近代 中国 上海 帮会의 渊源과 盛衰
The Roots and Tides of Modern Shanghai Secret Society
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Economic enterprise in the Modern Shanghai, like a political career or social life generally, was based on the family unit and depended on the cultivation of personal relationships. Thus trade depended on the family firm, in which kinship created the essential bonds of loyalty. Individuals in a family firm bore an unlimited liability but by the same token could expect family backing in a crisis. In the absence of impersonal legal safeguards and institutions of insurance and commercial law, the principal assets of a merchant were his good name and guarantors, but equally important was his personal relationship with official authorities from whom his firm might have to obtain a formal or informal sanction to do business. The chief defence of commercial class against official manipulation and exploitation was merchant group solidarity. From very early times shops or one kind were situated together on a city street. Merchants in the same line flocked together by order, and by the late Tang or Song in their interaction with officialdom, they developed guilds. In modern Shanghai merchant society growth of their personal relations followed same general practices created the patronage networks. In particular, merchants at a distance from home developed strong ties with other traders from native landers. This became the basis for the Landsmannschaften() or regional associations according to native place, likethe Ningpo Guild in Shanghai. The result was a tremendous proliferation of Landsmannschaften, organized sometimes purely by native place and sometimes by line of trade. But until the nineteenth century these voluntary associations had seldom reached the point of consolidating merchant interests and power. Instead the guilds in their various lines of trade and representing various trading places remained fragmented each in their own bailiwick.
Abstract
Economic enterprise in the Modern Shanghai, like a political career or social life generally, was based on the family unit and depended on the cultivation of personal relationships. Thus trade depended on the family firm, in which kinship created the essential bonds of loyalty. Individuals in a family firm bore an unlimited liability but by the same token could expect family backing in a crisis. In the absence of impersonal legal safeguards and institutions of insurance and commercial law, the principal assets of a merchant were his good name and guarantors, but equally important was his personal relationship with official authorities from whom his firm might have to obtain a formal or informal sanction to do business. The chief defence of commercial class against official manipulation and exploitation was merchant group solidarity. From very early times shops or one kind were situated together on a city street. Merchants in the same line flocked together by order, and by the late Tang or Song in their interaction with officialdom, they developed guilds. In modern Shanghai merchant society growth of their personal relations followed same general practices created the patronage networks. In particular, merchants at a distance from home developed strong ties with other traders from native landers. This became the basis for the Landsmannschaften() or regional associations according to native place, likethe Ningpo Guild in Shanghai. The result was a tremendous proliferation of Landsmannschaften, organized sometimes purely by native place and sometimes by line of trade. But until the nineteenth century these voluntary associations had seldom reached the point of consolidating merchant interests and power. Instead the guilds in their various lines of trade and representing various trading places remained fragmented each in their own bailiwick.
참고문헌 (29)
- 简又文, "太平天国全史, 上册" (1989), 江苏人民出版社
- 顾德曼, "新文化, 旧习俗:同乡组织和五四运动. in: 上海: 通住世界之桥" (1989), 上海社会科学院出版社
- 郭 驰, "近代中国社会主要矛盾结句特征及其对社会性质的影响" (1994), 河北省社会科学院
- 陶水木, "浙江商幇與上海經濟1840-1936" (2000), 上海三聯書店
- 徐麟书, "试论太平天国时期的上海小刀会起义" (1996), 浙江省社会科学院
- 徐 矛, "中國十大買辦" (1996), 上海人民出版社
- 徐文学, "中国城市文化近代化的多重路俓" (1996), 浙江省社会科学院
- 徐鼎新, "旧上海工商会馆, 公所, 同业公会的歷史考察", 上海研究論丛, 5 (1990), 上海社会科学院出版社
- 邵 雍, "二十世纪初期青帮在上海郊县的活动", 上海研究論丛, 5 (1990), 上海社会科学院出版社
- 苏智良, "试论1898年四明公所事件的歷史作用" (1991), 上海市社会科学界联合会
- 苏智良, "近代上海帮会繁盛原因初探", 上海研究論丛, 2 (1989), 上海社会科学院出版社
- 沈渭滨, "上海城市民众和上海小刀会起义. in: 复旦学报: 社科版" (1997), 复旦大学
- 吴善中, "湘军与哥老会. in: 江海学刊" (1997), 江苏省社会科学院
- 汪润元, "试论晚清江湖帮会的组织特征及演进轨跡. in: 河南师范大学学报: 哲社版" (1997), 河南师范大学
- 饶怀民, "第一届中国近代秘密社会史国际学術讨论会综述", 湖南师范大学学报 (1994), 湖南师范大学出版社
- 張仲禮, "中國近代城市企業, 社會, 空間" (1998), 上海社會科學院出版社
- 曹 峻, "近代上海寧波帮的经济与组织", 海师范大学学报: 哲社版 (1995)
- 曹朔邵雍, "‘小刀会起义与近代上海’ 学術讨论综述. in: 社会科学" (1993), 上海社会科学院
- 朱 林, "洪门志" (1947), 中华书局
- 周 武, "小刀会起义, 太平军战事与近代上海的崛起. in: 上海社会科学院学術季刊" (1996), 上海社会科学院
- 中国科学院上海歷史研究所筹备委员会, "上海小刀会起义史料滙编" (1959), 上海人民出版社
- 池子华, "中国近代流民" (1996), 浙江人民出版社
- 邹依仁, "旧上海人口变迁研究" (1980), 上海人民出版社
- 贺跃夫, "晚清县以下基层行政官署与乡村社会控除. in: 中山大学学报: 社科版" (1995), 中山大学
- 胡珠生, "清代洪门史" (1996), 遼宁人民出版社
- [URL]
- [URL]
- [URL]
