東京大 國語硏究室 소장 『中庸章句』(21H11) 훈독의 내용적 고찰

Abstract

This paper deals with Chūyōshōku(21H11) possessed by the office of the Japanese language in the university of Tokyo(abb. Tokyo univ text), and examines whether diacritic marks on the body text and annotation are annotated with correct understanding or not. Moreover this study compares with this above results and alternative texts those are 2 texts by Kiyohara family (Eishō text, Tenshō text. Both of them are possessed by the Kyoto University) or other 2 texts (Kōwa text, Kanbun printing text). As a result, there are 35 examples are identified as incorrect usage in Tokyo univ text and these examples are coincided with Eishō text. As pointed out Oh(2010), it is interesting result that there is small number of different usage between Tokyo univ text and Eishō text. In above 35 instances, there are 4 incorrect examples are rectified in Tenshō text. And it is clear that proof read in the process of succession of glossed reading through like these examples. And then, there are 3 different usage with Tokyo univ text in 17 comparable instances in Kōwa text. It is very small number of example, but it makes sure that is not identify between glossed reading of Confucian classics in the Buddhist and Kiyohara family. Kanbun priting text is printed in neo-Confucian era, there are 28 examples that is error in Tokyo univ are rectified except 7 idiom usage. Especially, instances about understanding of syntax are corrected based on accurate understanding. This different result of both text is considered by improvement of neo-Confucian comprehension and in advanced of scholarly accumulation from Kiyohara family.