본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일・한 양언어의 시각 오노마토피어 대조연구 –食感覚을 중심으로–

A Contrastive study of sight Onomatopoeia in Korean and Japanese language -Focusing on the sense of taste-

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

The vocabulary about the meal sense varies, and the expression that is rich in Onomatopoeia exists when I think from the side called “the taste expression”. Particularly, there were many things which I was concerned with the five senses of “taste, sense of smell, the sense of touch, sight, the hearing”, and appeared, but contrast considered sight Onomatopoeia of Japanese and Korean in this study in that. At first I divided sight into “movement”, “cooking”, and made each subdivision. “The movement” divided it into a “state” state “state to chew” to drink “to eat”, but the Onomatopoeia that Korean varied than Japanese more generally was collected. About “the cooking,” I divided it into a “state” state “state” state to run “to cut” to bake “to boil”, but Japanese and Korean appeared at the about the same ratio. Difference in cooking person and how to eat food in the Japan-Korea two countries influences it in that, and a point appearing in the expression that is different in the Onomatopoeia is an interesting result. In addition, I may be derived from a concrete meaning to express movement in an invisible abstract concept when I look at the derivation aspect of the meaning and may be derived from a meaning to express a state to eat for a meaning to express other states. When Onomatopoeia is an abundant language, Japanese and Korean are known, but there is the part that a semantic characteristic and expression method are different if a use aspect of the Onomatopoeia in both Japan-Korea languages is not same, and there is the expression resembling. In addition, I was able to confirm that I left from a meaning to express sight, and the aspect to be derived appeared for various meanings by various patterns. It is thought that such a result has to compare it with not only the verbal side but also the cultural side. The study on “sense of smell, hearing” of the meal sense wants to make problem in the future.

Abstract

The vocabulary about the meal sense varies, and the expression that is rich in Onomatopoeia exists when I think from the side called “the taste expression”. Particularly, there were many things which I was concerned with the five senses of “taste, sense of smell, the sense of touch, sight, the hearing”, and appeared, but contrast considered sight Onomatopoeia of Japanese and Korean in this study in that. At first I divided sight into “movement”, “cooking”, and made each subdivision. “The movement” divided it into a “state” state “state to chew” to drink “to eat”, but the Onomatopoeia that Korean varied than Japanese more generally was collected. About “the cooking,” I divided it into a “state” state “state” state to run “to cut” to bake “to boil”, but Japanese and Korean appeared at the about the same ratio. Difference in cooking person and how to eat food in the Japan-Korea two countries influences it in that, and a point appearing in the expression that is different in the Onomatopoeia is an interesting result. In addition, I may be derived from a concrete meaning to express movement in an invisible abstract concept when I look at the derivation aspect of the meaning and may be derived from a meaning to express a state to eat for a meaning to express other states. When Onomatopoeia is an abundant language, Japanese and Korean are known, but there is the part that a semantic characteristic and expression method are different if a use aspect of the Onomatopoeia in both Japan-Korea languages is not same, and there is the expression resembling. In addition, I was able to confirm that I left from a meaning to express sight, and the aspect to be derived appeared for various meanings by various patterns. It is thought that such a result has to compare it with not only the verbal side but also the cultural side. The study on “sense of smell, hearing” of the meal sense wants to make problem in the future.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 김미숙, "한·일 양언어의 식감각 표현연구 : 상징어 표현을 중심으로", 석사, 일어교육, pp.2006
  2. 閔祗英, "示差的特徵を用いた擬音語·擬態語の意味分析 ─日·韓兩言語の食を表す語を中心に─", 日本文化學報, 16, pp.51~69 (2003), 한국일본문화학회
  3. 은수희, "한・일 양언어의 촉각 오노마토피어 대조연구 -식감(食感)을 중심으로-", 일본언어문화, (25), pp.337~354 (2013), 한국일본언어문화학회
  4. 이미연, "한·일 식에 관한 의성어·의태어 고찰 : 『ラ-メン發見傳』과 그 번역본을 중심으로", 석사, 일어교육, pp.2009
  5. 泉邦寿, "日本語講座第四巻-日本語の語彙と表現-", pp.106~151 (1976), 大修館書店
  6. 国広哲弥, "五感をあらわす語彙 -共感覚比喩体系-", 言語, 18(11), pp.28~31 (1989)
  7. 瀬戸堅一, "ことばは味を越える", pp.27~61 (2003), 海鳴社
  8. 武藤彩加, "ことばは味を越える", pp.241~300 (2003), 海鳴社
  9. 矢澤真人, "現代の新しい感覚語彙からみられるもの", 言語, 18(11), pp.68~74 (1989)
  10. 남은주, "우사기의 도쿄식탁" (2010), 마로니에북스
  11. 설동순, "매운맛 행복밥상" (2011), 이룸나무
  12. (주)낱말 어휘정보 처리연구소, "의성 의태어 사전" (2011)
  13. KBS<한국인의 밥상>제작팀, "한국인의 밥상" (2011), SEEDPADER
  14. 川端晶子, "おいしさの表現辞典" (2006), 東京堂出版
  15. 飛田良文, "現代擬音語・擬態語用法辞典" (2002), 東京堂出版
  16. 国立国語研究所, "KOTONOHA「現代日本語書き言葉均衡コーパス」 少納言"

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)