of Dance Sport for the Olympic Official Games: Focusing on Judging and Marking System

정진오
한국리듬운동학회 (Korean Society for Rhythmic Exercises)|2022.04|한국리듬운동학회지 (Journal of Korean Society for Rhythmic Exercises)|제15권 제1호|pp. 11-31|DOI 10.34270/jksre.2022.15.1.11

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

dancesportOlympic official gamesobjective criteriajudging systemmarking system
주제분류체육

초록

In the era when there were no criteria in international DanceSport competitions, only the marking system guaranteed fairness of results. For 100 years from 1907 to 2007, the adjudicator’s preference have served as tools to determine performance. Even if the adjudicator’s judgment problem was in the criteria, it could not be improved. In 2008, when WDSF developed a ‘new IDSF judging system(NJS1.0)’ and applied it to the field, it entered the era of the criteria. As for the objective criteria, Judging Components, Performance Assessment Standards, Indicative Qualities and Scoring Systems can play a role as a judgement tool. WDSF has dramatically improved the judgment system to JS2.0, JS2.1 and AJS3.0 through constant communication with athletes, coach and adjudicators. However, Korean athletes, coach and adjudicators are still applying the past traditional Skating System to the field without knowing the changes and innovations in the WDSF’s judging system. Adjudicators should find judgment problems, but athletes and coach should also know the international judging and marking system to solve the judgment problems. This knowledge will be used as information to solve the problem of judgment in the field and will contribute to solving the challenges of DanceSport for the Olympic official games.

Abstract

In the era when there were no criteria in international DanceSport competitions, only the marking system guaranteed fairness of results. For 100 years from 1907 to 2007, the adjudicator’s preference have served as tools to determine performance. Even if the adjudicator’s judgment problem was in the criteria, it could not be improved. In 2008, when WDSF developed a ‘new IDSF judging system(NJS1.0)’ and applied it to the field, it entered the era of the criteria. As for the objective criteria, Judging Components, Performance Assessment Standards, Indicative Qualities and Scoring Systems can play a role as a judgement tool. WDSF has dramatically improved the judgment system to JS2.0, JS2.1 and AJS3.0 through constant communication with athletes, coach and adjudicators. However, Korean athletes, coach and adjudicators are still applying the past traditional Skating System to the field without knowing the changes and innovations in the WDSF’s judging system. Adjudicators should find judgment problems, but athletes and coach should also know the international judging and marking system to solve the judgment problems. This knowledge will be used as information to solve the problem of judgment in the field and will contribute to solving the challenges of DanceSport for the Olympic official games.

참고문헌 (66)

