Comparison of treatment effects between four premolar extraction and total arch distalization using the modified C-palatal plate
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue treatment effects of nonextraction therapy using the modified C-palatal plate (MCPP) to those of premolar extraction (PE) treatment in adult patients with Class II malocclusion. Methods: Pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalographs of 40 adult patients with Class II malocclusion were retrospectively analyzed. The MCPP group comprised 20 patients treated with total arch distalization of the maxillary arch while the PE group comprised 20 patients treated with four PE. Fifty-eight linear and angular measurements were analyzed to assess the changes before and after treatment. Descriptive statistics, paired t-test, and multivariate analysis of variance were performed to evaluate the treatment effects within and between the two groups. Results: The MCPP group presented 3.4 mm of retraction, 1.0 mm of extrusion, and 7.3o lingual inclination of the maxillary central incisor. In comparison, the PE group displayed greater amount of maxillary central incisor retraction and retroclination, mandibular incisor retraction, and upper lip retraction (5.3 mm, 14.8o, 5.1 mm, and 2.0 mm, respectively; p < 0.001 for all). In addition, the MCPP group showed 4.0 mm of distalization and 1.3 mm of intrusion with 2.9o distal tipping of the maxillary first molars. Conclusions: These findings suggest the MCPP is an effective distalization appliance in the maxillary arch. The amount of incisor retraction, however, was significantly higher in the PE group. Therefore, four PE may be recommended when greater improvement of incisor position and soft-tissue profile is required.[Korean J Orthod 2018;48(4):224-235]
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue treatment effects of nonextraction therapy using the modified C-palatal plate (MCPP) to those of premolar extraction (PE) treatment in adult patients with Class II malocclusion. Methods: Pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalographs of 40 adult patients with Class II malocclusion were retrospectively analyzed. The MCPP group comprised 20 patients treated with total arch distalization of the maxillary arch while the PE group comprised 20 patients treated with four PE. Fifty-eight linear and angular measurements were analyzed to assess the changes before and after treatment. Descriptive statistics, paired t-test, and multivariate analysis of variance were performed to evaluate the treatment effects within and between the two groups. Results: The MCPP group presented 3.4 mm of retraction, 1.0 mm of extrusion, and 7.3o lingual inclination of the maxillary central incisor. In comparison, the PE group displayed greater amount of maxillary central incisor retraction and retroclination, mandibular incisor retraction, and upper lip retraction (5.3 mm, 14.8o, 5.1 mm, and 2.0 mm, respectively; p < 0.001 for all). In addition, the MCPP group showed 4.0 mm of distalization and 1.3 mm of intrusion with 2.9o distal tipping of the maxillary first molars. Conclusions: These findings suggest the MCPP is an effective distalization appliance in the maxillary arch. The amount of incisor retraction, however, was significantly higher in the PE group. Therefore, four PE may be recommended when greater improvement of incisor position and soft-tissue profile is required.[Korean J Orthod 2018;48(4):224-235]
참고문헌 (29)
- Yongxu Piao, "Five-year investigation of a large orthodontic patient population at a dental hospital in South Korea", 대한치과교정학회지, 46(3), pp.137~145 (2016), 대한치과교정학회
- Fritz U, "Lingual technique--patients' characteristics, motivation and acceptance. Interpretation of a retrospective survey", J Orofac Orthop, 63, pp.227~233 (2002)[DOI]
- Cardaropoli D, "Orthodontic movement and periodontal bone defects: Rationale, timing, and clinical implications", Semin Orthod, 20, pp.177~187 (2014)[DOI]
- Peterson LJ, "Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery", pp.259~263 (1998), Mosby
- Crossman IG, "Long term results of premolar extractions in orthodontic treatment", Br J Orthod, 5, pp.61~66 (1978)[DOI]
- Garib DG, "Stability of extraction space closure", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 149, pp.24~30 (2016)[DOI]
- Cope JB, "Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: A paradigm shift", Sem Orthod, 11, pp.3~9 (2005)[DOI]
- Choi YJ, "Total distalization of the maxillary arch in a patient with skeletal Class II malocclusion", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139, pp.823~833 (2011)[DOI]
- Kinzinger GS, "Efficiency of a skeletonized distal jet appliance supported by miniscrew anchorage for non-compliance maxillary molar distalization", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136, pp.578~586 (2009)[DOI]
- Bechtold TE, "Distalization pattern of the maxillary arch depending on the number of orthodontic miniscrews", Angle Orthod, 83, pp.266~273 (2013)[DOI]
- Sugawara J, "Distal movement of maxillary mol ars in nongrowing patients with the skeletal ancho rage system", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129, pp.723~733 (2006)[DOI]
- 마수정, "Analysis of midpalatal miniscrew-assisted maxillary molar distalization patterns with simultaneous use of fixed appliances: A preliminary study", 대한치과교정학회지, 46(1), pp.55~61 (2016), 대한치과교정학회
- Jung MH, "A comparison of second premolar extraction and mini-implant total arch distalization with interproximal stripping", Angle Orthod, 83, pp.680~685 (2013)[DOI]
- Sheridan JJ, "Air-rotor stripping update", J Clin Orthod, 21, pp.781~788 (1987)
- Sar C, "Comparison of two implant-supported molar distalization systems", Angle Orthod, 83, pp.460~467 (2013)[DOI]
- Wilmes B, "Correction of upper-arch asymmetries using the Mesial-Distalslider", J Clin Orthod, 47, pp.648~655 (2013)
- Papadopoulos MA, "Orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion with miniscrew implants", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134, pp.604.e1~604.e196 (2008)
- Kircelli BH, "Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance", Angle Orthod, 76, pp.650~659 (2006)
- Escobar SA, "Distalization of maxillary molars with the bone-supported pendulum: a clinical study", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131, pp.545~549 (2007)[DOI]
- Kook YA, "A modified palatal anchorage plate for simple and efficient distalization", J Clin Orthod, 44, pp.719~730 (2010)
- Lee SK, "Comparison of treatment effect between the MPAP and buccally miniscrew groups in nonextractioncase", pp.2016
- 박종욱, "Comparison of treatment effects between the modified C-palatal plate and cervical pull headgear for total arch distalization in adults", 대한치과교정학회지, 47(6), pp.375~383 (2017), 대한치과교정학회
- Grave K, "Cervical vertebral maturation as a predictor of the adolescent growth spurt", Aust Orthod J, 19, pp.25~32 (2003)
- Tweed CH, "Indications for the extraction of teeth in orthodontic procedure", Am J Orthod Oral Surg, 42, pp.22~45 (1945)
- Basciftci FA, "Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects", Angle Orthod, 73, pp.36~42 (2003)
- Saelens NA, "Therapeutic changes in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment", Eur J Orthod, 20, pp.225~236 (1998)[DOI]
- Steyn CL, "Differential premolar extractions", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 112, pp.480~486 (1997)[DOI]
- Duran GS, "Three-dimensional analysis of tooth movements after palatal miniscrew-supported molar distalization", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 150, pp.188~197 (2016)[DOI]
- Oh YH, "Treatment effects of microimplant-aided sliding mechanics on distal retraction of posterior teeth", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139, pp.470~481 (2011)[DOI]