TPP 협상과 농업문제를 둘러싼 자민당 중앙-지방정치가의 상호작용 —정당조직 주도형과 지방의회 주도형 사례의 설명책임—
LDP Central-Local Politician Interaction on the TPP and Agricultural Issues: Structure of Political Accountability in Party Organization-Led and Local Council-Led
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
This study analyzed how Japan’s agricultural issues were discussed among the LDP politicians at the local level during TPP negotiations. It aims to clarify linkage and interaction of central–local politicians in the policy process. This study analyzed two typical rural areas, Kagoshima and Kumamoto, with similar socio-economic conditions in Japan, to compare the role of central-local politicians in the LDP government’s policy process. As a result, the following three outcomes were derived. First, the forces leading the regional consensus are not same. While the central politician-led agreements were identified in Kagoshima, the local politician-led consensus was found in Kumamoto. Second, the political arenas and ways for preparing countermeasures vary depending on the region. In Kagoshima, the LDP Branch Federation(Kenren), based on the human network of central-local politicians, was at the center to discuss measures. In Kumamoto, the special committee of local council was centralized to clarify TPP counterplan. Third, the role of LDP politicians has increased after the TPP settlement. In other words, the effort of central-local politicians to preparing for agricultural countermeasures on TPP was mainly effective as the parties for political accountability to persuade electorates, while the actions of the ruling party politicians were limited during the negotiations. It means that linkage and interaction of central–local politicians are resilient by region, but as a result, they contribute to the political accountability of the government of party.
참고문헌 (29)
- Carty, R. Kenneth, "Parties as Franchise Systems: The Stratarchical Organizational Imperative", Party Politics, 10(1), pp.5~24 (2004)
- Houten, Van Pieter, "Multi-Level Relations in Political Parties: A Delegation Approach", Party Politics, 15(2), pp.137~156 (2009)
- Hijino, Ken Victor, "Intra-party conflicts over gubernatorial campaigns in Japan: Delegation or franchise?", Party Politics, 20(1), pp.78~88 (2014)
- Weiner, Robert, "Japanese Electoral Politics: Creating a New Party System", pp.122~140 (2003), Routledge
- 市民社会における制度改革―選挙制度と候補者リクルート, "浅野正彦", 慶応義塾大学出版会, 171~230 (2006)
- 이주경, "中央ー地方マルチレベル(Multi-level)からみた 自民党の政策と組織運営", 일본연구, (70), pp.93~120 (2016), 일본연구소[DOI]
- 斎藤 淳, "自民党政権の政治経済学: 利益誘導政治の自己矛盾", pp.181~206 (2010), 勁草書房
- 砂原庸介, "変貌する日本政治", pp.101~126 (2009), 勁草書房
- 建林正彦, "政党組織の政治学", pp.299~317 (2013), 東洋経済新報社
- 高安健将, "自民党の組織構造と首相の権力", 選挙研究, 30(2), pp.35~48 (2014)
- 辻 陽, "政界再編と地方議会会派: 系列, はいきているのか", 選挙研究, 24(1), pp.16~31 (2008)
- 待鳥聡史, "官邸権力の変容―首相同姓データの包括的分析を手がかりに―", 選挙研究, 31(2), pp.19~31 (2015)
- 中北浩爾, "自民党-｢一強｣の実像", pp.247~250 (2017), 中央口論新社
- 平野 浩, "有権者の選択", pp.252~268 (2015), 木鐸社
- 山田真裕, "二大政党制の崩壊と政権得担当能力の評価", pp.109~122 (2017), 木鐸社
- 熊本県議会事務局, "熊本県議会史 第7巻", pp.179~182 (1994), 熊本県議会
- 自民党農林水産戦略調査会, "農政新時代: 努力が報われる農林水産業の実現にむけて(2015", 11, pp.2015, ~
- 自民党外交, "TPP対策に関する決議(別紙)TPPに関してまもりぬくべき国益(2013", 02, pp.2013, ~
- 自由民主党鹿児島県連支部連合会, "第59回 定期大会", 自由民主党鹿児島県連支部連合会, 14~ (2013)
- "第183回 国会 農林水産委員会 第6号 平成25年4月19日 TPP協定交渉参加に関する件" (2013)[URL]
- "鹿児島県議会議事録"[URL]
- "熊本県議会議事録"[URL]
- "TPP対策特別委員会会議議事録"[URL]
- "都道府県データ"[URL]
- "가고시마 농협 관계자 인터뷰(일시: 2017", 01, pp.2017, ~
- "가고시마 자민당 국회의원 인터뷰(일시: 2016", 03, 01, pp.24)[DOI]
- "가고시마 현(県)의원 인터뷰(일시: 2017", 08, pp.2017, ~
- "구마모토 자민당 현(県)의원 인터뷰(일시: 2017", 08, pp.2017, ~
- "자민당 가고시마지부연합회 관계자 인터뷰(일시: 2015", 09, pp.2015, ~