Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dental and skeletal effects of the modified C-palatal plate (MCPP) for total arch distalization in adult patients with Class II malocclusion and compare the findings with those of cervical pull headgear. Methods: The study sample consisted of the lateral cephalograms of 44 adult patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion, including 22 who received treatment with MCPP (age, 24.7 ± 7.7 years) and 22 who received treatment with cervical pull headgear (age, 23.0 ± 7.7 years). Pre- (T1) and post-treatment (T2) cephalograms were analyzed for 24 linear and angular measurements. Multivariate analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the changes after treatment in each group and differences in treatment effects between the two groups. Results: The mean amount of distalization at the crown and root levels of the maxillary first molar and the amount of distal tipping was 4.2 mm, 3.5 mm, and 3.9o in the MCPP group, and 2.3 mm, 0.6 mm, and 8.6o in the headgear group, respectively. In addition, intrusion by 2.5 mm was observed in the MCPP group. In both groups, the distal movement of the upper lip and the increase in the nasolabial angle were statistically significant (p < 0.001). However, none of the skeletal and soft tissue variables exhibited significant differences between the two groups. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that MCPP is an effective treatment modality for total arch distalization in adults. [Korean J Orthod 2017;47(6):375-383]
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dental and skeletal effects of the modified C-palatal plate (MCPP) for total arch distalization in adult patients with Class II malocclusion and compare the findings with those of cervical pull headgear. Methods: The study sample consisted of the lateral cephalograms of 44 adult patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion, including 22 who received treatment with MCPP (age, 24.7 ± 7.7 years) and 22 who received treatment with cervical pull headgear (age, 23.0 ± 7.7 years). Pre- (T1) and post-treatment (T2) cephalograms were analyzed for 24 linear and angular measurements. Multivariate analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the changes after treatment in each group and differences in treatment effects between the two groups. Results: The mean amount of distalization at the crown and root levels of the maxillary first molar and the amount of distal tipping was 4.2 mm, 3.5 mm, and 3.9o in the MCPP group, and 2.3 mm, 0.6 mm, and 8.6o in the headgear group, respectively. In addition, intrusion by 2.5 mm was observed in the MCPP group. In both groups, the distal movement of the upper lip and the increase in the nasolabial angle were statistically significant (p < 0.001). However, none of the skeletal and soft tissue variables exhibited significant differences between the two groups. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that MCPP is an effective treatment modality for total arch distalization in adults. [Korean J Orthod 2017;47(6):375-383]
참고문헌 (27)
- Greenspan RA, "Reference charts for controlled extraoral force application to maxillary molars", Am J Orthod, 58, pp.486~491 (1970)
- Haas AJ, "Headgear therapy: the most efficient way to distalize molars", Semin Orthod, 6, pp.79~90 (2000)
- Jambi S, "Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (10), pp.CD008375~ (2013)
- Fontana M, "Noncompliance maxillary molar distalizing appliances:an overview of the last decade", Prog Orthod, 13, pp.173~184 (2012)
- Kinzinger GS, "Treatment effects of intraoral appliances with conventional anchorage designs for non-compliance maxillary molar distalization: a literature review", Eur J Orthod, 30, pp.558~571 (2008)
- Alberto Caprioglio, "Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy using pendulum and distal screw appliances", 대한치과교정학회지, 45(4), pp.171~179 (2015), 대한치과교정학회
- Han S, "Evaluation of palatal bone density in adults and adolescents for application of skeletal anchorage devices", Angle Orthod, 82, pp.625~631 (2012)
- Ryu JH, "Palatal bone thickness compared with cone-beam computed tomography in adolescents and adults for mini-implant placement", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 142, pp.207~212 (2012)
- Trang Vu, "Evaluation of the palatal soft tissue thickness by cone-beam computed tomography", 대한치과교정학회지, 42(6), pp.291~296 (2012), 대한치과교정학회
- Lee SM, "Palatal soft tissue thickness at different ages using an ultrasonic device", J Clin Pediatr Dent, 36, pp.405~409 (2012)
- Kook YA, "Sagittal correction of adolescent patients with modified palatal anchorage plate appliances", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 148, pp.674~684 (2015)
- Kook YA, "Orthodontic treatment of skeletal class II adolescent with anterior open bite using mini-screws and modified palatal anchorage plate", J Clin Pediatr Dent, 39, pp.187~192 (2015)
- Sa'aed NL, "Skeletal and dental effects of molar distalization using a modified palatal anchorage plate in adolescents", Angle Orthod, 85, pp.657~664 (2015)
- Kook YA, "Treatment effects of a modified palatal anchorage plate for distalization evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 146, pp.47~54 (2014)
- Park HS, "Treatment effects and anchorage potential of sliding mechanics with titanium screws compared with the Tweed-Merrifield technique", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 133, pp.593~600 (2008)
- Lai EH, "Threedimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134, pp.636~645 (2008)
- Yao CC, "Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134, pp.615~624 (2008)
- Lee J, "Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144, pp.238~250 (2013)
- Chen M, "Differences of treatment outcomes between selfligating brackets with microimplant and headgear anchorages in adults with bimaxillary protrusion", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 147, pp.465~471 (2015)
- Grave K, "Cervical vertebral maturation as a predictor of the adolescent growth spurt", Aust Orthod J, 19, pp.25~32 (2003)
- Kook YA, "A modified palatal anchorage plate for simple and efficient distalization", J Clin Orthod, 44, pp.719~730 (2010)
- Kook YA, "Design improvements in the modified C-palatal plate for molar distalization", J Clin Orthod, 47, pp.241~248 (2013)
- Kirjavainen M, "Facial profile changes in early Class II correction with cervical headgear", Angle Orthod, 77, pp.960~967 (2007)
- Egolf RJ, "Factors associated with orthodontic patient compliance with intraoral elastic and headgear wear", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 97, pp.336~348 (1990)
- Brandão M, "Clinical and quantitative assessment of headgear compliance: a pilot study", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129, pp.239~244 (2006)
- Yu IJ, "Comparison of tooth displacement between buccal mini-implants and palatal plate anchorage for molar distalization: a finite element study", Eur J Orthod, 36, pp.394~402 (2014)
- Ju-Man Kang, "A three-dimensional finite element analysis of molar distalization with a palatal plate, pendulum, and headgear according to molar eruption stage", 대한치과교정학회지, 46(5), pp.290~300 (2016), 대한치과교정학회