  1. 김동규, "투쟁 스포츠 심판의 자질 및 심판풍토에 관한 조사연구", 인문연구, 10(2), pp.281~321 (1989)
  2. 김미선, "댄스스포츠 라틴종목 심사위원의 수준에 따른 일치도 분석", 한국체육학회지, 60(5), pp.419~426 (2021), 한국체육학회[DOI]
  3. 김미선, "시각탐색을 통한 댄스스포츠 심판시스템 분석", 박사, pp.2018
  4. 김미숙, "Trust in Dancesport Competition Judges and Moral Philosophy of Kant", 움직임의 철학 : 한국체육철학회지, 26(3), pp.111~120 (2018), 한국체육철학회[DOI]
  5. 김성아, "댄스스포츠 연기력 평정척도의 타당도", 박사, 체육학, pp.2009
  6. 김은숙, "댄스스포츠경기의 새로운 판정시스템 개발을 위한 심판판정의 집중력과 판정선호도 및 주의력의 관계", 한국체육과학회지, 23(6), pp.493~509 (2014), 한국체육과학회
  7. 김응준, "혼합연구방법을 이용한 댄스스포츠경기의 예비심사평정척도 개발", 한국체육측정평가학회지, 10(1), pp.13~29 (2008), 한국체육측정평가학회[DOI]
  8. 김응준, "국제 댄스스포츠 심사위원의 평가적합성과 선수 경기력의 관계", 한국사회체육학회지, (29), pp.727~738 (2007), 한국사회체육학회
  9. 김응준, "댄스스포츠 경기대회의 심사판정자 객관도", 한국체육학회지, 45(3), pp.469~480 (2006), 한국체육학회
  10. 김지은, "댄스스포츠 선수의 순위결정 - Rasch 모형의 적용 -", 한국무용연구, 36(4), pp.45~67 (2018), 한국무용연구학회[DOI]
  11. 김형돈, "국내 댄스 스포츠 경기 대회의 국내·외 심사자 판정 적합도 검정", 한국체육과학회지, 21(3), pp.1319~1329 (2012), 한국체육과학회[DOI]
  12. 박도순, "측정⋅평가21 척도법" (2006), 교육과학사
  13. 이승훈, "댄스스포츠 라틴 종목 심사 특성에 따른 일치도 분석", 체육과학연구, 31(4), pp.830~839 (2020), 국민체육진흥공단 한국스포츠정책과학원[DOI]
  14. 이영란, "댄스스포츠 심판의 스트레스원인 탐색", 한국리듬운동학회지, 4(1), pp.29~53 (2011)
  15. 이충훈, "댄스스포츠 경기에서 심사위원의 심사기준에 대한 분석", 한국 스포츠 리서치, 17(5), pp.253~264 (2006), 한국스포츠리서치
  16. 이한우, "내ㆍ외적 주의초점 피드포워드와 피드백의 조합에 따른 골프퍼팅과제의 수행 및 학습효과", 한국스포츠학회, 9(3), pp.99~110 (2011), 한국스포츠학회
  17. "‘심판원’은 경기장에서 경쟁하는 사람의 경기력을 ‘판정’한다" (2022)[URL]
  18. "‘청소년 스탠다드 및 라틴아메리칸 선수’는 모두 어디로 갔을까?" (2018)[URL]
  19. 정진오, "댄스스포츠경기의 판정순위 손실에 따른 채점방식의 제고", 한국사회체육학회지, (32), pp.1313~1324 (2008), 한국사회체육학회
  20. 정진오, "댄스스포츠 경기방식에 대한 이해", 한국댄스스포츠학회지, 2, pp.1~13 (2007), 한국리듬운동학회
  21. 정진오, "댄스스포츠 경기대회의 심판구성 및 판정에 대한 연구", 한국사회체육학회지, (26), pp.483~495 (2006), 한국사회체육학회
  22. 조미호, "댄스스포츠 심판의 판정전문화에 대한 질적분석(1): 심판전문화의 경험적과정", 한국리듬운동학회지, 4(2), pp.41~63 (2011)
  23. 조영달, "제도공간의 질적연구 방법론" (2005), 교육과학사
  24. 최병일, "댄스스포츠의 채점방식에 관한 비교연구: 합산식 시스템과 스케이팅 시스템을 중심으로", 석사, 체육학교육, pp.2003
  25. Adrian, N, "A Computerized System For Judging Dancesport Competitions-An Innovative Application", The 13th International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education (2017)
  26. Ambrož, N, "International DanceSport Federation New Judging System", World Dancesport Mag, 4, pp.36~40 (2010)
  27. "Members"[URL]
  28. Boland, P. J., "M ajority Sy s tems a nd T he Condorcet Jury Theorem", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D The Statistician, 38, pp.181~189 (1989)
  29. Casey, W., "Firsts: Origins of Everyday Things That Changed the World" (2009), Turnaround
  30. Carlsen, J., "The dancesport scrutineer’s rulebook and observer’s guide to competition marks" (1996), Dancing Bear Publishing Company
  31. Dawson. A., "Working out the marks in ballroom dancing championships" (1963), Official Board of Ballroom Dancing
  32. "WDSF Rules and Regulations Manual Breaking(Version 1)" (2019)[URL]
  33. Hiller, S, "Judging", Dance News, ~ (2000)
  34. IOC, "Olympic Charter", Maison Olympique CP 356 1007 Lausanne Switzerland, ~ (2021)
  35. Keck, M. L. B., "An Analysis of the current Judging Methods used in Competitive Ballroom Dancing Including Comparisons to Competitive Pairs Figure skating and Ice Dancing", master, pp.1998
  36. Mayer-Karakis, B., "Ballroom Icons" (2009), Dancesport Publishing
  37. Monleón, C., "Evaluating the Performance of Adjudicators after a DanceSport Competition", Journal of Sport Psychology, 27(1), pp.23~30 (2018)
  38. "The Skating System" (2001)[URL]
  39. "Improving The Skating System-I" (2002)[URL]
  40. "Improving The Skating System-Ⅱ: Methods And Paradoxes From A Broader Perspective" (2004)[URL]
  41. "Conscience"[URL]
  42. Prelević, M., "The Analysis of the Judging System 2.1 in Dancesport", Research in Physical Education, Sport & Health, 7(2), pp.75~83 (2018)
  43. Prelević, M., "Judging System in Dancesport", Sport-Science & Practice, 7(1), pp.55~66 (2017)
  44. Premelc, S., "Reliability of Judging in DanceSport", Frontiers in Psychology, 10, pp.1~8 (2019)
  45. "How a dance competition is judged" (1998)[URL]
  46. "Grand Slam Series, Championships/Cups Multisport Event Format, WDSF Vision 2012 And Beyond" (2015)[URL]
  47. "Judging System 2.1(2015): Explanation of the calculation formula, WDSF Vision 2012 and Beyond" (2015)[URL]
  48. Silvia, T., "Study Regarding The Need to Objectify Evaluation in Latin American Dances", Science, Movement and Health, 16(2), pp.706~771 (2016)
  49. Tay, S., "World DanceSport federation Adjudicators Handbook" (2013), WDSF DanceSport Academy
  50. Tay, S., "World DanceSport federation Adjudicators’Handbook" (2015), WDSF DanceSport Academy
  51. Tušak, M., "Important Psychological Issues in Relation to Evaluation and Estimation in Dance", IDO Dance Sport Rules & Regulations : Annex, 1, pp.133~136 (2018)
  52. Vermey, R., "Artistic Criteria for IDSF Adjudicators" (2002), Discussion Partner to open up the debate about “Artistic Criteria” for IDSF
  53. Vermey, R., "Latin: Thinking, Sensing and Doing in the Latin-American Dancing" (1994), Institution for Dance Development
  54. Vlatko, P., "Judging Objectivity Analysis with Judging Component “Movement to Music” in Standard Sport Dance “Tango”", Research in Physical Education, Sport & Health, 9(2), pp.39~44 (2020)
  55. Vlatko, P., "Judging Objectivity Analysis with Judging Component “Partnering Skills” in Latin American Sport Dance “Rumba”", Research in Physical Education, Sport & Health, 9(2), pp.40~45 (2020)
  56. Vlatko, P., "Judging Objectivity Analysis with Judging Component “Technical Qualities” in Standard Sport Dance “English Waltz”", Research in Physical Education, Sport & Health, 9(1), pp.201~206 (2020)
  57. Vlatko, P., "Judging Objectivity Analysis with Judging Component “Choreography and Presentation” in Latin American Sport Dance “Cha Cha Cha”", Research in Physical Education, Sport & Health, 9(1), pp.195~200 (2020)
  58. Wainwright, L., "The story of British popular dance: Early dates and names verified" (1996), Brighton, International Dance Teachers Association
  59. "WDC Competition Rules" (2020)[URL]
  60. "Judging Systems"[URL]
  61. "How It All Started: 1920-1999"[URL]
  62. "WDSF Competition Rules" (2021)[URL]
  63. "Sports Bulletin 4/17-Number of Judges with the use of JS 3.0" (2017)[URL]
  64. "Minutes of the WDSF Presidium Meeting held at Barcelona, Spain" (2014)[URL]
  65. "A Press Release from the President of IDSF" (2011)[URL]
  66. "IDSF New Judging System Proposal Stuttgart" (2009)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

