일본어 설명의 모달리티에 관한 연구–무표형식의 성립과 용법을 중심으로–
A Study on the SETUMEI-Modality in Japanese
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The goal of this paper is to investigate the SETUMEI-Modality in Japanese from a perspective of temporal localization. The main arguments of this paper are as follows:First, The structure of SETUMEI is makeup of the two members. One is the descriptive sentence which reveal temporal localization like verbal-predicated sentence. The other is the explanative sentence that lack of temporal localization as in noun-predicated sentence. Next, there are marked SETUMEI-Modality like NODA, WAKEDA, KARADA, TAMEDA. NODA that has a basic structure of the SETUMEI, function with the most wildly usages which causal relationship use and non-causal relationship use while KARADA,TAMEDA have only causal relationship usages. On the other hand, WAKEDA that has a expanded structure of the SETUMEI, is using for the resultant explanation which comes to the conclusion. Lastly, in case of unmarked SETUMEI sentences, all of types predicate which lack of temporal localization like property or essence can do. However, there are some rules as in the descriptive sentence preceding the explanative sentence.
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to investigate the SETUMEI-Modality in Japanese from a perspective of temporal localization. The main arguments of this paper are as follows:First, The structure of SETUMEI is makeup of the two members. One is the descriptive sentence which reveal temporal localization like verbal-predicated sentence. The other is the explanative sentence that lack of temporal localization as in noun-predicated sentence. Next, there are marked SETUMEI-Modality like NODA, WAKEDA, KARADA, TAMEDA. NODA that has a basic structure of the SETUMEI, function with the most wildly usages which causal relationship use and non-causal relationship use while KARADA,TAMEDA have only causal relationship usages. On the other hand, WAKEDA that has a expanded structure of the SETUMEI, is using for the resultant explanation which comes to the conclusion. Lastly, in case of unmarked SETUMEI sentences, all of types predicate which lack of temporal localization like property or essence can do. However, there are some rules as in the descriptive sentence preceding the explanative sentence.
참고문헌 (28)
- 井島正博, "ノダ文の機能と構造", 日本語学論集, 6, pp.75~117 (2010)
- 奥田靖雄, "述語の意味的なタイプ", pp.1~32 (1988), 琉球大学集中講義資料
- 奥田靖雄, "ことばの科学4", pp.173~216 (1990), むぎ書房
- 奥田靖雄, "ことばの科学５", pp.187~219 (1992), むぎ書房
- 奥田靖雄, "ことばの科学６", pp.179~211 (1993), むぎ書房
- 奥田靖雄, "ことばの科学10", pp.175~202 (2001), むぎ書房
- 工藤真由美, "現代日本語ムード・テンス・アスペクト論", pp.1~662 (2014), ひつじ書房
- 佐藤里美, "ことばの科学8", pp.143~176 (1997), むぎ書房
- 佐藤里美, "説明的なむすびつき", 教育国語, 4(2), pp.1~14 (2001)
- 佐藤里美, "ことばの科学12", pp.139~181 (2009), むぎ書房
- 田中望, "日常言語における“説明”について", 日本語と日本語教育, 8, pp.49~64 (1980)
- 田野村忠温, "現代日本語の文法Ⅰ ｢のだ｣の意味と用法", pp.1~233 (1990), 和泉書院
- 정상철, "時間的限定性について - 済州市方言を中心に -", 일본연구, (38), pp.213~231 (2008), 일본연구소
- 정상철, "한국어 시상법 연구를 위한 몇 가지 제언 -언어유형론과 시간적 한정성을 중심으로-", 國語學, (63), pp.361~390 (2012), 국어학회[DOI]
- 정상철, "명사술어문의 시제에 관한 연구", 일어일문학연구, 85(1), pp.323~341 (2013), 한국일어일문학회
- 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味Ⅱ", pp.261~311 (1984), くろしお出版
- 仁田義雄, "日本語のモダリティと人称", pp.17~74 (1991), ひつじ書房
- 日本語記述文法研究会, "現代日本語文法4 第8部モダリティ", pp.189~228 (2003), くろしお出版
- 野田春美, "｢の(だ)｣の機能", pp.7~252 (1997), くろしお出版
- 樋口文彦, "ことばの科学７", pp.39~60 (1996), むぎ書房
- 樋口文彦, "ことばの科学10", pp.43~66 (2001), ことばの科学10
- 益岡隆志, "説明・判断のモダリティ", 神戸外大論叢, 52(4), pp.1~25 (2001), 神戸市外国語大学研究会
- 松岡弘, "『のだ』の文・『わけだ』の文に関する一考察", 言語文化, 24, pp.3~19 (1987)
- 八亀裕美, "日本語形容詞の記述的研究", pp.1~120 (2008), 明治書院
- 八亀裕美, "属性叙述の世界", pp.69~90 (2012), くろしお出版
- 吉田茂晃, "ノダ形式の構造と表現効果", 国文論叢, 15, pp.46~55 (1988), 神戸大学文学部国語国文学会
- 吉田茂晃, "山邊道", pp.17~31 (2000), 天理大学国語国文学会
- Givón, T., "Syntax, vol1", pp.49~54 (2001), John Benjains