淸末 駐漢城 商務公署와 華商組織
The Office for Chinese Commercial Affairs in Hanseong and Overseas Chinese Organizations in the Late Qing Dynasty
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Overseas Chinese in Korea originated from Chinese merchants at the end of the Qing Dynasty. As each Chinese merchant had to be a member of a group in order to run their business in Korea, the guilds in Seoul naturally became the center of this overseas Chinese society. In this way, Chinese merchants in the early Chinese society in Korea formed their groups centering on specific localities, and the structure divided into groups was a remarkable phenomenon. However, while complying with the goals of the organization of the Chinese Guild, the Chinese merchants wanted to form their own groups with culturally homogeneous members, separate the organization, and promote the group’s common goals. This is also probably the reason that they were grouped by locality according to the traditional principle of organization. As the guild was established for pursuing common goals, namely,the development and unity of the Chinese merchant association, it was the first private office launched mainly by Chinese merchants. Chinese merchants opened a center for discussing public affairs and recommended the representative of the guild. In addition, they collected 0.4% dues from the members’ trades and used it for the operation of the guild. Even boatmen agreed on the “Regulations on the Guild” stipulated by Chinese merchants for raising funds for the guild’s operation. This suggests that there were motives for voluntary participation. However,the selection of director, the representative of the guild, was initiated by the role of supervising the ground-leveling work for the Incheon settlement, and the official seal was paid for by the Commercial Affairs Office. Furthermore, half of the money for buying the guild building was borrowed by General Commissioner Chen Shutang from official funds. Considering these facts, the guild was launched not as a completely private organization but as “a semi-governmental”institution. Differing from pre-modern overseas Chinese who were irrelevant to state power, modern overseas Chinese grew in close connection with state power. Chinese merchants in Seoul were managed strategically by their homeland from the early period of overseas Chinese social organizations. On the other hand, Chinese merchants used state power by complying with the state’s political strategies actively. This provided a base for Chinese merchants to grow and surpassed Korean and Japanese merchants in Seoul where competition among Korea, Japan,and China was most fierce.
Abstract
Overseas Chinese in Korea originated from Chinese merchants at the end of the Qing Dynasty. As each Chinese merchant had to be a member of a group in order to run their business in Korea, the guilds in Seoul naturally became the center of this overseas Chinese society. In this way, Chinese merchants in the early Chinese society in Korea formed their groups centering on specific localities, and the structure divided into groups was a remarkable phenomenon. However, while complying with the goals of the organization of the Chinese Guild, the Chinese merchants wanted to form their own groups with culturally homogeneous members, separate the organization, and promote the group’s common goals. This is also probably the reason that they were grouped by locality according to the traditional principle of organization. As the guild was established for pursuing common goals, namely,the development and unity of the Chinese merchant association, it was the first private office launched mainly by Chinese merchants. Chinese merchants opened a center for discussing public affairs and recommended the representative of the guild. In addition, they collected 0.4% dues from the members’ trades and used it for the operation of the guild. Even boatmen agreed on the “Regulations on the Guild” stipulated by Chinese merchants for raising funds for the guild’s operation. This suggests that there were motives for voluntary participation. However,the selection of director, the representative of the guild, was initiated by the role of supervising the ground-leveling work for the Incheon settlement, and the official seal was paid for by the Commercial Affairs Office. Furthermore, half of the money for buying the guild building was borrowed by General Commissioner Chen Shutang from official funds. Considering these facts, the guild was launched not as a completely private organization but as “a semi-governmental”institution. Differing from pre-modern overseas Chinese who were irrelevant to state power, modern overseas Chinese grew in close connection with state power. Chinese merchants in Seoul were managed strategically by their homeland from the early period of overseas Chinese social organizations. On the other hand, Chinese merchants used state power by complying with the state’s political strategies actively. This provided a base for Chinese merchants to grow and surpassed Korean and Japanese merchants in Seoul where competition among Korea, Japan,and China was most fierce.
참고문헌 (20)
- 臺灣中央硏究院近代史硏究所所藏, "淸季駐韓使館檔: 陳樹棠, 袁世凱, 唐紹儀 宗", ~
- 楊昭全, "朝鮮華僑史" (1991), 中國華僑出版公司
- 中央硏究院近代史硏究所, "淸季中日韓關係史料", pp.3~5 (1972), 中央硏究院近代史硏究所
- 崔承現, "韓國華僑史硏究-從上國國民到多層認定", 박사, pp.2000
- 石川亮太, "19世紀末東アジアにおける國際流通構造と朝鮮-海産物の生産·流通から", 史學硏究, 109(2) (2000)
- 石川亮太, "ソウル大學所藏『同泰來信』の性格と成立科程-近代朝鮮華僑硏究の端緖として", 九州大學東洋史論集, 32 (2004)
- 石川亮太, "開港後朝鮮における華商の貿易活動-1894年の淸國米中繼貿易を通じて, In 中國近代化の動態構造" (2004), 京都大學人文科學硏究所
- 石川亮太, "朝鮮開港後における華商の對上海貿易-同順泰資料を通じて", 東洋史硏究, 63(4) (2005)
- 石川亮太, "開港期漢城における朝鮮人·中國人間の商取引と紛爭-『駐韓使館檔案』を通じて", 年報 朝鮮學, 10 (2007)
- 강진아, "근대 동아시아의 초국적 자본의 성장과 한계-재한화교기업 同順泰(1874?~1937)의 사례, In 근대전환기 동아시아 삼국과 한국-근대인식과 정책" (2006), 성균관대학교출판부
- 강진아, "廣東네트워크(Canton-Networks)와 朝鮮華商 同順泰", 사학연구, 88(88), pp.775~820 (2007), 한국사학회
- 강진아, "근대전환기 한국화상의 대중국 무역의 운영방식― 『同順泰寶號記』의 분석을 중심으로 ―", 동양사학연구, (105), pp.205~251 (2008), 동양사학회
- 김건우, "근대공문서의 탄생" (2008), 소와당
- 김희신, "淸末(1882-1894년) 漢城 華商組織과 그 位相", 중국근현대사연구, (46), pp.53~80 (2010), 중국근현대사학회
- 김희신, "駐朝鮮使館의 화교 실태조사와 관리 ― 청일전쟁 이전 漢城ㆍ仁川을 중심으로 ―", 명청사연구, (34), pp.205~236 (2010), 명청사학회
- 김희신, "‘漢城 開設行棧 조항 개정’ 교섭과 중국의 대응", 동양사학연구, (113), pp.199~244 (2010), 동양사학회
- 김희신, "근대 한중관계의 변화와 외교당안의 생성 ― 「淸季駐韓使館保存檔」을 중심으로 ―", 중국근현대사연구, (50), pp.35~73 (2011), 중국근현대사학회
- 譚建平, "재한화교의 사단조직에 대한 연구: 서울지역을 중심으로", 석사, 인류학, pp.1985
- 孫禎睦, "韓國 開港期 都市變化過程硏究-開港場·開市場·租界·居留地" (1994), 一志社
- 이옥련, "근대 한국 화교사회의 형성과 전개", 박사, pp.2005