한국과 중국의 댄스스포츠 발전 과정 탐색진옥, 정현철, 조은주무용역사기록학회 · 무용역사기록학2025 · 제77권 댄스스포츠 선수층의 현황과 미래적 과제권순룡스포츠윤리연구소 · 스포츠와 윤리2025 · 제5권 제2호댄스스포츠 라틴 종목 심사 특성에 따른 일치도 분석김미선, 이승훈국민체육진흥공단 한국스포츠과학원 · 체육과학연구2020 · 제31권 제4호파리 올림픽 출전 브레이킹 선수의 준비 방안김형남, 문병순한국무용교육학회 · 한국무용교육학회지2021 · 제32권 제4호혼합연구방법을 이용한 댄스스포츠경기의 예비심사평정척도 개발김응준, 정진오한국체육측정평가학회 · 한국체육측정평가학회지2008 · 제10권 제1호브레이킹 댄스 교육의 현황과 과제차윤미한국무용교육학회 · 한국무용교육학회지2021 · 제32권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

카오스이론의 관점에서 본 리듬운동의 확장성: 한국리듬운동학회를 중점으로최영준pp. 1-10스포츠 지도자의 사회심리적 건강을 위한 바디풀니스 프로그램 구성: 근거이론적 접근박정희, 이준영, 이현영pp. 33-47초등학교 6학년 학생의 요가수련과 공격성의 관계권웅, 최영준, 박은주pp. 49-57키넥트를 활용한 움직임표현활동을 중심으로 음악⋅미술 프로그램이 지적장애인의 회복탄력성에 미치는 효과홍성희pp. 59-72슬링운동과 근막이완기법이 만성 목통증 여성의 통증, 압통역치와 근활성도에 미치는 영향황정호, 최영준pp. 73-86
원문 보기